Celestial Oak I painted this over a month ago and totally forgot to post it lol
I love the idea of each acorn containing it's very own universe đ I've also been designing some acorn lanterns, photos coming soon!

Janaina Medeiros
Cosmic Funnies

shark vs the universe
YOU ARE THE REASON

JBB: An Artblog!

PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

taylor price

titsay

#extradirty
One Nice Bug Per Day


oozey mess

â

Kiana Khansmith
Claire Keane
sheepfilms
RMH
seen from Romania

seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from India
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from United States
@daemonmatthias
Celestial Oak I painted this over a month ago and totally forgot to post it lol
I love the idea of each acorn containing it's very own universe đ I've also been designing some acorn lanterns, photos coming soon!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
my stance on the trans athlete debate is always and forever going to be that sports should be completely desegregated because humans have one of the smallest levels of sexual dimorphism in the animal kingdom and the disparity we see between male and female performance is entirely caused by social factors rather than anything biological. âshould trans women compete against cis womenâ i think cis men and cis women could compete fairly but thatâs apparently a little too spicy for people to wrap their minds around bc theyâve been told their whole lives women are biologically inferior & never thought to question that. or wonder if itâs maybe a self fulfilling prophecy of some kind. are women biologically inferior or do they appear so because patriarchy demands that of us?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12262612_Gender_Bias_in_Mothers'_Expectations_about_Infant_Crawling
PDF | Although boys outshine girls in a range of motor skills, there are no reported gender differences in motor performance during infancy.
Letâs break down this abstract really quickâ
âAlthough boys outshine girls in a range of motor skills, there are no reported gender differences in motor performance during infancy. This study examined gender bias in mothers' expectations about their infants' motor development.â
While older children show differences between the genders in what kinds of physical activities they are capable of, no one has really seen that difference in babies, so we studied if the mothersâ beliefs about gender differences had anything to do with how those physical differences develop.
âMothers of 11-month-old infants estimated their babies' crawling ability, crawling attempts, and motor decisions in a novel locomotor task-crawling down steep and shallow slopes.â
The way we tested this works like this: we created a play area with lots of inclines of varying steepness. We asked mothers of 11-month-old babies to estimate which inclines in the play area their baby could climb up/down. Then we let each baby play in the play area to see what they could/would do.
âMothers of girls underestimated their performance and mothers of boys overestimated their performance.â
If the baby was a girl, pretty much every single mother (in the study) believed their baby girl was less capable than she really was. They believed inclines were too steep and that she could not crawl on them when she actually could. If the baby was a boy, pretty much every single mother (in the study) believed their boy child was more capable than he really was. They believed he could crawl on inclines that were actually too steep for him.
âMothers' gender bias had no basis in fact. When we tested the infants in the same slope task moments after mothers' provided their ratings, girls and boys showed identical levels of motor performance.â
Not only were mothers underestimating their girl babies and overestimating their boy babies, but when we tested the babies all of them could crawl on the same steepness of incline. There was no difference in the physical capabilities between boy babies and girl babies at 11 months old.
~
Now, these are good scientists who are not going to claim causation that they havenât proven, but this research has always left me with one really big questionâ
Are parents CAUSING girl children to develop less strong muscles by swooping in to âsaveâ them from physical tasks that they assume are too difficult for the girls?
If parents think their girl children canât climb as steep of an incline and thus prevent her from doing so, but they think their boy children can climb it and so allow him toâ wouldnât that cause boy children to develop stronger muscles? The âobservable differenceâ in physicality that appears by preschoolâ is it actually manufactured by the parents allowing their boys to engage in more physically challenging behaviors than their girls from infancy??
The Murderbot Diaries are a power fantasy about being aromantic and still developing extremely important dedicated emotionally intimate partnerships where you are a top priority in a person's life, equal to their other family or romantic attachments despite your own emotional difficulties. And having guns in your arms
âšyour thoughts unravelâš
I really wanted to see what would have happened if Hal put on the mask đ
I like how this piece turned out, but it didnât get much love on my other platforms đđ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
I'm a little peeved that everyone keeps throwing shade at only Bolaire for "Thjazi might be working with the Sundered Houses. Thjazi's ritual might be bad." Because Bolaire isn't the one constantly coming up with these theories, Murray is. Bolaire has largely been saying "I can see it" whenever Murray throws these ideas out there.
