ojovivo
h

Kiana Khansmith
occasionally subtle
Interview Vampire Daily
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

shark vs the universe
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

pixel skylines

Discoholic 🪩

izzy's playlists!
Fai_Ryy
Sweet Seals For You, Always

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Noah Kahan
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Keni
RMH
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Kenya

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye

seen from Italy
seen from Palestinian Territories

seen from Germany
seen from T1

seen from Colombia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from Philippines
@eviliosa

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
a few indian brutalist buildings

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Looks like we've got a specific left-entryist tactic launching across social media: Rebutting accurate criticism of racist or sexist actions by DSA entryists with accusation of racism in return, playing on the liberal reflex to instantly apologize for causing offense. Don't take the bait.
The instant response to El-Sayed being sexist and conspiratorial to Stevens, a highly accomplished female lawmaker is "Calling a muslim mysoginistic is relying on the trope of Muslim Man as unrepentant savage" Here it is:
If the good faith liberal apologizes, the dishonest interlocutor has won. This person is bigoted themselves, and is essentially super okay with using Platner/El Sayed/Chevalier/Mamdani to beat "Libs" and especially minorities who don't get into line, so if their representatives are accurately criticized for the bigotry they show (And they're all demonstrably bigoted) this is instantly flipped back on the good-faith liberal. What this does is give DSA entryists and particularly Muslim men or people these predominately white, upper middle class DSAers are running defense for freedom to say and do whatever they want using the 'noble savage'/they just don't know any better/YOURE holding them to biased standards of western civility" attack. And it is an attack. And it relies on not holding public figures accountable for their own words and actions because they have the right enemies. Women, Black Democrats, Jews, and the other minorites who don't get into line. They're not here to fight the GOP. Here it is in context:
Here's the same thing on Tumblr:
"Mamdani doesn't know any better and it's racist to call him out for what he may or may not be doing, you should focus on the WHITE DEMOCRAT CHRISTIANS. HES A BLORBO" Here's a link to the post:
💬 47 🔁 139 ❤️ 194 · Ok but actually the Sadiq Khan analogy is EXCELLENT! Like let's talk about this! Khan has some views that I disagree
This is their new move. Policing by outright accusation, being bigoted about their Sufficiently Diverse Blorbos themselves (By holding them to lower standards) and then relying on other people to further police for them
The person on twitter said that any criticism of El-Sayed's misogyny was racist. The person on tumblr said focusing criticizing Mamdani (Like we only object to HIS antisemitism) was bigoted because he doesn't know any better. Don't take any of that shit. This is the new meta. Learn it.
This is why DSA, despite being 85% white, hides behind candidates of color. It's the exact same tactic the Republicans pull, like in the recent Virginia gubernatorial race.
The functional differences between Zohran Mamdani and Herschel Walker (as token minorities being promoted by massively racist and authoritarian political apparatuses in an effort to show how diverse and non-racist they are) is that Mamdani is more intelligent and is not violent towards his family.
Zionism IS antisemitism
Israel IS antisemitic
Black IS white.
War IS peace.
Freedom IS slavery.
Ignorance IS strength.
Some of you useful idiots need to recognize that you're being used.
Unless, of course, you are just antisemites pretending not to be, then go fill your pockets with sunflower seeds.
Used by whom?
There are two groups right now known to use social media specifically with antisemitism for their ends. One is Russia, the other is the IRGC. Both are working together (note all the Iranian drones Russia is using in Ukraine) in general, both have specific goals.
Russia wants a return to Russian imperialism (which never stopped during the USSR, just the langauge), and to defeat their biggest enemy on the world stage, the USA.
Now, Russia is busy shitting itself to death thanks to Ukraine. Putin knows the second he admits defeat in Ukraine, he will, like many other Russian oligarchs, learn how gravity is a harsh mistress. Any sane leader whose intent was conquest would have backed out by 2023. Sanity cannot be found on the Russian side of the attempt to conquer and commit genocide in Ukraine. Russia also loves to DARVO.
Iran, meanwhile, finds itself in the smaller proxy war in the Middle East. There are three main powers in the Middle East. Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Israel. The IRGC has set itself up primarily as opposition to Israel. It has funded (along with Qatar) several proxy groups to fight Israel and Saudi Arabia: Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. Two of these are Shiite groups, Hamas was a more practical 'they oppose Israel' group. Hamas actually gave the IRGC certain advice, by, again, engaging in DARVO. Among other things, by entering leftwing spaces and using leftwing language to repaint the situation. Jews are the indigenous people of Israel. Arabs are there by conquest. This is also why, for example, you will find Arabs ruling much of Northern Africa, instead of the indigenous peoples, such as the Amazigh. (As a digression, many of the indigenous peoples of North Africa had been displaced or assimilated already by Carthage and Rome, but that's a separate issue.) Iran helped Assad commit multiple genocides against native Syrian peoples in the 2010s, many of whom sought refuge, and were given it, by Israel.
Iran seeks the destruction of Israel. Like Hamas and the PLO, they agree that Israel belongs to Islam by right of conquest.
Meanwhile, Israel started from a group of Jews that had bought land at huge markups in Israel, agreed to a partition plan (which the Arabs refused because they couldn't accept the existence of Israel), declared independence when the UK wussed out, were immediately attacked by 5 arab nations who they defeated. Arabs living in the area who did not flee, they became Israeli citizens. There are Arab Muslims in the IDF, in the Knesset, serving as judges. That said, most of Israel's population comes from Jews who were living in Arab majority countries who were blamed for Israel existing, as if they did a damned thing. In 1948 there were 851,000 Jews living in Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, Yemen. Now, if we include the UAE, which didn't exist at the time, we have under 4000 Jews living in those countries. They were subjected to repeated pogroms in the 20th century as rulers blamed their failures (the actual nakba, that 5 nations couldn't defeat a newly formed one) on their own Jewish communities, who then fled to the one place Jews were safe: Israel.
WW2 and shortly after showed Jews were not safe anywhere. Not in Europe, who refused to take in Jewish refugees until they started being slaughtered. Not in the USA, which did the same. Not in the USSR, which started oppressing its Jews because Israel existed. So forming a country in their homeland as a safe haven for Jews was really the only choice. Assimilation didn't work. Coexistence didn't work. So rebuilding their homeland was the only option.
Now, obviously, not every Jew went to Israel. But a real fact is this: there are more Arab Muslims living in Israel than there are Jews living in every country except for Israel and the USA.
Now, as a note: only the Jews get to define Zionism. And while there are many branches of it, some of which most people (including most Zionists) find abhorrent, they are typically a small minority. Zionism, at it's core, is this: Israel is the ancestral homeland of the Jews, and they have a right to live there, defended from those who would harm them.
