When you follow aesthetic/fandom blogs but also social issue blogs
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Three Goblin Art

oozey mess
trying on a metaphor
NASA
occasionally subtle

titsay
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
AnasAbdin

#extradirty
Cosmic Funnies
Keni
almost home
Acquired Stardust
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Discoholic 🪩

pixel skylines
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Mike Driver
art blog(derogatory)
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from Indonesia
seen from Taiwan
seen from India

seen from Indonesia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Sweden

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States
@groupoids
When you follow aesthetic/fandom blogs but also social issue blogs

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
came to me in a dream
@abalidoth
If your country has a "thing", do you like it?
yes
no
nuance
other
results
Example: Canada is known for hockey but I dislike it.
This is absolutely the funniest spam email I've ever gotten.
so-called "free thinkers" when they're left adjoint to a forgetful thinker (me)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
omg i did the infamous /y/ instead of /j/ thing,,, pwease reblog the edited version sowwy
the prefix /b/ means 1-dimensional ("bar code"), and the prefix /kju/ means 2-dimensional ("QR code"). noticing this, many scholars have lost their sanity believing in and trying to find a way to continue the pattern. "there has to be a timeline times square time cube thing here, i know it", said one such scholar, before trailing off, muttering something about how a certain cartesian product of a 2-dimensional object and a 1-dimensional object results in a /kjub/
factoids are neither unverified hearsay nor small facts. in truth, they are like facts but they can have more than one object
dog mathematician: arff (arf and only arf)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
First time I see the full lyrics without it being take me to snurch (snail church)
What really makes this for me is that OP could have phoned it in on the chorus and just repeated the same fics, but no. They found a unique one every time. Class act.
Workers of the world, unite!
Co-workers of the world, intersect!
In Super Paper Mario, it is possible to die while talking to Old Man Watchitt in Yold Town in Chapter 1-2, a rare example of being able to die during a conversation.
If Mario has 1 HP remaining, enters 3D and positions himself in the left chair in Old Man Watchitt's house, then talks to him, he will accidentally overshoot the correct 2D plane when attempting to reach the spot he is supposed to be standing while talking.
This will cause him to literally fall out of reality by walking perpendicularly out of the 2D plane. Due to only having 1 HP remaining, this will kill Mario and cause a Game Over in the middle of Old Man Watchitt talking.
Main Blog | Patreon | Twitter | Bluesky | Small Findings | Source
doesn't fit
If I want to be right, then proof by contrapositive is not wrong.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The thing about the number 0 is that it’s the summation of every single number. Positive, negative, irrational, complex: you name it. The whole number line is in there. It’s like a kind of inverted Infinity.
@groupoids
If you want a place to start reading, I’d go with Peano’s Axioms, or perhaps Cantor’s work on Infinity. I will attempt to explain:
0 + 1 = 1 ; by rearranging, we can get 1 - 1 = 0 , and we can also arrive at 0 - 1 = -1. We can do this for any number. 0 - 67 = -67 ; 0 + 3 + 2i = 3 + 2i; 0 + e = e ; etc. You might say that every number is the result of a modification to 0. In this way we could define 0 as the Summation of all Numbers, or what you get when you add up the whole number line from {-∞,+ ∞}. 0 is the number you get when you smash the two infinities together.
I don’t know how to Prove this, but I think this is why 0 is. Like That. Like. You multiply or divide by an arbitrarily large number and you’ll get an arbitrarily large result but it’s one result. When you operate on 0 you’re operating on a symmetrical set of all magnitudes and cardinalities. I think it’s something about being in the symmetrically balanced position. Something in one of Peano’s Axioms about defining the set of Natural Numbers with 0 at the center, or one of Cantor’s things about how Cardinality works. I am admittedly fuzzy on the details.
Anyway if you have any thoughts I’m listening
hmm, i'm familiar with these, and it seems like as long as you have additive inverses, any number can have this property! you can choose to center around 0, or around another number by subtracting that number. what's unique here is 0 acting as the additive identity, but that doesn't imply that the sum is 0, even though the set is symmetrical about 0. for a counterexample, simplifying and considering the set
S = {1/n : n in N} U {0} U {-1/n : n in N},
depending on in what order you add the terms, you can make the result equal any real number you want, because of the riemann rearrangement theorem!
the reals or complex numbers are symmetrical about 0, but also about every other number - and the peano axioms describe the natural numbers, at which 0 is an end, not a center!
adding uncountably many nonzero terms is something unusual one would have to very carefully and specialized-ly define, which is what i think i meant by asking "in what sense" initially
Interesting! I am, admittedly, out of my depth, but this is how we learn.
Could you think of some way to specifically define adding infinitely many nonzero terms? Would that result warrant a unique symbol?
folks use the same symbol Σ for summing either finitely or countably many terms, even though the way a countable "sum" is actually defined is not as a sum, but as a limit of the sequence of partial sums (assuming that limit converges). and we can't just sum across a set alone because adding in a different order gives you different partial sums, and there are exactly two ways order can matter here, at least in the real case: either you get the same sum no matter the order (if the sum is absolutely convergent), or you can get any number you want by choosing some order (if the sum is not) - there's no in between! and i'm not aware of any general way to define an uncountable sum of terms, unless all but countably many are zero anyway.
The thing about the number 0 is that it’s the summation of every single number. Positive, negative, irrational, complex: you name it. The whole number line is in there. It’s like a kind of inverted Infinity.
@groupoids
If you want a place to start reading, I’d go with Peano’s Axioms, or perhaps Cantor’s work on Infinity. I will attempt to explain:
0 + 1 = 1 ; by rearranging, we can get 1 - 1 = 0 , and we can also arrive at 0 - 1 = -1. We can do this for any number. 0 - 67 = -67 ; 0 + 3 + 2i = 3 + 2i; 0 + e = e ; etc. You might say that every number is the result of a modification to 0. In this way we could define 0 as the Summation of all Numbers, or what you get when you add up the whole number line from {-∞,+ ∞}. 0 is the number you get when you smash the two infinities together.
I don’t know how to Prove this, but I think this is why 0 is. Like That. Like. You multiply or divide by an arbitrarily large number and you’ll get an arbitrarily large result but it’s one result. When you operate on 0 you’re operating on a symmetrical set of all magnitudes and cardinalities. I think it’s something about being in the symmetrically balanced position. Something in one of Peano’s Axioms about defining the set of Natural Numbers with 0 at the center, or one of Cantor’s things about how Cardinality works. I am admittedly fuzzy on the details.
Anyway if you have any thoughts I’m listening
hmm, i'm familiar with these, and it seems like as long as you have additive inverses, any number can have this property! you can choose to center around 0, or around another number by subtracting that number. what's unique here is 0 acting as the additive identity, but that doesn't imply that the sum is 0, even though the set is symmetrical about 0. for a counterexample, simplifying and considering the set
S = {1/n : n in N} U {0} U {-1/n : n in N},
depending on in what order you add the terms, you can make the result equal any real number you want, because of the riemann rearrangement theorem!
the reals or complex numbers are symmetrical about 0, but also about every other number - and the peano axioms describe the natural numbers, at which 0 is an end, not a center!
adding uncountably many nonzero terms is something unusual one would have to very carefully and specialized-ly define, which is what i think i meant by asking "in what sense" initially