And I get it. Bolaire is the one we know hates Thjazi and thinks the worst of him (and the one a lot of people seem to be liking less and less versus liking Murray more and more), so it's easy to say "hah!" to him and think he's the one to prove wrong. But if they wanted those slanderous theories to stop, they had to get Murray set straight. Bolaire didn't much offer up his bad opinions of Thjazi until someone said something that prompted him to add to it. Murray kept cooking on those theories.
Hell, I think Bolaire dropped at least "working with the Sundered Houses" after the Knife & Palette Paints and learning about the Cloak, seeing as the Cloak accounts for why Thjazi and the Sundered Houses were after the same things: the Cloak watches the Houses closely to try and swoop in and get those assets for themselves.
He still seems to be on questioning the ritual, but given the caution we saw with a simple de-petrifying of Cyd, I'm inclined to think at this point it's just a professional caution of unknown/unpredictable magic. Especially a ritual in a theatre and on that large scale, given Bolaire's not-dissimilar first acts/original purpose. Plus none of the PCs or people they have access to currently designed the ritual, so they don't even know for sure what the specifics of what it does are, just theories, so again, professional caution doesn't strike me as unwarranted from Bolaire.
Murray is the one who threw out, rather apropos of nothing, that Thjazi might pop back up as a god because of the ritual since that's what a Sundered House would want for themself and she thinks Thjazi was stealing one of their rituals to do before them here. Bolaire wasn't even there for that one.
So yeah, Bolaire does have misconceptions about Thjazi (likely based in his blackmail treatment), but Murray is the one pushing the theories about Thjazi acting against what the rest know of him.
I forget the exact line, but people (and characters) were so quick to jump to Thjaziâs defense that I think they missed an important part of Murrayâs original point/question.
Murray did not suggest originally that Thjazi was purposefully working with the Sundered Houses. She was worried Thjazi had been tricked into working for the Sundered Houses.
She was concerned that somebody Thjazi trusted had been compromised (which had already happened at least once with Casimir) and that they had then gotten him to participate in the Sundered Housesâ plans without realizing.
At the time she first suggested this, the other two groups had not yet returned to Dol-Makjar. The Schemers just found out a ritual is even happening, they knew the paint (that they still donât understand) is part of it, they were pretty sure the play is part of it, and thatâs just about it. Murray in particular is frustrated with the lack of informationâ especially with Thjazi using some of his dying words to tell Hal to âhelp Murrayâ but she doesnât know with what! She doesnât know what Thjazi wanted her to do!
Sheâs frustrated and sheâs scared. Sheâs scared that if she guesses wrong at what Thjazi expected of her (without telling her!), that she will then be responsible for a ton of innocent people getting killed and responsible for the Sundered Houses seizing more power (and therefore responsible for all the suffering they cause with that power).
And in her fear and confusion, while examining every angle trying to sus out what the correct course is, her brain goes âwhat if Thjazi got tricked and he was unknowingly helping the Sundered Houses??â And then, when she voices this worry as âsomething we need to considerâ/an angle we need to prove right or wrong, Bolaire (who hates Thjazi) said it louder. And everyone reacted to Bolaire as if he were just trying to find a way for Thjazi to be a bad guy.
Murray is not as brash as her attitude sometimes indicates. Murray is a thinkerâ hell Murray works for an institution that is reinventing magic! They are researching and experimenting in order to create new spells. Murray takes all the information they have and turns it every which way in her brain to find ALL the possible ways the pieces might interact with each other. And sheâs not afraid to take the time to consider (and hopefully dismiss) the options that no one else wants to see as a possibility.
No one else who loves Thjazi is willing to sit with any possibilities that turn him into an agent for evil. They love him and he was a good person (to them at least) and therefore he would never. But this blinds them to Murrayâs point that properly guessing what the correct course of action is here hinges on the assumption that Thjazi was not tricked into doing things that have the opposite outcome as he intendedâ If we just blindly follow what we think his intentions were, we could be falling into a trap where we accidentally hurt people instead of helping them. (Besides the fact that having to guess at what he intended makes us vulnerable to being tricked/trapped ourselves regardless of whether Thjazi himself had been tricked or notâŠ.)
Bet you never seen a licorice bulbasaur. Fun fact, those little licorice candies are called âallsortsâ
Just watched Adam Conover (of Adam Ruins Everything) make such a solid point that I think we should spread far and wide. Yes, having AI write your emails is lazy, sure, but people love being lazy. We need to really emphasize that sending AI emails (or using AI responses on social media, or publishing AI flyers, or or or) is rude.
It's rude. You're making someone take their time to read something you couldn't bother to write. You're telling them they were so unimportant you couldn't be bothered to actually take the time to say something yourself. And frankly, you're lying about it while you're at it.
It's rude.
Itâs Tough Getting Older