Israel is the most successful landback ever.
And Russia and the IRGC still can't stand it. Ironically, most Iranians feel kinship with Israelis.
Israel is a settler colony that has no right to exist
Oh man, you're using a Homelander reaction image. Like you know you're in the wrong.
Israel is landback. Palestinian Arabs are the settlers. You are regurgitating someone else's DARVO.
Like, if it's a colony, who is it a colony OF? A colony has a motherland, who set up this colony?
Israel was created by the imperial core and was formed in an ethnic cleanse. If you truly want to end the genocide of marginalized peoples, you wouldn’t be supporting them.
I think Israel should be abolished because I am opposed to white nationalism, genocide, rape, murder, pedophilia, forced famines, imperialism, forced sterilization, capitalism, Nazism, and mass surveillance.
Jews have the right to live in Palestine. I am not opposed to that. But this doesn’t excuse the mass murder of middle eastern people. Forcefully displacing an entire population by means of unrelenting violence is abhorrent in every meaning of the word.
My original point is that all ethnostates are bad, regardless of who created them. If Zionism is meant to provide safety to the Jews, then it is hypocritical in its entirety.
Zionism, fundamentally, is the belief that certain ethnic groups are more important than others. In other words, racist nationalism. If you really didn’t like Nazi Germany, then you would hate Israel.
We are all human.
Imperial Core... You are truly propagandized. Nobody in "the Imperial Core" actually wanted Israel to form. They were all antisemites, like your dumb ass.
Fuck off, Nazi.
A - Imperialism exists, and very much had its hand in the creation of Israel.
B - I am not antisemitic, and the original post was against antisemitism.
C - Fuck off, Nazi.
A: It exists. What imperialism was involved in the creation of Israel was opposed.
B: You are. You are just in denial.
C: You're the one parroting the positions of people who teach their kids from Mein Kampf. Nazi.
Genuinely asking, what could you possibly have interpreted as fascist or antisemetic about my previous statements?
I’m an anarcho-communist and I have some fairly recent Jewish ancestry, although I am an atheist/satanist myself.
So, the claim that zionism is antisemitic is, at best, you not knowing shit about what zionism is. Zionism is landback. Zionism is not settler colonialism. Settler colonialism would be why Arabs are living outside of the Arabian peninsula. That would be why Arabic is the primary language and ethnicity of 23 countries. That would be why Iranian is written in Arabic script rather than the scripts it had beforehand (which, to be fair, were also borrowed). That would be why the Amazigh people are 2nd class citizens in their ancestral lands.
Arabs aren't the first people to do that, nor the last, but they do seem to get overlooked in this because a bunch of people view them as noble savages
The claim that Israel is antisemitic is just farcical. Maybe you think it's antisemitic because Arabs are a 'semitic' people. You are ignoring the origin of the term antisemitism. Back in the 18th century in Germany, it was just called Judenhass, or Jew Hate. Someone who wanted his hatred to sound more scientific called it 'antisemitism', based on the idea that there were three main types of peoples: those of Ham, Shem, and Japheth, and Jews were, of course, of Shem's people. Thus, Semites. See? Scientific racism.
While there are semitic languages, the idea of a 'semitic people' is largely discounted in modern anthropology and ethnology.
Your arguments are based, again, on the nonsense found in Mein Kampf, only repackages to be more palatable to a leftist point of view. The Jews aren't filthy Palestinians who should go back to Palestine (common view in the early 20th century), but they're now horrible European Colonists stealing from the uwu smol bean Arabs. Who had been oppressing the Jews among them almost as much as the Europeans (and in many specific instances, worse). Hamas and the PA (and the PLO before it) hold to the idea that Israel was conquered by Muslims, and so it should be theirs forever. Not every Muslim holds this view. But viewed in this light, every attack on Israel (each of which was repulsed, they only ever took land in defensive wars, they tried to GIVE BACK Gaza and the West Bank, but Egypt and Jordan refused) is Arab Muslim Imperialism.
Also, the idea of the Imperial Core is literal Soviet propaganda, from the country that continued Russian Imperialism only now we're pretending we're doing it for good Communist reasons, and then after its collapse, look, Russia's invading Ukraine for what are clearly imperialist reasons.
Israel had no backing from any 'Imperial Core', actually acting in opposition to it (they declared independence from the UK), and in fact it wasn't until the 70s that the USA started actually allying with it.
Most of the more hard right-wing in Israel come from Jews whose parents were kicked out of Arabic Settler Colonial states when they blamed these people, who had nothing to do with the foundation of Israel, for Israel forming and kicking all their asses in a defensive war.
To be honest, I feel like you’re taking Hitler’s talking points and repackaging them to discredit the Arabs. I don’t think any group of people is inherently worse than another. I am simply recognizing the actions Israel has taken in their occupation of Palestine.
I dare you to go to a starving Gazan and tell them that their people are invaders. I dare you to go to a mother whose child was killed and tell her that her people are colonizers.
My point, as always, is that genocide is wrong.
You seem to get mad about that.
I mean, I'm not. I'm taking your talking points and showing how they apply to the Arabs, not the Jews. You're the one talking about settler colonialism. I think that the Palestinian Arabs should get their own state (or states) that aren't run by genocidal assholes. You are not 'recognizing the actions Israel has taken', you are spouting the propaganda of genocidal assholes.
I'm mad that you are accusing people of genocide who have been subjected to it for millennia, and who aren't doing it now. I am mad that you are misrepresenting things to shit on people who don't deserve it. I am mad that you either don't know what genocide is, or what the facts on the ground actually are, because with the definition of genocide, and the facts on the ground, Israel isn't committing genocide. But Hamas did commit a genocidal act on October 7th.
I'm mad that you're at best a useful idiot for genocidal assholes who intentionally put their own people in danger so they can blame Israel for their own war crimes. Putting military targets in among civilians is a war crime. Israel's response has been designed to try and get the civilians to leave the targets. And in urban warfare, an under 1:2 ratio of combatants to civilians killed is actually much better than pretty much anyone else achieves.
Gazans don't have missiles fired randomly from Israel in an attempt at maximum civilian damage. Israel has had that from Gaza, South Lebanon, Yemen, and Iran. Jews are not allowed to own property in Gaza. Palestinians own a lot of property in Israel, and hell, there are Palestinian Arabs in Likud, aka the political party that would like to annex the West Bank and Gaza.
Your claims are wrong, your basic facts are wrong. Be better.
wow the way op takes literally everything and then tries to darvo like
And that's a double bingo!
I'm sorry, I can't get over them saying "The Imperial Core" like that's an actual singular entity. Tell me all you have is buzzwords without telling me that all you have is buzzwords.
Victor Frankenstein after achieving the impossible and building a fucking person from scraps of the dead: Oh god, ew, ew it's ugly! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew! Ew! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew!
did you know avoidance only makes all of your problems worse. no one has ever discovered this before
I've suspected this for a long time but I usually try not to think about it

