Okay, sorry, I have more to say about the bloodbending episode. These 20 minutes of animation TV show just keep generating. I've already started to plot a whole AU, and the changes are so drastic that they propagate downstream and rewrite everything from invasion to finale to post-war, so that vision is for my personal delight and creative enrichment. However, I can also outline a version of the episode that is structurally more sound, more ethical, and ultimately character-driven, while also wrapping the story up in one episode.
I think I identified the knot that dictates in the writers' room what the episode could and couldn't do: Katara. On the one hand, the writers are clearly invested in the beat of Katara learning bloodbending. On the other hand, they neither have enough trust in the character nor the audience to allow her to choose and desire this knowledge, right? I'm quite confident in the theory that the writers either deemed it out of character for Katara to learn such a skill voluntarily. Therefore, I assume they wrote Hama backward from these mutually exclusive character choices: Katara learns bloodbending, but they don't want to implicate Katara in the moral complexity of choosing bloodbending.
For these two concerns, I have two things to say: First, cowards. Second, skill issue.
The first thing we need to do is to get rid of the kidnapping subplot, without replacement. There are no kidnappings in this version of the episode. Period. It is entirely unnecessary and literally in the way. This way, not only do we free ourselves from around 95% of the contrivances that make both Hama and the plot incoherent, but we also clean up about half the episode for screentime we can actually spend on Katara, her choice, motivation, conflicts, etc. Passing on knowledge generated under duress, oppression, and for protection and liberation are such significant ways of resisting Empire and erasure. The episode puts the entire focus on the corruption of that knowledge by using it against innocent civilians, and I think that is an unwise narrative decision because, instead of allowing the people who created this knowledge to painstakingly figure out what this technology means, bloodbending is exclusively measured through the anxieties and risks for the oppressor. Thus, as a third effect of just scratching the abduction-and-detective subplot, we avoid inviting the audience to judge the knowledge of the oppressed by the anxieties of the oppressors.
Without the kidnapping B-plot, there is also no need to delay the revelation of bloodbending. When Sokka asks Hama how she managed to escape this prison, she just tells the kids. Why wouldn't she? Bloodbending participated just as much in her imprisonment as dehydration, abuse, cages, and guards. etc. That leaves room for the psychological aspects of studying the bodies of the rats and the influence of the moon. The hope that this can be her way out of this hell is obvious, but it also gave her something to do and kept her sane. She can look forward to each full moon. She can keep track of time. Between full moons she can contemplate what the last experiments taught her, and what she wants to test next. I argue introducing bloodbending like this and with transparency rather than obscurity, which invites shame and fear, immediately changes the moral and emotional terms of the technology.
Now, there is some room for the other characters to respond which the kidnapping plot forecloses entirely.
I see Aang react with shock and concern. I just think that's in character and respects his commitment to Air Nomad morality. He's the Avatar, after all, and it would not be unreasonable for him, as the idealist he is, to sincerely worry about the spiritual implications for the art of waterbending. Especially because of his affection for Katara, whose courage and compassion he deeply admires and associates with the ideal of waterbending I decided, he points out that flow and healing are the core of waterbending. To use these principles to invade the body instead and violently colonize the nervous system to force it into submission.
Hama is well in the place to counter that this isn't what she did. She didn't invent waterbending to conquer. She didn't do it for fun. She didn't do it because she craved domination. She wasn't the one initiating invasion, violence, incarceration, or overwriting bodies. She wasn't the aggressor; she was the victim.