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
A few of my favorite things
tagged by @littleblackraincloudofcourse
i. favorite flower - stargazer lilies, but i never get them bc they're toxic to cats. also a fan of violets, they dotted the yard where i grew up and i loved to pick them.
ii. favorite season - fall for sure. the colors, the smells, the crunchy leaves, the breezes skirling out of nowhere.
iii. favorite soup - cheddar broccoli
iv. favorite anime - hellsing (original not ultimate)
v. favorite sport - uhhhhhhhhh. uh. uhhh. gymnastics? i admire the strength and coordination. it's a very powerful sport.
vi. favorite ships - graythrax, graydon and anybody really, bagginshield, daforge, jaime x brienne, johnlock, frostiron, joxer x ares
vii. favorite holiday - halloween still i guess. not really a holiday person but that one has the best aesthetic. thanksgiving if it's just me and my partner.
viii. favorite soft drink - diet coke
ix. favorite sea creature - manatee
x. favorite number - i don't think i have one. am i missing out?
tagging @swordkitty @the-grimsqueaker @greencheekconure27 @groceryshoppingwithaghost @cenobitic-anchorite @morriganwarrior @ankahikoibaat
no pressure, as always, and anyone that wants feel free
A few of my favourite things!!
Thanks @lowkeyed1 :)
1. Favourite flower? Lavender! Its my favourite scent too.
2. Favourite season? Winter! I'm now in my element with it having been winter officially for 4 days now. I'm wearing my hoodie to work and I'm comfortable and I only start sweating when one of the others in the office puts the heater on.
3. Favourite soup? Chicken. My grandma's chicken soup specifically (she's dead now, but i try and recreate it sometimes). Also pea and ham! Thats good shit. And mushroom!! OH ITS WINTER WHICH MEANS ITS SOUP SEASON :D
4. Favourite anime? I got a list, can't pick one. Fairy Tail, Assassination Classroom, Erased and Full Metal Alchemist Brotherhood. I peaked in the mid 10's.
5. Favourite sport? No. I used to be obsessed with soccer as a kid but I have a movement based seizure disorder and that really puts a damper on your enthusiasm for physical activity let me tell you.
6. Favourite ships? Pirate ships đ. But no, in earnest I'm still on the Kit x Jade from Willow bandwagon. I haven't really shipped much for a long time.
7. Favourite holiday? As a working professional in Australia I'm a fan of Christmas. I get 10 days off and only have to use 3 days of my annual leave. Its good for a quick break.
8. Favourite soft drink? Vanilla coke! But also, very niche, the limited run of lime flavoured frozen fanta that Hoyts did back in about 2013. That was amazing. I think fanta did regular lime flavoured drink for a short time too, which was also delicious, but they took it away đ
9. Favourite sea creature? I was a fan of dolphins as a child, now I'm a fan of crabs.
10. Favourite number? 13. I think it has a bad rep. But any uneven number thats not divisible by 5 is fine by me.
I'll tag @daemonmatthias and @phoenixfire-thewizardgoddess if you want guys :)
A few of my favourite things!!
Thanks @the-grimsqueaker :)
1. Favourite flower? Hibsicus, daffodils, and tulips
2. Favourite season? Honestly, I'm living somewhere with proper seasons for this first time so right now I'm still just really loving seasons.
3. Favourite soup? baked potato :)
4. Favourite anime? I uh..... really have not watched very many. SpyxFamily
5. Favourite sport? I figure skated competitively as a child, and my mom used to teach gymnastics, so I enjoy watching those most because I actually understand what it takes to be able to Do That.
6. Favourite ships? I don't really engage with content around ships the way most people do on here. I just am like "oh, this couple is interesting" while watching the media. So uh, Imogen/Laudna and Orym/Dorian are the two that come to mind first?
7. Favourite holiday? I like just about any excuse to celebrate or spend time with loved ones. Halloween is always fun, but also moving further from home has left us not usually able to visit parents for thanksgiving and the friendsgiving we've started attending is a lot of fun.
8. Favourite soft drink? I don't really drink soda anymore, but I do miss the taste sometimes of a real-sugar dr pepper, and my husband introduced me to Specher's and their cream soda is the BEST.
9. Favourite sea creature? octopuses! they're fascinating.
10. Favourite number? I don't really have one, so I always default to 42 when people ask.
I'll tag @fuzzyhairedfreak and @hauntedandhostile if you want guys :)