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Or policies that have been in the works since Adams or de Blasio
A good rule of thumb is: if good shit happens in their first year in office, it wasn't their work. Unless, say, they used to work closely with the former office-holder.
Breaking things can happen quickly, as Trump proves (or the so-called Moderates and their bloc, in my own country). Actual reform that makes things better? Takes years of opinion-building and coalition-building and reading reports and doing trial runs where possible. And the more it aligns with progressive goals the harder it is to get it through.
i'm not really into blondes but this is an objectively absurd connection to make
In order to be properly non-pedophilic you have to want to fuck somebody old but not with gray or white hair because that's too close to blonde which as we've established is the hair color of children. So ideally somebody old as fuck but bald. And obviously wanting to have sex with a man is misogynistic so it has to be a woman. And it can't be a white woman because that would be racist and it can't be a woman of color because that would be fetishistic, so ideally a woman with some unnatural skin color, oh let's say, purple. But it can't be an alien, because we don't know anything about alien life cycles so it could be an alien child or an alien that looks like a child. So it has to be an animal from Earth, but obviously one of human level intelligence that can communicate is otherwise that would be bestiality. So an old purple female animal that can speak English. I think the only creature you can be hot for is the Ant Queen from A Bug's Life.
Or policies that have been in the works since Adams or de Blasio
obsessed with this sidebar i found in a christain scripture website article about the timeline of the bible's construction
This is my new favorite meme.
@jewishmuppet #whatever the reasons, the showrunners decided not to include my fanfiction in their show