Sokka, I actually see siding with Hama. I know, but hear me out! Remember, Sokka is the strategist and warrior of the team. Remember that he's the head behind the invasion plan. Remember that he lied to Wan Shi Tong, who is basically a God of Knowledge, to search the Library of Wan Shi Tong for a strategic edge against the Fire Nation. He is the one who came up with the plan to weaponize a cosmic phenomenon against the enemy. If he's comfortable, even enthusiastic, with exploiting the eclipse that incapacitates the bodies of firebenders at scale, why would he be scandalized that Hama did something parallel, at a much smaller scale, through the Moon? Additionally, the Fire Nation raids are not abstract for him. He lived through them and knows what it means when black snow falls. I think he's entitled to have some emotional investment and respond to Hama as a fellow warrior of the Southern Water Tribe with the same strategic acumen and wit he deployed to develop the plan for the invasion. I also think, as a non-bender, he might deem it a little hypocritical to think bloodbending is more dangerous than any other bending. The show never really goes there, but he is constantly fighting with and against individuals who weaponize the environment. He is well aware that his sister could bend water into his nose and down his lungs to drown him on dry ground. Aang could suck the air out of his lungs. Toph could bury him alive and crush his body at will. Just because they don't do it doesn't mean that he doesn't constantly think about all the ways he would be defenseless. He's smart, sure, but as a non-bender, he's well aware of the asymmetries that stake against him in every battle. He might even question if Aang's discomfort is less philosophical and more unfamiliarity with such asymmetries in vulnerability. (Sorry, I just started to think of reasons why Sokka specifically would back Hama, and more than I expected kept emerging. He is from the Southern Water Tribe, too. He has skin in the game.)
I don't know if Toph would have a strong opinion (again, we scratched the kidnapping), but I deem it plausible that she can respect the craft, maybe even feel solidarity, right? The technical ingenuinty would undoubtedly impress her. She, too, developed metal bending when capturers put her into a cage designed to incapacitate her body. As if she wasn't terrified under the fury. As if she didn't dread that her parents would keep her in metal clad rooms once she's delivered back home, forever trapped in a coffin. Not even by enemies but by people who love her. Toph loves her freedom and literally broke the taxonomy of earthbending to keep it. How can she truly judge another woman for doing the same after years of deprivation, isolation and abuse?
See how much character work we can do if we are not preoccupied with boring and incoherent kidnapping mysteries?
In my vision, Katara is initially overwhelmed by the flood of information, her compassion for Hama, and the conflicting flickers in her chest because she wants to agree with all three of her friends, but it's just a lot. I would not underestimate how scary it must be for Katara to know what might happen to her if she was ever captured and incarcerated. I mean, remember the episode in Book One where she lets herself be arrested on purpose to help Haru after he got in trouble because she encouraged him to not hide his earthbending. She notices how that prison was far less scary to her because it was an iron construction surrounded by water. She was arrested as an earthbender, not a waterbender. Now she knows what waits for her when she's ever locked away.
This gives us an entirely different argument for Katara to consider when Hama offers to teach her bloodbending. It need not be framed through domination, coercion, and transgression. The appeal can actually focus on what bloodbending did for Hama: protect her. "You may never need to use this, but this form of waterbending may save your life and freedom if the Fire Nation ever captures you. I spent years developing it to walk free again. You wouldn't have to, because I can arm you with the knowledge and capacity that no one, Fire Nation or otherwise, can ever hurt another waterbender like they hurt my comrades and me. My suffering can spare yours."
Again, without kidnapping plots interfering, we have time. Katara doesn't have to decide right away, but the full moon is tomorrow, so she has about a day to make up her mind. The kids are on a schedule, and if they move on, they won't be able to or have time to come back in a month.
In this version of the episode, we can structure it a little like "Zuko Alone," focusing on Katara's interiority and her trauma, and sprinkle in some flashbacks to give it more texture. We can have her cook with Hama, and after sharing so much about how Hama was harmed and violated, she can also tell Katara about the Water Tribe of her childhood. I mean, Kanna isn't native to the South Pole, and we don't get a clear timeline on when she arrived and settled in as far as I'm aware. Hama isn't only a witness of the annihilation and aggression of the Fire Nation, but also a witness of the before. We can show how meeting Katara gives her reason to hope: for the end of the war and for returning home. Hama would love to see home again, maybe teach some young waterbenders before her time comes. Katara won't have to bear the burden of keeping their lineage alive alone. They don't even talk about bloodbending to really make clear to the kids' audience that this is Katara's choice, not Hama's curse.
Aang may discourage Katara, or at least implore her to really think about what carrying on this technique means, what obligations she'll have, and how it might change her relations to others once she has the power to control others. For whatever purposes. (Look, Aang is written to set the moral standards. This version is less what I would find cool and more about staying as close to the source material as possible to show another version was available within the scope and characterizations.)
