one curiousity search on ebay to see if people are still going nuts over beanie babies has led to getting a strong contender for the funniest email ever
Mike Driver
styofa doing anything
tumblr dot com
Peter Solarz
wallacepolsom

izzy's playlists!
Today's Document

Product Placement
Jules of Nature

if i look back, i am lost
AnasAbdin
Keni

@theartofmadeline
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her


Love Begins

Kaledo Art
dirt enthusiast

seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United States

seen from Congo - Brazzaville
seen from Singapore

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Sweden

seen from India
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
@dancingbirbs
one curiousity search on ebay to see if people are still going nuts over beanie babies has led to getting a strong contender for the funniest email ever

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
everyone on replies is terrified of this fact but i just think it's so sweet and heartwarming. she's holding our hand and leading us somewhere secret and we're both giggling like kids. i love her
letâs travel through the vast unknown with mama
So, yall might have seen this story-
Which....has prompted big emotions from folks.
But as I was reading it, something bothered me a little. The headlines all say "pets" but the actual animals listed were chickens, rabbits, guinea pigs, and horses.
So I had a thought, and tracked down the untranslated Facebook post.
The word that all the English news sources, AND the automatic Facebook translation, were translating as "pets" is "husdyr"
And I don't speak Danish, but I had a suspicion. Because while rabbit and guinea pigs are often kept as pets...chickens and horses are not, right? So. I check.
I don't think Danish really distinguishes between domestic animal, livestock, and pets linguistically. And I think all those news sources just went with the Facebook automatic translation without questioning it.
Livestock. The zoo is asking for livestock donations. Rabbits, chickens, and guinea pigs are often raised for meat. They aren't asking for puppies.
Hey! Resident Dane here.
There is a distinction but sadly it is often, as you suspect correctly, missed in translation.
Husdyr are âhouse animalsâ or less directly translated farm animals. Rabbits used to be a diet staple for a lot of people (and I have no clue why Guinea pigs are labelled as such but I suspect it has to do with how our national veterinary education is structured)
The word for pets is kĂŚledyr, directly translated âpetting animalsâ. That would be dogs, cats and the other cute critters you keep around for company.
Lastly, livestock is kreaturer, but that word is rapidly going out of fashion outside work/farm lingo. It is also usually reserved for large livestock like horses and cattle.
Of course, there is a grey zone for whether fx. working dogs would be referred to as husdyr while a pet pig might be a kĂŚledyr, but I think thatâs a merging of categories that also exists in English.
Ah! Thank you! Yeah, its easy to see how a auto-translator would struggle with the nuances there.
What disappoints me is that no one at NPR or CNN or ABC or the New York Times or BBC thought to check. But then, that mistranslation is the only reason that this is even remotely newsworthy. "Zoo asks for livestock donations" just wouldn't get the clicks.
@wolfwithabook Aren't Guinea pigs sometimes raised for meat in some places?
In the Andes, where they are native, yes.
The article I read about this did include a quote with a distinction. I would argue that most people consider their horses to be pets too though.
I was curious about one thing: it said they would be euthanized and then fed to the predators. Wouldn't that make the meat unsafe for consumption? I know those drugs aren't going to have a chance to get too far in the muscles, but still?
TW: discussion of animal euthanasia and feeder animals.
There are many ways to euthanize a small animal. I can't say for sure, but one possibility would be asphyxiation with an inhalable anesthetic and then CO2, which is how rodents bred to be feeders for pet reptiles are safely euthanized. (Again, I don't know if that's exactly the plan here, just that it is one way to humanely euthanize an animal intended to be a feeder.)
As someone who worked at a zoo that took livestock donations, I can confirm that that is exactly how it works. Most zoos refuse to do live feedings as it can be viewed as inhumane to the prey and can risk injury to the predator. From my experience, CO2 is the standard procedure for quick and safe euthanasia.
It is also very common for zoos to receive livestock donations. I usually saw many roosters that came from farms who wanted laying hens but found that some chicks they'd buy would end up being roosters that are of no use to them. Another common thing was to receive rabbits or chickens that were injured or had birth defects that reduced their quality of life and were too costly for a farm to treat.
âthe arts and sciences are completely separate fields that should be pitted against each otherâ the overlap of the arts and sciences make up our entire perceivable reality they r fucking on the couch
