Disney Heroes x Creative HobbiesÂ
Stranger Things
we're not kids anymore.
Jules of Nature
taylor price
trying on a metaphor
Cosmic Funnies
Cosimo Galluzzi
Monterey Bay Aquarium

tannertan36
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
cherry valley forever

çĽćĽ / Permanent Vacation
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
wallacepolsom

romaâ

Kiana Khansmith
Not today Justin
Sweet Seals For You, Always
đŞź

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from Japan

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States

seen from Germany
@anonymousgeekhere
Disney Heroes x Creative HobbiesÂ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The Rabbiâs Cat (Le chat du rabbin) Directors: Joann Sfar & Antoine Delesvaux Studio: Autochenille | France, 2011
past-tense slogans
we were farmers
nationwide was on your side
You were in good hands
because you were worth it
only you couldve stopped forest fires
Stop reblogging this leave my notifs alone
Goncharov (1973)
Oh donât mind me im just doing some cinematography art studies of my favourite Katya moments ~

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Day thirty-one: Laura Palmer
Laura! Without her there would be no story, but who was she? I couldnât think of what to draw for this, because her character is (of course) only represented in the show through others, remembering her more for what they wanted her to be than how she truly was. It may sound silly because sheâs just a fictional character, but I wanted to draw something that felt true to her, rather than one of the empty tropes she embodies (prom queen/dead girl/doppelganger). I was working on previous prompts and watching the first episode of season two, where the Palmers, the Haywards, and Maddy are having their dinner party. Harriet read the poem she wrote about Laura and it struck me as being so authentic, and so unlike any other charactersâ tribute to her, that I decided to use that as my foundation. I am really happy with this, I feel like Iâve done right by Laura which is what I set out to do with this last drawing.
ID: A black and white drawing. In the right is Laura Palmer, wearing a skirt and a sweater with her back towards us, looking over her shoulder. There is a white glow around her figure. Beyond her is a dark forest with trees white trees and branches that fold over her. To the left is the text from the poem by Harriet Hayward.
Day thirty: A place both wonderful and strange
I wanted an excuse to draw Coop and Harry again so here they are, facing the mysteries of Twin Peaks together.
ID: A black and white drawing of Coop and Harry from the waist up. Cooper is wearing his trench coat and shines a flashlight into the distance. Harry has one arm around Coopâs shoulder and the other holding his rifle. Behind them are pine trees and text above and below that reads, âa place both / wonderful and strange.â
Day twenty-nine: MeanwhileâŚ
I was originally going to draw the *Black Lodge Laura hand gesture* for this prompt but I figured every Twin Peaks artist has done that (and Iâve done it in the past myself) so instead I decided to draw Coop and Laura hanging out in the Black Lodge. I donât know what happens with good Coop in the lodge since I refuse to watch the revival but in this universe, they are only here for a short while before Harry comes to their rescue <3
ID: A black and white drawing of Coop and Laura sitting side by side on the floor of the Black Lodge.
Day twenty-eight: Owl in dream
I thought I saw somewhere online that âWindom Earleâ was meant to be an anagram of âOwl in dreamâ BUT, I cannot find anything about that now, plus thereâd be an extra E that didnât fit so maybe I just made it up? Regardless, I did a drawing of Coop being haunted by dreamed up owls. âCooper, Iâd think youâd be afraid to go to sleep at night!â
ID: A black and white drawing. In the center is Cooper in his pajamas pulling himself out of bed and looking anxious. Behind the headboard is a larger than life owl with its wings outstretched and its tail feathers beneath the blankets of the bed.
apollo cuz i miss drawing him and kitharas