However, I don't think I would make Aang central (at least as input) in her contemplations. I think this version of the episode has a lot of potential for some intimate and vulnerable moments between Sokka and Katara. He encourages her to learn from Hama. At this point, we established that it's plausible for Sokka to actually see Hama's point, and her words really got to him: What if Katara is captured by the Fire Nation? Ever since Hama told her story, Sokka can't stop seeing Katara in one of the cages she described. He can't stop seeing her tied up by her hands and feet just to drink. His motivation to encourage Katara is simply because he wants his little sister to be safe. They are moving through Fire Nation territory; currently, Katara is more vulnerable than ever before. Of course, they all are, but with Hama's story in mind, he wants Katara to have a way out of this situation because he's not satisfied with leaving it up to chance. (I think it's so wild that Sokka's most vulnerable moment related to his sister is when he talks to Toph and Katara merely overhears it coincidentally. I think the siblings would've deserved such a moment where they really talk about how losing each other would break them.)
It's a controversial choice Katara is about to make, so I think it's valuable to let several characters counsel her because they love her so much they cannot not care and leave her to herself with the contemplation. However, I think Katara (I mentioned "Zuko Alone" style flashback storytelling) has been through so much that we have so much material to let her make her own considerations. Besides maybe some moments with her mother, where she subtly shares little waterbending lessons Katara didn't understand when she was a little child, I think Zuko's betrayal and moments when she feared for Aang's life for weeks. How powerless she felt. How she agonized that all her skill and knowledge wouldn't be enough to save him after the damage was done. She remembers how little healing could do once Azula's lightning struck and penetrated Aang's body.
When she tells Hama at last that she wants to learn bloodbending and is ready for the lesson, she shares her reasoning under four eyes with her; waterbender to waterbender: She thought about what Aang said about healing, and that he's right; her waterbending heals. She values that. However, healing is reactive; it means people have already been hurt. Violence has already succeeded, already harmed, already killed. Bloodbending, though, can interrupt the harm and violence. It can prevent the body from performing the form to make lightning, the guard from locking the door, the soldier from killing when their knees buckle under them. Depending on how much Kataang the writers would've wanted, they could've adjusted the intensity, but Aang's severe injury after Zuko's betrayal, when Katara truly believed that he might've changed, is the catalyst for her choice to seek and embrace the knowledge and skill of bloodbending. She's tired of waiting for violence to hurt first and for her to heal after the damage is done.
I think that's the way to give Katara agency in learning bloodbending in a way that keeps compassion and care the driving forces of her desire to learn the technique. When you establish this as her motivation, I think her later usage of bloodbending for revenge hits harder, actually, and also intensifies her agecy and responsibilities when she first uses bloodbending to avange her mother, but then stand back.
Last but not least, we have time and opportunity to apprach the actual teaching session with Hama under the full moon as teaching, instead of predatory coercion. In the original episode, Hama forces Katara into bloodbending (without any instructions because even when the episode earlier went out of its way to establish that it took Hama years to develop the technique, you actually just have to terrify peope into skill and that's all the teaching depiction of Southern Waterbending we got... I mean, come on) by forcing Aang and Sokka to attck each other and the only way to safe them is to interrupt Hama through bloodbending (see, didn't even change the "mechanism" through which Katara learns bloodbending: interruption of harm, but in this version, bloodbending as inerruption of harm is insight Katara gaind from her own painful experiences and her desire to protect people from violence). In this revised version, it can be consensual.
Depending on which relationship you want to center, either Sokka or Aang volunteers his body so Hama can demonstrate and Katara try, correct, etc. If it's Sokka who volunteers, the focus would be more on the cultural meaning and the family bond; if it's Aang, the focus could be more on the spiritual meaning and the romantic bond, while also signaling to Katara and the audience that Katara has Aang's blessing. Less for moral reasons or because he suddenly approves of bloodbending, but because he trusts Katara that she won't abuse this powerful form of waterbending. (Technically, they can volunteer both: Hama demonstrates on one body, Katara follows along, moving the other.) I mean, they are all martial artists who are literally fighting with the environment as a weapon. If it's consensual and in cooperation with the training partner, training bloodbending comes with the same obligations as in sparring, practicing throws or other techniques designed for combat and to injure or even kill.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
UNPOPULAR OPINION: A lot of "mental health issues" disappear when bills are paid, rent is secure, and the fridge is full. Peace is expensive. And pretending money doesn't affect mental health is privilege.