Art vs STEM is a lie created to stop us from turning on the real enemy: business and economics
Arts vs STEM is a lie, the computer that put us on the moon was a loom of woven wires, our space suits were made by hand sewing, we need chemistry to mix paint and we need biology to raise the sheep who make the wool we spin into yarn and crochet or knit or weave and the world is beautiful
Reblogging as a science enthusiast and an artist
texts from my father continue
i love the genre "captioning things as though they were intended as art" and i think sometimes it's pretty good art.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
It makes me sad to see how common the hate for zoos is in leftist circles. To me, zoos are so symbolic of the determination and optimism in leftist thought that I often use these facilities as an example to keep me going. So when I hear fellow leftists wanting to abolish zoos it makes breaks my spirit a bit. Especially considering how necessary zoos are in the fight against the current environmental crisis.
I am the first to admit that no zoo is perfect. I have worked at a world class, accredited, non-profit zoo and it was FAR from perfect. The institution treated me and the other workers like shit. Burnout, lean staffing, and poor adherence to safety protocols resulted in poorer animal welfare outcomes for the animals. And this is a world class facility. There are many facilities out there that shouldn't exist at all that are hardly better than the menageries of feudal kings.
BUT
Zoos are vital if we want our ecosystems to survive the current mass extinction event.
No other type of institution on earth has saved as many species as zoos. From tiny snails to 1-ton bison, entire species have been returned to the wild thanks to their preservation in zoos.
There are approximately 40 animal species listed as Extinct in the Wild by the IUCN, most of which ONLY exist in zoos and aquariums. Many of these animals are only able to be taken care of because of the decades of animal husbandry science and institutional knowledge built up by our zoos and aquaria by working with other species.
There are many extinctions I cry for, but the ones that hurt the most are the ones happening in front of our eyes. The Javan rhino is all but gone. It's estimated that there would need to be about 100 rhinos for the species to survive genetically intact. There are now less than that, and none in human care. All it would take is a single tsunami or volcanic eruption and the entire population could be wiped out.
But if there were some in human care, if we had acted sooner and established a breeding population based on the centuries of knowledge we have of caring for their closest relative, the Indian rhino, we could have saved them.
So, when I see leftists talking about how all zoos are inherently destructive, I ask you to think ahead. To when polar bears, chimpanzees, or elephants go extinct in their natural homes, don't you want a place where we can save them? Where experienced animal care professionals can foster a population in human care so that one day these creatures can return to their homes? A global system of world class facilities dedicated to the survival of wildlife? So even more creatures don't end up like the Javan rhino; a species we could've saved if we'd had the will and the space to do so? If there had more zoos instead of less?
I'm not asking you to love zoos, I'm just asking that you recognize the practical necessity of their existence in the modern age. We won't survive the coming crises without other species. And they won't survive without us.
Also, besides functioning as a last, worst case scenario sanctuary for species going extinct, zoos also provide crucial funding for on-ground conservation projects, as well as nature education, which, you guessed it, is also important for effective conservation and a sustainable future!
The Arabian oryx was extinct in the wild in 1972.
[Image ID: Photograph of an Arabian oryx in the Arabian desert, courtesy of Wikimedia]
There were zero of them left. The entire population was in zoos: specifically, the Phoenix Zoo and the Wildlife Park in the US, and Al Ain Zoo in the UAE.
Breeding work in the zoos started before the oryx was fully extinct in the wild, in the 1960s, from a population of 11 at the Phoenix Zoo. There are now more than 1,200 in the wild and more than 6,000 in captivity, which includes wildlife parks. From a total population of a few dozen at most (not all oryxes resided in Phoenix at the beginning of the program but I only have Phoenixâs numbers).
Without the breeding program of Operation Oryx and the care taken by zoos to care for these animals, they would no longer exist.
The oryx was reintroduced to Oman in 1982, and other Arabian countries in stages since, and now has been downgraded in status from extinct to vulnerable.
[Image IDs: a scale showing that âvulnerableâ is four steps below âextinct in the wildâ and two steps above âleast concern;â amateur photo of an Arabian oryx at the Phoenix Zoo, taken by me in 2021]
One of my favorite thing Iâve learned about animals studies is that you should avoid using colorful leg bands when youâre banding birds because you can accidentally completely skew the data because female birds prefer males with colorful bands