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Just imagine facing outrage from parents because their kids have to learn about the Holocaust in your school.
And your response is to publically apologise to them.
There is no way that what was said in that email actually happened. They tried to have their cake and eat it too, to say they did nothing wrong by teaching historical reality(they didn't) but also validate the hurt feelings of parents who think said reality is Jewish propaganda. If you don't think your child is "heard" when they learn about objective facts, that's your problem to fix and not the school's.
...I'm sorry, but the hypocrisy of that last response, when LeMarc up there threw a tantrum about the culpability of the Polish people--including the children--in the Holocaust and denied the whole thing?
Just... wow. I'm in awe.
I'm sorry, are you trying to claim @generallemarc denied the holocaust? Cuz if so, you're just straight up bringing in lies.
He denied Polish complicity in it and historical Polish antisemitism, repeatedly, consistently, and emphatically. And also accused the Jews of lying about it in the process. That's Holocaust denial.
I happen to be friends with @generallemarc and if you expect me to believe that, I'mma need proof. Cuz I know him and he for certain does not deny the holocaust.
If he's your friend, why don't you just go ahead and ask him yourself? Ask him if he'll agree with the statement that Polish people collaborated with the Nazi occupiers to find and turn over Jews in order to have them killed, up to and including teaching their kids to do so. Because that's the historical reality. It's a simple question, and if he doesn't deny that aspect of the Holocaust, he should be able to just answer "Yes, they did."
Here’s something I’ve thought about I think you might understand: There is nearly no difference between the anti-Zionist ahistory of Palestine and the Lost Cause Mythos of the Confederate States of America.
I've been saying as much for years (and Anshel Pfeffer is starting to come close). One reactionary vision of cheated racial supremacy, self-pity, and revenge fantasies deserves another.