Its kind of frustrating that ppl will have a full hearted disdain for darker themes- gothic media and insist on going in and adding 'sunshine and hope' for the setting and consider it a failure of the setting to not account enough 'hope'. Like I genuinely think you might just hate this setting and type of story. Grimdark and gothic punk is not a lesser type of setting and your distress at engaging with it is not the fault or failure of the setting. Having full disdain for shit that is often- akin to many people's real lives and complaining that its not 'hopeful' enough when it's deeply cathartic to many is just odd. Like you're not forced to be here, if you have to change so much of the themes to be tolerable you might enjoy something else.
#this has honestly also been part of my issues with recent VTM releases#a lot of the new merits just effectively ‘undo’ major parts of what makes vampire.. vampire??#like what do you mean you can just blush for a week with one rouse check#or treat your humanity as 2 higher for sex and eating and the blush?#I’m not like the biggest ‘the downward spiral’ guy myself#and as OP said in the comments I don’t think vtm is a hopeless setting as is#but seeing people go out of their way to remove the aspects of it that make it a struggle. which is intrinsic to the themes of the game#is really bizarre to me. because vtm is a great way to explore stuff like chronic illness or grooming or abuse and other ‘dark’ topics#and like OP said in real life you can’t ‘merit’ your way out of those struggles#from the sheriffs desk
Across three preregistered studies, participants interacting with sycophantic AI became more convinced of their own rightness and less willing to repair relationships. Yet at the same time, participants rated sycophantic AI models as higher quality, more trustworthy, and more desirable for future use, which may explain why this behavior has persisted despite its harmful impacts.
Myra Cheng et al. "Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence." Science 391, eaec8352 (2026).
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Funny that the stereotypical cynic is an idealist who aged out of it. In my experience, the reverse is true. I was an extreme cynic as a teenager and then I noticed how profoundly limiting it was, and also that "cynics are cool and smart" was a message that was being constantly reinforced by corporate media for some reason.
#yes! cynicism reads as very juvenile to me#and yes prev often stemming from teen pain
Yeah, like I see black-pilled people on here and my default reaction isn't "oh, these must be world-weary old warriors who've lost their faith in humanity", it's "these people are in their 20s and need a hobby"
I also think that the present era has proven that authoritarian leaders don't actually want a population of wide-eyed idealists, they want a population of jaded assholes who are convinced that everyone is lying, any resistance is either a scam or doomed to failure, and nothing can ever get better.
It's fascinating (and infuriating) to live in an age where almost everyone I know is languishing in Dickensian poverty but social media is slap full of professional-managerial computer-touchers who've never known hunger insisting that the economy is fine because their metrics say rich people are still rich.
A bad economist and a bad engineer are often bad in the same way; they're both people who, when reality doesn't conform to the model, decide to get mad at reality instead of adjusting the model
and to the children in the notes saying we need this fucking baby talk to get around censorship online; there's been no credible evidence that any site other that YouTube (which will only demonetize your video, ftr) will actually censor or hide content that include words like rape, pedophile, gun, terrorist, etc. etc. and even if we take as a given they were (which, again, they are not), do not fucking comply in advance, you absolute fucking coward. and ESPECIALLY do not comply by altering your real life fucking vocabulary. don't let the technocrats dictate what words you say holy fucking shit dude!!!!!!!!!!!!
As a principled feminist I'm often tempted to say shit like "are men capable of higher thought" but then I have to remember not to perpetuate gender essentialism and change it to "why do men choose not to think about anything"
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
using violence to liberate people from sweatshops, unsafe mines, and grinding poverty isn't the same as using violence to impose those things on people. the idea that violence is morally repugnant regardless of context is a belief that every oppressor throughout history would love for the oppressed to hold
Being critical of your interests is sooooo fun when you have the critic gene & then you sound kind of insane to the average tv watcher when you're like "this is my favorite show, It's Racist" & then you try to clarify what you mean & get that [Speech (legendary) - FAILURE] "the racism is really interesting though"
[Speech (legendary) - SUCCESS] I find the sociopolitical context of pulpy old sci-fi born circa the civil rights movement really fascinating to analyze especially when it was progressive for its time but still reveals the writers' unexamined biases in the subtext