Copyright governs who has the "right" to produce and distribute "copies" of books/music/movies/creative works. This is where fair use doctrine applies, because most creative works are referential by nature.
Weird Al is allowed to parody everything because he's operating under copyright law, not trademark law.
Trademark governs who can "trade" under what "mark" i.e. the brand identity of a company. Companies don't own their trademarked word forever, but they maintain the exclusive right to sell things under that brand in their specific market sector. Patagonia doesn't own the name of a geographical region, they just own the right to be the only company using that name to sell clothing and outdoor gear.
A drag queen name can be a parody of a clothing and outdoor gear company.
A company's trademarked logo can be used in parody creative works, with more leeway if it's not for commercial purposes. Trademark parody is allowed! Patagonia has been aware of and allowed Pattie Gonia's trademark parody for years.
Trademarks are specific to market sector. Actress Chase Infiniti could start a makeup line named after herself and her trademark would not infringe on the Infiniti car brand because they are different markets and there is no risk of confusion. Pattie Gonia could probably trademark her name to sell frozen veggie burgers and Patagonia would not care.
Drag queen Jan Sport did a collab with JanSport bags. What Jan Sport almost certainly did not do is independently apply to register "Jan Sport" as a trademark in order to sell bags on her own, because that would infringe on JanSport's own trademark in the bag market sector.
What Pattie Gonia is not allowed to do -- the thing that Pattie Gonia actually did do and is being sued for -- is apply to register "Pattie Gonia" as a trademark to sell clothing, because apparently Pattie is in talks with North Face and HydroFlask to sell "Pattie Gonia"-branded gear. These companies probably won't finalize anything unless Pattie shows that she actually owns the trademark. Unfortunately, "Patagonia" is already a registered trademark in the clothing market sector, and these two names are too similar to exist in the same sector (see: "likelihood of confusion" legal standard).
Your drag queen name can parody a clothing company. You can parody the trademarked logo of a clothing company. But you cannot use the same name to then go on to also become a clothing company.
In order to maintain their own trademark, Patagonia must sue for trademark infringement. If they don't sue, and Pattie Gonia gets her own trademark, Pattie could sue Patagonia for infringement on her trademark. You can see why Patagonia won't be dropping this suit no matter how much you harass them.
Yes, Pattie's legal fees to fight this will cost more than the $1 she's being sued for. Pattie could also not fight this, withdraw her trademark application, not spend any money, and carry on being an environmental activist drag queen named Pattie Gonia. She would probably be better off making nice with Patagonia in the hopes of a Jan Sport-esque deal where Pattie designs an exclusive fabric and Patagonia maintains the trademark, but apparently Pattie's legal team has been sassing off to Patagonia in their communications for years, has applied for a trademark they should 100% know they'll never get, and has now decided to play the victim on social media just in time for Pride month, so I don't know how likely that is. I guess we'll see!
This is mostly correct, but Iâd like to offer a small correction. The product deal with Hydroflask and North Face apparently occurred in 2022, and HydroFlask got Patagonia involved to make sure everything was in the clear. It seems like Patagonia was very agreeable about everything at the time, and only asked that Pattie Gonia and her partners avoid using the Patagonia logo and font or similar images, and to avoid putting the words âPattie Goniaâ on any products. This is the email exchange from 2022, from the recent Patagonia trademark complaint, including Pattie Gonia apparently agreeing to the limitations.
The new conflict is from Pattie Gonia using the Patagonia imagery and the Pattie Gonia name on her own merchandise. This is the email Patagonia sent, with the images they feel conflict with the 2022 agreement.
Pattie responded to that by disagreeing that she had broken any agreement, and also obliquely threatening to expose Patagonia for making tactical gear for the US military?