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
She's out there somewhere.
Reupload due to realizing that I wanted to adjust a lot.
Hang on, let me ply you with some cuteness to try to overwrite some of the bad:
Accidentally ended up adopting an anole that came with a plant shipment to my work. This is how my friends learned of it:
The lizard in question, Norbert Ovaltine (Norry) looking handsome then doing a mid-shed impression of Santa claus
Carrot, beloved kitten menace, going on an adventure and displaying that he has exactly 0 thoughts. Carrot's hobbies include disturbing Sasha and Esme's naps, thieving, and biting (with love).
Esme, noble chonk and sweet shy child, looking beautiful and filing her tail amongst the nerd books.
Sasha, a noisy baby who loves blankets and being with the humans. She even plays Magic with us.
Assassin snails to remove the problems, loaches and shrimp to clean up after, and a goth guppy to look good in the meantime.
All the critters of the house wish you joy and a peaceful dash!
OMG.
adorableness OVERLOAD
i am EXPLODING
adding in on the cat pic asks! :] technically not my cat but my roommates/best friends cat (her name is athena)
HOLY SHIT FROGGY HAT
Small fandoms when a movie that doesn't even exist has more fics on ao3 than they do
hey do you think you could expand a bit on separating the art from the artist? clearly youâve done it with jk rowling but what are your thoughts on it as a general idea?
okay, but youâre not going to like the answer.
hereâs the truth: you canât separate the art from the artist. not entirely. HP Lovecraft was an incredibly talented, but much more incredibly racist man. It would nice to say you donât agree with his views but you can enjoy his works without that leaking in butâŚ. well, Iâm afraid that would be misunderstanding his books entirely.
Consider, for a second, that Lovecraftâs works were horror stories about extradimensional alien monsters having mutant children with humans, they were about invasions from distant monsters, they were about the purity of quaint European towns being tainted. Consider how this may have all been inflicted by the fact that he just simply despised anybody who wasnât white. Consider how is opinions on âmixing the racesâ might fight into this; consider why being unable to maintain the âpurityâ of white Europe was the scariest thing of all to him.
This extends to Rowling too.
I would love to say we can just acknowledge that she is an awful, racist, antisemitic, transphobic person and then say âbut at least her books are good,â because, well, they are, arenât they? I would say so, for sure. But to suggest that one can separate her from them isâŚ. ridiculous.
Consider why an antisemitic woman wrote about a species of goblins who live among us, but who for the most part keep to themselvesand are maybe a little bit oppressed by the institution, but also hold all the cards, all the money, run the banks.
Consider why a racist woman would write about a species of slaves who loved being enslaved, who enjoyed working for no pay, and cleaning up after humans, with the only small caveat of that they didnât want to be beaten. Imagine that only the most radical of their species wanted to be free, and he still spent the rest of his life working for no pay and helping out a little white boy and his friends wherever he could. Consider why the only person in the story who thought they should be free, that they should have rights, was treated as an overzealous joke, who was acting against the wishes of those slaves who really LOVE being enslaved. Consider that Rowling went on to say that she kind of considers that girl to be black, now.
Consider why JK Rowling, an open and proud transphobe, wrote Rita Skeeter as having a large square jaw, thick âmanlyâ hands, and dressing incredibly gaudily with the most obvious fake nails and fake teeth and fake hair and fake everything. Consider why a woman who tweets about how trans women are âfoxes pretending to be hens to get in the hen houseâ might write this Rita Skeeter to then illegally transform her body in order to spy on children.
Harry Potter is full of Rowlingâs bigotry, start to finish. Not even tangentially, like, âoh the goblins are bad, Rita Skeeter is bad, the house elves are bad, but most of itâs good!â because the deeper you dig and the longer you think the more you realise the entire story is based on her prejudices.
Harry Potter pretends to be an aracial story about found family, but if that were true, why are Harryâs distant ancestors important to who he is today even in the seventh book? Why does Harry have to live with his cousin and aunt and uncle? Because magic inherently prefers blood ties. Whilst Rowling was writing a story that seemed to say, âyour heritage is not that important and doesnât make you better than othersâ she was still writing a story about a boy who got all of his money through his bloodline, who was protected by living with his bloodline, no matter how evil, who was uniquely able to stop Voldemort because his bloodline passed down the invisibility cloak for generations and generations. Any step Harry takes he is compared to his perfect parents who were exactly like him â he looks just like his father, but he has his motherâs eyes, you know! â consider WHY a woman who is racist mightâve written a story like this. A story that on its surface, condemns a blood caste, but still in every step it takes, validates the idea that blood is thicker than water, and your geneological origin is what makes you special.
You can enjoy Harry Pottwr, of course you can. There are fantastic parts. I love a small group of teenagers deciding to become anarchies rebels and train to fight against fascism in secret. I love the murder mystery plots, I love how the series tells kids that itâs a good thing to be brave, and a good thing to fight injustice, and a good thing to challenge the government. But I cannot separate it from its author because it is such a product of its author. All of the structures of the world, the way things work in the universe, and drenched in Rowlingâs beliefs, her bigotries. Of course they are: she made them.
Again. This doesnât mean you cannot enjoy it. But I think we are past the day where we can pretend that disavowing a bigoted author is enough, and that that somehow separates the text from its bigotry. I think we are past the day where we can pretend that Harry Potter isnât a deeply, inherently bigoted piece of media. Even the bits we love. I think we are beyond the day where we can truthfully pretend to separate it from her, because she is present through all of it. We MUST recognise its flaws. We MUST admit that she is in every part of it.
