I am continuing to advocate for you as I can. You may not be able to see these right now, but these are links to share for tear gas, eye injuries, stopping serious wounds from bleeding. I'll write/copy important info below.

Stopping blood loss (paraphrased from stop the bleed video):

Expose wound to see where bleeding is coming from

Use a t-shirt, cloth, or gauze to cover the wound

Use TWO HANDS, one pressed over the other, and apply DIRECT PRESSURE to the wound

Use your body weight if you need to!

If the wound is large, you can pack the wound with your cloth/gauze, then apply direct pressure as stated above.

What to do if your eye is injured by a rubber bullet or other projectile:

Don’t touch your eye.

Don’t rub your eye.

Stay upright and keep your head up.

Place a hard shield around your eye. Holding or taping a temporary eye shield, such as a paper cup or Styrofoam cup, may work in an emergency.

Do not let the shield touch the surface of the eye.

If the eye ruptures or breaks open, the eye’s contents must be saved. Keep the shield on your eye and get to an emergency room or call your ophthalmologist immediately.

If you are exposed to tear gas, take the following steps right away:

Get away from the tear-gassed area as quickly and safely as possible.

Flush your eyes with lots of clean water or eyewash (available at most pharmacies).

Remove any clothing near your face.

Seek fresh air.

Seek higher ground (tear gas is heavier than air).

Blink frequently to promote tearing.

Do not rub your eyes (rubbing might spread crystals of the chemical on the eye’s surface).

Remove your contact lenses.

Get medical help right away.

If you are exposed to pepper spray:

Don’t touch the eye area. Pepper spray is oil-based, so touching the area will spread the oil.

Blink frequently to help flush your eyes.

Flush your eyes with lots of clean water or eyewash (available at most pharmacies). Contrary to what you may have heard, milk is not recommended for flushing the eyes because it’s not sterile. A small study compared five treatments (Maalox, 2% lidocaine gel, baby shampoo, milk, water) and found no difference in pain relief.

An Albuquerque man is charged with a hate crime and police are seeking to seize his guns after he allegedly smashed the windows at a synagogue and the Jewish Community Center within a half-hour span Tuesday.

Rex Crofton, 25, is also charged with desecration of a church and two counts of criminal damage to property over $1,000. He was booked into the Metropolitan Detention Center on Wednesday. His family could not be reached and it was unclear if he has an attorney.

Prosecutors filed a motion to detain Crofton until trial.

"Defendant wanted to bring rage and violence to a place of peace and comfort, and was fortunate to only damage security doors," according to the motion. "We cannot know what kind of destruction or injury Defendant would have caused if he had been able to enter the building."

On Thursday, an Albuquerque police officer petitioned for an Extreme Risk Firearm Protection Order to remove several firearms, including rifles and handguns, from Crofton's home, according to court records. The officer cited the vandalism and past domestic violence cases against Crofton along with his reported diagnosis of bipolar disorder and multiple personality disorder.

In an interview with an FBI agent, Crofton's family said he began to express "extreme antisemitic views" in the past year and had most of his social media accounts banned due to such posts.

Relatives told the agent that, an hour before the vandalism, Crofton was "in a state of mania" and said he was "going to kill Jews," according to court records. Relatives told the agent that a half-hour after the vandalism he texted them "I just hit two synagogues in 5 minutes," then added "send the cops my way I'd love to kill all of them."

About 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, a 911 call came in reporting that a man smashed the bullet-resistant front doors of Congregation Albert synagogue on Louisiana NE, just south of Montgomery, according to a criminal complaint filed in Metropolitan Court. The rabbi told officers that a man arrived in a silver car, smashed the windows and "flipped off" the synagogue before leaving.

Police said the facility's director estimated the glass doors would cost between $100,000 and $200,000 to replace but could not access surveillance footage. FBI agents arrived and told the officer their "presence was no longer required."

About 10 minutes after the first call, a second 911 call reported that a man with an ax had broken the front doors of the Jewish Community Center on Wyoming NE, just south of Academy. Witnesses told police a man in a silver car began attacking the front doors with a sledgehammer before fleeing from security.

A security guard told them they chased the man into the parking lot and used pepper spray on him before he drove off, according to the complaint. The security guard estimated the damage to the glass at around $40,000.

Police said surveillance video showed a man speed into the parking lot and begin striking the front doors with "an unknown object" that officers believed was a crowbar. Detectives ran the license plate of the car and it came back as registered to Crofton.

Yup, definitely sounds like death cult behavior.

And it's stunning how SCARED people are of Jews that fight back. Who fall down rabbit holes of Jewish Magic and conspiracy theories. Everyone is allowed and expected to fight back, except for us. They EXPECT us to just lay down and die, and hate us when we don't.

Well, no more. Or at the very least, we're going down swinging (not only in Israel, but in communities around the world).

