FO3lonewanderer

Welcome to my profile!

Suppressed Information/Crisis Resources

Socials

Streaming Schedule

This will be a list of Fallout 4 bugs(mostly relating to creation club content) that I will update as I find bugs hopefully for Bethesda/creation authors to fix.

Game/quest breaking bugs

(Capital Wasteland Mercenaries)In the Capital Wasteland Mercenaries creation Sparrow's body can despawn and the note on her is required to progress the quest, so myself and assumably anyone who loaded the area without doing the quest immediately is effectively soft locked.

Very Annoying Bugs

(Sea Scavengers Creation)When fighting the sea scavengers in the lower floor of the parking garage their attack that knock the player character down can push the player character into the floor or through objects, which completely soft locks them(cannot move, cannot attack in VATs, cannot use pip-boy). Alternatively the camera can glitch and force the player into a static third person camera(can only see the player and enemies if within the radius that is seen when knocked down). If the player is fast enough they can wipe out the sea scavengers before they get the chance to knock them to the ground, but it is very RNG based.

(CR-74L Combat Rifle creation)In the CR-74L Combat Rifle creation the key for the safe containing the receiver schematics in Quincy does not work during the "Combat Ready" quest.

Slightly Annoying Bugs

(Gunners Vs. Minutemen Creation) The minutemen flag from the Gunners Vs. Minutemen end reward doesn't have any physics or interactions in the VR pod. This stops the flag from being moved, being stored in workshop mode, or being taken. It's only aesthetic but it is meant to be a main quest reward.

(Bunker Home Pack)All of the bunkers besides the Juniper's Cove residence in the Bunker Home Pack don't have floor collision for workshop items.

Great news! The racist xenophobic smear campaign imposter account has been banned because of a report I submitted!

The idea of the Tea app is somewhat good, but had some very obvious and very serious problems from the start:

What is stopping someone from using the ID/information of a female family member, friend, or other acquaintance? No matter how many steps you go through to try to ensure safety, you can never be completely sure that someone is not acting under duress unless you can check their entire surroundings. The platform is ostensibly used to out people doing horrible things like SA and spreading STIs without telling others but simultaneously relies on those same people being honest enough to not get past the verification system.

What is stopping someone from posting completely made up slander about a man on there? He would not be able to defend himself at all nor even know that he was posted on there without someone breaking Tea's terms and there is plenty of evidence(r/entitledpeople , r/karens , r/nicegirls, and MANY others) of the lengths people will go to when confronted with a perceived slight ranging from rejecting another as a romantic partner to a very mild inconvenience. Best case scenario is women will just avoid the man, but if the accusations are especially vile or if the reader is especially sensitive to the accusation then it could easily escalate to physical violence and/or police intervention.

What about male attracted males and lesbians? Women probably would be the ones most susceptible to physical violence and societal stigma, but that doesn't mean that gay/bisexual/pansexual men should not also know about if their partner has done horrible things. It also doesn't protect lesbians at all because the whole premise is to divide by gender. Do they not deserve the same type of protection?

As stated in the video, data breaches are one of the most obvious and potentially life threatening problems. All of the information including IDs WITH ADDRESSES could potentially be directly linked to the posts, making it horribly easy for bad men to inflict retaliation if a data breach occurs. And it WOULD eventually occur just given its popularity and the digital surface area available for attack as a result.

As also stated in the video, a major issue is that the app was majorly polluted with mundane experiences which drowned out and watered down the problematic ones. A fix to this would be to give moderators the ability to flag content as extra important, but honestly given its plethora of other issues I think the app is unsalvageable from its very premise without both serious restructuring and some privacy compromises.

Ultimately the thought behind the app was fine, but it relies way too heavily on people following the rules while simultaneously highlighting problematic people who would be more likely to break the rules. The only marginally more feasible solution to fix the issues would be to switch to a criminal background check instead of a gender check although even that would be susceptible to data breaches and would allow abusive people to get in if they were not formally charged. In addition to that, to fix the verification under duress problem, they could have the user record a video that will send itself immediately after recording showing that they are alone in a room with no way of someone observing the inside then hold up one of 2 signals with their hands to say that they either:

1. Not under duress and want access to the app.

2. Under duress and are being forced to provide access to the app.