Apparently if you put a red band on a male red wing blackbird his harem size can double
So like you can completely frick up the natural reproduction of a group of birds by giving a guy a bracelet so stylish that females CANNOT resist him
Me, putting a red bracelet on the leg of a male red wing blackbird: ON GOD we gonna get u some pussy bro
I remember reading a study where researchers realized that female birds of a certain species preferred males with a darker breast. So they created what they literally called a âSuper-Sexy Maleâ by catching a male and coloring his chest with a marker. They then ran dna tests on the eggs in the area.
Previously when the researchers had run these tests, they found a certain amount of infidelity was common for these birds. Somewhere around 10% of eggs were fathered by males who were not the primary mates of females.
After the advent of the Super Sexy Male, however, stuff got crazy in bird world. Infidelity skyrocketed, with upwards of 25% of ALL EGGS in the area being fathered by this specific male. Furthermore, his mateâs eggs were 100% his.
This is just insane to me. Just imagine youâre living your bird life when suddenly somebody scribbles on Daveâs chest and the ladies canât stop throwing themselves at them. Itâs stupid that we theoretically can wreck this kind of havoc on an ecosystem.
via @elytrians
A parrot eating a croissant while standing on the top of the sign.
(via)
[video description: video is a tiktok by user @dukelemurcenter featuring a mother ringtail lemur with a very small baby clinging to her back. The lemurs are on the ground of an outdoor enclosure. While text plays over the video, the mom and young lemur look around inquisitively. Text reads, "aww I want one!" "no! Let's talk about lemurs as pets. Lemurs should never be kept as pets even though it's not illegal in many US states. Lemurs are endangered, highly social, and become aggressive when kept in inappropriate homes. While a wild lemur may live 15 years and a lemur at DLC can live 30 years, pet lemurs often have to be out down when they reach maturity at 2-5 due to aggression. We know lemurs are cute and videos of them are fun but PLEASE think about the source! Are you watching a lemur live it's best, wild life? Thanks for helping us save lemurs!" Light electric music plays in the background.
It recently came up in conversation with my toddler that some birds can talk, and this has caused her great concern.
See, we were talking about how movies are pretend and how in real life, animals donât talk. I mentioned that there are some birds who talk a little bit, but not like the animals in movies, and she just looked at me like â???â
So I informed her that some kinds of parrots can copy sounds that people make, and can learn how to say words. I thought this would give her a giggle, as fun new facts often do, but she was just deeply perplexed and a little worried about this.
âBirds can talk?â âDo they ask questions?â âWhat do they say?â Why do they talk?â âDo chickens talk?â âWhat about Blue Jays?â âWhy do some birds talk?â âHow do they talk?â âBirds TALK???â
We showed her a video of a parrot doing the âHello, pretty bird, give a kissâ thing, and she was dead silent the whole time, hugging her comfort pillow with her knees to her chest. We asked if she wanted us to turn it off, and she shook her head. But we also asked if she wanted to see another one, and she shook her head even harder.
I donât know why it has distressed her so greatly to learn that some birds can mimic human speech; but then again, I donât know why it doesnât distress the rest of us more to know that some birds can mimic human speech.
I keep thinking about that post thatâs like âThe first person to hear a parrot talk was probably Not Okay.â Because thatâs exactly what happened. She had never been introduced to the concept, and her entire worldview got SHOOK.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
how what???
Iâm not good with the science of this or anything (someone who knows more feel free to add) but fish can play??? Fish can play like any other animal?? People saying it couldnât breathe, do human kids not hold their breaths to go under water for fun? Itâs just the opposite. Air is water, water is air. In the same vein as a kid being thrown up and into the pool and enjoying it, the fish is playing.
okay⌠as someone who studies marine biology I need to clarify something:
fish are unable to hold their breaths. They literally cannot take a deep breath like mammals do.
We have lungs that can take in a specific volume of air, fish have gills that work when they are ventilated enough. There are different kinds of gills, yes. Some fish have something called âoperculumâ which is like a cap on top of the gills, helping to protect them and increasing the water circulation through the gills. Some fish DONT have this structure and need to swim in order to be able to breathe.
But the fact that they cannot hold their breaths doesnt mean that they cannot survive without water for a while - in fact, fish can (usually) survive being without water WAY LONGER than we could survive being without air.
I cannot tell if this fish does this for fun, but it sure looks like it. But I am not a behavioural biologist, so I canât tell for sure.