Don't lose heart, if you're reading this. This is a proud moment.

let’s pretend for a second that y’all win. you destroy the state of israel, kill all the jews, and reclaim “palestine”—what happens then?

You're willingly backing a guy that hasn't even won the fucking primary yet as The Guy to beat Collins and make her seat blue. But when he suddenly decides to do similar shit like Collins or worse, then what?

Photographers and people are kept unknown due to the security of the protesters' identity.

A man sits on an office chair in the middle of the street, after setting a governmental office on fire; Ilaam city.

A man celebrating their victory after setting a governmental grocery store on fire. (The bags of "7$ rice per month" are torn and that is rice all over the ground. "We are protesting, not begging"); Malekshahi county

An arrestd young boy in the police car, feeling victorious even when he's arrested; location unknown.

A man using a gas-filled fire extinguisher to set the police on fire; Hormozgan.

Teenage girls sitting still in front of the police; city unknown.

A girl and a boy, standing in front of the police together, location unknown. (Quality enhanced by AI)

A man sitting in front of the armed police, alone. Location unknown. (Quality enhanced by AI)

people of Abdanaan celebrating their victory after taking over a governmental state, holding up a man sitting on an office chair.

3 of the photos above are enhanced by AI so the details are visiblble, but no other changes.

A doctor in London said something on television last week that ought to have been a national scandal. Somehow, it wasn’t.

He told ITV News that colleagues of his had said that if an Israeli arrived in the emergency room, dying, they would not treat him. They wouldn’t refuse his referral to their care. They’d purposely let him die on the gurney, on the principle of where he was born.

The doctor goes by Baruch. He would only give his first name. He and his wife, Daniella, are packing up their home in Golders Green and moving to Israel, and the ITV crew filmed them doing it. He mentioned, almost in passing, that he had also seen Jewish patients refused kosher meals. The Department of Health called his account “shocking” and admitted, in writing, that the medical regulatory system is failing to protect Jewish patients and staff.

Hold the part about the dying patient for a second, because it is the whole story in miniature.

A hospital works on one promise. The person who comes through the door gets treated. You do not check his passport. You do not poll the room about his politics. The promise is older than any of us, and it is the reason a stranger will let another stranger cut into his chest.The Hippocratic Oath that all doctors swear to. When a doctor decides that a nationality is grounds to withhold care, that oath hasn’t just been broken. It has been abandoned by the people who need to keep it the most.

That is what makes the medical version of antisemitism different from everything else in the news. You can argue forever about flags and slogans, about what a particular chant really means when ten thousand people sing it while marching in a Jewish neighborhood. You cannot argue about a man bleeding out in front of you. The case is closed before it opens.

Baruch is not imagining the weather around him. The same week his interview aired, Lord John Mann published a sixty-page review of antisemitism in the UK National Health Service (NHS.) It found that Jewish staff “suffer in silence,” that they face what the report calls routine ostracism, and that Jewish staff are the only religious group in the NHS for whom discrimination from colleagues is rising rather than falling. Some are thinking of leaving the service. The government accepted the recommendations and promised new training and standards. Good. But training is a plan for people who haven't yet made up their minds. It does nothing about the colleague who already decided some patients aren't worth saving.

In April, the Jewish Chronicle profiled three British doctors who had already left the NHS for Israel, among them a young pediatrician from north-west London and a GP who said plainly that she could not have coped with the antisemitism her Manchester colleagues were living with. Across the Atlantic, Dr. Emmanuel Moss, chief of cardiac surgery at Montreal’s Jewish General Hospital and one of Canada’s leading robotic heart surgeons, has resigned and is moving to Atlanta. He cited the climate in the city, where synagogues have been firebombed and bullets were fired at a yeshiva.

Look at the job titles. A cardiac surgeon. A children’s doctor. The clinicians you want on the schedule when it is your kid on the table at two in the morning. These are not people who spook easily, and they are not cheap or quick to replace. A surgeon takes well over a decade to train. When that is who decides to go first, you are not watching people flee an inconvenience. You are watching them flee an actual risk.

Here is the honst part, and it cuts against the alarm. By the raw numbers, there is no exodus. The Institute for Jewish Policy Research looked at the data this spring. In 2025, 742 British Jews made aliyah, the highest count in over forty years. But that figure still sits inside the normal range of the last two decades, which runs from about four hundred to about seven hundred a year. Roughly one Israeli moves to Britain for every British Jew who leaves for Israel. JPR’s director put it flatly: there is no Jewish exodus from the UK, at least not yet. So if you want to file all of this under noise, the spreadsheet will let you.

The spreadsheet is measuring the wrong thing. A census counts volume. This was never about volume. It is about composition, about which people are the first to quietly conclude they have no future somewhere. When the early movers are the surgeons and the paediatricians, the number on the page can stay small while the signal screams. The canary in the coal mine was never impressive by weight, either.