#this is a brilliant post that sets up an answer the anonâs question#which is that separating art from the artist isnât about ignoring who the author was#but rather ignoring what the author tells you their work means#rowling will never say her work contains the things rightful pointed out here#but she doesnât get to make that call#we all have eyes and can look for ourselves#and who she is is part of what we must look at (via @ratherembarrassing)
If you go back to read it, which I did recently and only got through book 4 before quiting, you also see she has a lot of internalized mysoginy and loads of xenopobia. All female characters except for the love interests basically only nag, screech, yell and generally badger the male characters who keep rolling their eyes at them. And most of the adults in Harryâs life keep warning him away from foreigners. Expecially âgoodâ characters like Hagrid and the Weasleys. Again, this isnât to say you canât enjoy HP, I still masivelly identify as a Hufflepuff after all, but it does mean that you need to be aware of its faults and also that it is super fricking obvious that JKR was racist, sexist, xenophobic, and transphobic throughout the time it took her to write the books.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
hey do you think you could expand a bit on separating the art from the artist? clearly youâve done it with jk rowling but what are your thoughts on it as a general idea?
okay, but youâre not going to like the answer.
hereâs the truth: you canât separate the art from the artist. not entirely. HP Lovecraft was an incredibly talented, but much more incredibly racist man. It would nice to say you donât agree with his views but you can enjoy his works without that leaking in butâŚ. well, Iâm afraid that would be misunderstanding his books entirely.
Consider, for a second, that Lovecraftâs works were horror stories about extradimensional alien monsters having mutant children with humans, they were about invasions from distant monsters, they were about the purity of quaint European towns being tainted. Consider how this may have all been inflicted by the fact that he just simply despised anybody who wasnât white. Consider how is opinions on âmixing the racesâ might fight into this; consider why being unable to maintain the âpurityâ of white Europe was the scariest thing of all to him.
This extends to Rowling too.
I would love to say we can just acknowledge that she is an awful, racist, antisemitic, transphobic person and then say âbut at least her books are good,â because, well, they are, arenât they? I would say so, for sure. But to suggest that one can separate her from them isâŚ. ridiculous.
Consider why an antisemitic woman wrote about a species of goblins who live among us, but who for the most part keep to themselvesand are maybe a little bit oppressed by the institution, but also hold all the cards, all the money, run the banks.
Consider why a racist woman would write about a species of slaves who loved being enslaved, who enjoyed working for no pay, and cleaning up after humans, with the only small caveat of that they didnât want to be beaten. Imagine that only the most radical of their species wanted to be free, and he still spent the rest of his life working for no pay and helping out a little white boy and his friends wherever he could. Consider why the only person in the story who thought they should be free, that they should have rights, was treated as an overzealous joke, who was acting against the wishes of those slaves who really LOVE being enslaved. Consider that Rowling went on to say that she kind of considers that girl to be black, now.
Consider why JK Rowling, an open and proud transphobe, wrote Rita Skeeter as having a large square jaw, thick âmanlyâ hands, and dressing incredibly gaudily with the most obvious fake nails and fake teeth and fake hair and fake everything. Consider why a woman who tweets about how trans women are âfoxes pretending to be hens to get in the hen houseâ might write this Rita Skeeter to then illegally transform her body in order to spy on children.
Harry Potter is full of Rowlingâs bigotry, start to finish. Not even tangentially, like, âoh the goblins are bad, Rita Skeeter is bad, the house elves are bad, but most of itâs good!â because the deeper you dig and the longer you think the more you realise the entire story is based on her prejudices.
Harry Potter pretends to be an aracial story about found family, but if that were true, why are Harryâs distant ancestors important to who he is today even in the seventh book? Why does Harry have to live with his cousin and aunt and uncle? Because magic inherently prefers blood ties. Whilst Rowling was writing a story that seemed to say, âyour heritage is not that important and doesnât make you better than othersâ she was still writing a story about a boy who got all of his money through his bloodline, who was protected by living with his bloodline, no matter how evil, who was uniquely able to stop Voldemort because his bloodline passed down the invisibility cloak for generations and generations. Any step Harry takes he is compared to his perfect parents who were exactly like him â he looks just like his father, but he has his motherâs eyes, you know! â consider WHY a woman who is racist mightâve written a story like this. A story that on its surface, condemns a blood caste, but still in every step it takes, validates the idea that blood is thicker than water, and your geneological origin is what makes you special.
You can enjoy Harry Pottwr, of course you can. There are fantastic parts. I love a small group of teenagers deciding to become anarchies rebels and train to fight against fascism in secret. I love the murder mystery plots, I love how the series tells kids that itâs a good thing to be brave, and a good thing to fight injustice, and a good thing to challenge the government. But I cannot separate it from its author because it is such a product of its author. All of the structures of the world, the way things work in the universe, and drenched in Rowlingâs beliefs, her bigotries. Of course they are: she made them.
Again. This doesnât mean you cannot enjoy it. But I think we are past the day where we can pretend that disavowing a bigoted author is enough, and that that somehow separates the text from its bigotry. I think we are past the day where we can pretend that Harry Potter isnât a deeply, inherently bigoted piece of media. Even the bits we love. I think we are beyond the day where we can truthfully pretend to separate it from her, because she is present through all of it. We MUST recognise its flaws. We MUST admit that she is in every part of it.
EDIT (much later):
been brought to my attention Lovecraft was American and not British (i have no idea why i thought otherwise other than that Innsmouth and Dunwich are both very British sounding town-names) but regardless; my point holds up. sorry for the error.
good time to read this today for no particular reason at all.
tummy hurt :(
tried that. didnt do a whole lot, im afraid