It is abundantly clear the fish is a willing participant. Itâs sort of arrogant to assume animals other than humans donât play like humans.
Im not a behavior biologist either, but I have spent a lot of time around fish and ive spent a lot of time talking to and helping people that care for fish. (Former petstore fish guy that took his job too seriously)
That fish is having fun, and fish absolutely DO have fun!
There was a regular who came into the store I worked at a lot, and he kept several varieties of chichlids, a very smart, aggressive type of fish.
He would come in and talk to me about all the drama his fish get into. The different territorial disputes they were having, who had paired off with who, who broke up (yes chichlids are like this)
But he had a jack dempsey in particular that LOVED to chase his hand around the tank, not his wifeâs hand, not his friendâs hand, it HAD to be him. He said that as soon as he entered the room where this fishâs tank was kept, the fish would TEAR UP the tank decor, knocking things over and acting a fool off his shits until this dude stuck his hand in there and let the fish chase it around back and forth.
He theorized that his fish learned that if he knocked the tank decor around, his owner would obviously have to stick his hand in to fix it. So when he wants to play âchase dadâs handâ thats naturally how he knows he can get the hand to appear. He wont do this behavior for anybody but this one guy and he wonât tear up the tank anymore after he had received sufficient âplay timeâ, usually once a day when the guy got home from work. He likened it to having a dog that wont leave you alone till you play tug o war for a bit.
I had a betta that would spend twenty minutes at a time just swimming up to the waterfall of the filter, letting it push him down to the bottom of the tank, only to swim back up and do it again, like it was a fucking slide.
Bettas are weak swimmers, and they dislike strong currents, but this guy was using the filter current like a slide. Kinda like how we donât really like getting thrown around, but we still enjoy rollercoasters.
I also have countless stories about goldfish trying to âgive hugsâ (re: shove themselves into their owners hands during tank maintenance)
My betta knows how to lie and he will only beg for food in front of those he knows have not fed him yet.
There is so much evidence Iâve seen that fish are waaaay smarter and affectionate than we think. They absolutely have fun and I honestly donât think enough studies have been done on fish brains and fish behavior in general.
And honestly, having worked in a pet store, fish are generally treated like they donât have brains by even the fish care brands that claim expert knowledge.
Its definitely worth noting that hard scientific evidence presenting that the very opposite is true would probably lead to more robust animal welfare laws that would definitely upset the aquatics industry. Food for thought.
I think youâre absolutely right on that last point. The misconception that fish are too thoughtless to have feelings facilitates the abhorrent conditions in which they are kept and ways they are treated by the industry.
I used to have a lovely tank, I think it was 50 gallons, and among other things I kept glass catfish. All the research at the time said they were hard to keep in captivity and prone to refusing to eat and starving themselves, and that they did not live long in captivity. But I was fascinated and had to try it. It took me about three days to realize none of the literature said a word about them being nocturnal. I started feeding them at night right before bed, and had zero problems getting them to eat, saw they were incredibly active as soon as the lights went off (I have exceptional night vision) and I kept them in excellent health for years. Exponentially beyond their captive life expectancy.
I think the commercial pet fish trade is abysmal in terms of actual working knowledge of fish.
Fish Intelligence (a link at which you will also learn there is a fish called the bony-eared assfish) has been studied on a pretty broad scale, actually and thereâs a lot of scientific evidence to suggest that they are very smart creatures.
Fish have to be intelligent because they share their habitats with so many other creatures out in the open and need to know what they can trust on the fly. Some fish are bigger than them but wonât eat them. Some fish are smaller than them and still dangerous. Some dangerous ones are shaped like the harmless ones. Some react to danger the fastest so they serve as an alert system. The different foraging actions of each species indicate where food is and what kind. A fish scared enough of every other fish just wonât get a chance to feed itself so they all have to be little naturalists to get by.
Getting cozy by the fire.
Mutuals do this to me
The magical moment he realizes the hand belongs to friend not foe
(Source)
my purpose in life is to be a chicken napkin i guess
this was filmed nearly 5 years ago
she did such a Good JobâŚthatâs such a Good BabyâŚ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
A parrot eating a croissant while standing on the top of the sign.
(via)
Unmute
(via)