Itâs possible that Patagonia understood the terms from 2022 to be a good-faith ongoing agreement about keeping the brands separate, and Pattie interpreted it as an agreement limited to the now-ended North Face and Hydroflask collaboration. Itâs also possible that Pattie Gonia didnât believe she was actually agreeing to anything at all, since her responses were very neutral, though positive in tone, up until 2025. The email chain does, however, show what I think is a very clear effort on Patagoniaâs part to protect their trademark while also showing support and goodwill towards Pattie in her use of the Pattie Gonia stage persona.
Reblogging this because I think it provides an interesting explanation of the legal side of this whole mess, but to be clear the Only Correct Reaction here is to understand that copyright and trademark are Fucking Stupid, not to get out your torches and pitchforks to defend teh poor innocent cowpowation from a scawy yucky-wucky dwag queen.
Pattie selling shit with her stage name on it Really Obviously isnât going to have any negative effect on the continued lining of Patagonia CEO pockets, as if that even fucking matters, and no amount of waxing poetic about âwell they have to đ„șđ„șđ„șâ is going to make me say anything other than âfucking stupid if true thenâ.
Yâall gotta stop jumping to defend corpos just because blah blah trademarks blah blah copyrights. As the famous post implies yâall are not temporarily embarrassed vivzipops.
You will struggle to defend Pattie Gonia with the argument that "trademarks are fucking stupid" when this all started because Pattie applied for a trademark of her own.
In terms of whose pockets are being lined:
Rather than selling the company or taking it public, Mr. Chouinard, his wife and two adult children have transferred their ownership of Patagonia, valued at about $3 billion, to a specially designed trust and a nonprofit organization. They were created to preserve the companyâs independence and ensure that all of its profits â some $100 million a year â are used to combat climate change and protect undeveloped land around the globe.
The unusual move comes at a moment of growing scrutiny for billionaires and corporations, whose rhetoric about making the world a better place is often overshadowed by their contributions to the very problems they claim to want to solve.
At the same time, Mr. Chouinardâs relinquishment of the family fortune is in keeping with his longstanding disregard for business norms, and his lifelong love for the environment.
(NYT Gift Link)
Since 2022, 100% of Patagonia's profits have gone to climate and environmental causes. They have completely restructured the ownership of the company so that this will continue in perpetuity.
I like Pattie Gonia and I admire her environmental activism, but Patagonia's $100 million toward climate causes every year forever has orders of magnitude more impact. I support Patagonia maintaining its trademark however necessary to continue this work, and it is actually deeply distasteful to me that Pattie is willing to spin this routine trademark suit as "a corporation trying to erase an activist" when there is very obviously no path to legal victory and the only possible outcome is reputational damage to the only major corporation literally ever that has been singularly, intentionally, innovatively, and against all odds structured to give a fuck. Patagonia is a unicorn among corporations and we are starting a smear campaign against it for what. Selling slightly different t-shirts? Crab bucket ass activism.
"GUESS."
I think murderbot would rage earlier in the emotion checks if it were clippy asking it
(picture done by @piratedllama bc I don't have the Photoshop ability)
when a government bans young people from using social media, and then categorises messenger apps like Signal and WhatsApp as "social media", they are pushing those young people toward using text messages, a fundamentally insecure form of communication. texts are not encrypted in transit and can be read by both the sender's mobile carrier and the recipient's. that also means they can be leaked in data breaches, subpoenaed, or just handed over willingly to law enforcement at the carriers' discretion.
hmm. I wonder why governments might want this
this is not JUST about destroying kids' privacy by the way, although that is bad on its own! but think about it: if you can push everyone to spend their formative social years communicating through an insecure protocol, most of them are not going to do the work of moving to a secure one the moment they're legally allowed! banning everyone under 16 from Signal and WhatsApp creates a whole population of people more likely to continue, for the rest of their lives, to communicate using a tool the government can access at the drop of a hat