Britain and America, of all places, should be able to read this signal because they were once the lucky recipients of the same event running the other way.

In the 1930s, Germany and Austria purged their Jewish physicians. First, the 1933 civil service law pushed them out of public positions. Then, the regime forbade Jewish doctors from treating non-Jewish patients, and by 1938, it had stripped their medical licenses outright. The doctors did not vanish. They got on boats. A great deal of them landed in London and New York and rebuilt Anglo-American medicine and science over the following half-century. The countries that opened the door spent the next hundred years collecting the dividend.

Germany’s own healthcare measurably degraded once so many of the healers were gone, with child and maternal health indicators sliding in the wrong direction. The lesson is not subtle. A government can revoke its doctors' licenses for who they are. It cannot revoke the illnesses those doctors were treating. The patients stay. The expertise leaves. The gap between the two is filled with funerals.

What is happening now is that same experiment, this time running in gentler register. Nobody is passing a law. No license is being torn up. The pressure is ambient and plausibly deniable. A kippah that comes off before the ward round. A colleague who muses that some patients aren’t worth the trouble. A regulator the government itself concedes is not doing its job. Doctors are trained to detect diseases from their earliest signs. That’s exactly what they are doing, and it’s making them choose to leave.

The cost is not theoretical. The NHS is carrying roughly 100,000 vacant posts. More than four in ten of its licensed doctors are qualified abroad. On any given day, the service is busy persuading physicians in Lagos and Manila to uproot their lives and come to fill a British ward. In that same season, it is handing the doctors a quiet list of reasons to go. A health system that imports clinicians by the planeload while supplying its own with reasons to leave is losing a race it set up against itself.

This is the cost that gets lost when the conversation stays on antisemitism as a question of feelings and offense. The Jewish doctor who leaves does not take only himself. He takes the operations he would have performed, the residents he would have trained, and the night shifts he would have covered for a colleague whose child was sick. The loss is borne by whoever needed that surgeon and now waits longer, or does not get seen, and will mostly never know the trade that was made on his behalf.

this has been mercilessly review bombed and called “propaganda” despite it being documented footage from that day and comprising the testimony of survivors and responders. I can’t imagine any other victims of such atrocities or any other documentary subject being maligned this way.

please don’t traumatize yourselves by watching if you do not feel able to, we all know what happened and we’ve been grappling with that terror and pain ceaselessly, but if you do want to bear witness or support these survivors, victims, and filmmakers, amplify it however you can.

Mentioning the hostages is propaganda.

Saying the hostages should be returned is propaganda.

Saying Hamas killed civilians is propaganda.

Saying Hamas raped people is propaganda.

Saying Hamas took hostages is propaganda.

Saying any of the above was bad is propaganda.

All of the above is also justifiable resistance.

If you disagree with any of the above, you are justifying genocide.

Probably if any civilians died, the IDF killed them.

Hamas attacked because Zionism, not because Jews.

Whatever Hamas did do means that Israel was oppressing Palestinians in ways that are equally bad or even worse.

Palestinians tried peaceful resistance. It didn't work. This was their only option.

Hamas attacked to Free Palestine. Israel attacked to commit genocide.

Nazis don't hate and want to eliminate Jews, they are Jews.

A concentration camp isn't a place where a marginalized group is imprisoned for medical experimentation, slave labor, psychological torture ("re-education"), and frequent arbitrary murder for funsies.

A concentration camp is a war zone where you can't cross the border without the permission of the neighboring country, which is charging $5,000-$10,000 per person who wants to leave.

Egypt charging refugees thousands of dollars to leave during a war is not war profiteering; it's fine; we don't need to protest it or demand it stops. We just need to help with all the GoFundMes we can.

Colonialism isn't when one country invades others, defeats them in warl

Poland didn't start the Holocaust with 3,300,000 Jews and kill 3,056,000 of them. Certainly not partly because the Polish government and civilians joyfully helped the Nazis hunt down almost every single Jew in the country. Poland DEFINITELY didn't make it illegal in 2018 to say that Poland shared any responsibility "for Nazi crimes committed by the Third Reich."

Obviously, the truth is that the 148,000 Jews who emigrated from post-Holocaust Poland are privileged white settler-colonialist oppressors; made up the vast majority of Israel's population (which by 1949 was 1,174,000); and should just go back to Poland (where there are currently about 5,000 Jews left).

Colonialism itself isn't when a powerful country invades others, uses genocidal rape, torture, and murder on everyone it doesn't enslave, and sends its resources back to the empire. That's just silly.

Colonialism is when people who have been enslaved, raped, tortured, murdered, and chased from country to country in between, for hundreds and hundreds of years, flee back to their homeland.

That's also white supremacy, surprisingly.