azune having the craziest 36 hours ever like investigate the site of a massacre, watch a partial resurrection, get lightly flirted with by the heavily grief-stricken guy you do not like after lightly blackmailing him, go to work, watch like 70% of your coworkers get fired, accidentally make your new fascist boss interested in you, tell your friend said fascist boss might know your history as a child soldier and so you might die, before you can even process also find out the man who you followed into battle that was kind of your father figure may have intentionally not tried to escape at his public execution, realize itâs a non-zero he did that to spare your life, try to hold it together, get called out by all your clearly worried allies for looking 2 seconds away from a mental breakdown, see something you should not be able to see but can due to your magical powers, manipulate a religious fascist into liking you, have a sobbing emotional breakdown about your father figureâs death in the home you once stayed in because he sent you there, start building the beginnings of a mercenary spy network, go back to work, find out you have to investigate that same massacre but this time itâs because your new fascist boss is asking you to, realize you have built your entire life around the fires set by your father figure and heâs now dead, start getting the kindling to set some fires of your own.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
i think the key difference between george lucasâs star wars and disneyâs star wars is that lucas is a man with an ideology. someone with a point of view, and all that entails. which comes with ideas of revolution, anti-imperialism, challenging the status quo, cultural appropriation and racist stereotypes. complex and contradictory ideas because thatâs how artists are: complex and complicated people. disney is not. disney is a corporation. a corporation canât have ideology, because ideology defeats the purpose of profit. and when the only thing you do is to turn on the movie manufacturing machine before you sit down and plan what ideas are you trying to convey to the audience, then your results are going to be washed out corporate garbage. and because when youâre a giant corporation who only cares about selling to the widest audience possible, you canât take sides. you canât decide on an idea. because you want to sell your product to people who are on the entire political spectrum. which results in movies without ideology, without purpose, without soul.
I have been looking for this post for years after I came across it and itâs finally here and I need to reblog this because it is absolutely and entirely accurate.
#as I always say: lucas was making a samurai film and a ww2 flying ace film and a western film and adding laser swords#because he fundamentally LIKED samurai films and dambusters films and westerns and 40âs adventure serials#but disney are making a âstar wars filmâ and adding nothing because it already had laser swords and they have nothing else to say#xerox of a xerox baybeeeee (via harrietvane)
Okay but imagine being the team of Eridian scientists tasked with keeping Erid's Only Human alive for as long as possible while the whole planet's environment is literally trying to kill him. And then Rocky shows up and is like:
âGrace says he would like half of dome to be water.â
âOh, is necessary for humans to have large amounts of water question?â
Small Eridian equivalent of a sigh. âNo. Not needed for life. In fact Grace will die if he falls in water and does not get out.â
âTell him we give him water in containers that won't kill him. Lots lots lots of water on Erid for Grace to drink.â
âNo. Grace say he want water on ground. Also want it with excess sodium chloride compound so it will be unhealthy for drink.â
âWHY QUESTION???â
To celebrate Erid getting their sun back on track, Grace asks for some alcohol. There's a small amount left from the Hail Mary and Rocky offers to take it to the science Eridians to see if they can synthesise more.
âGrace want this liquid for celebration.â
âOf course.â They scan it. âYou have wrong liquid. This contain compounds which are poisonous for humans.â
âYes yes yes. Grace say humans like feeling of being slightly poisoned.â
âWHY QUESTION?????â
Grace is like one of those extremely finicky tropical fish who instantly die if not kept in extremely specific conditions.
Only here the fish can talk and keeps asking you to make it vodka.