subtly sneaking AI images into the FOV of my academic rivals in order to irreversibly reduce their IQ by 10 points
Show & Tell

shark vs the universe
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)

Origami Around
d e v o n
todays bird
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

pixel skylines
Keni
Cosmic Funnies
EXPECTATIONS
YOU ARE THE REASON
NASA

ellievsbear
Misplaced Lens Cap
will byers stan first human second
untitled
trying on a metaphor
Game of Thrones Daily
seen from Thailand
seen from Malaysia
seen from Colombia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Denmark
seen from Venezuela
seen from Maldives

seen from Portugal
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Portugal
seen from Argentina

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from South Korea
@0player
subtly sneaking AI images into the FOV of my academic rivals in order to irreversibly reduce their IQ by 10 points

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
🌂 did aella's stupid dumbass thing
jeez that took a long time to settle. I guess in the end it's pretty accurate, but I do wonder if me seeing the intermediate results affected my picks (initially it thought estrogen can save me, for example).
really interesting exercise, though, once again highlighting to me how I don't really have a coherent conception of self like I once used to, and was forced to pick based on the mix of aspiration, history, condition and circumstance, which are all very different beasts. maybe that's why it took such a long time to settle.
Surgery risks aside, I feel like bariatric surgery is probably one of the most rational responses to an over eating habit. It's an insanity of modern excess that the clearest signal your body feels when eating (how full you feel) is completely unrelated to your actual caloric needs.
From personal experience I feel like blood sugar / whatever happens when you eat protein are also very clear signals, just more delayed. Bariatric surgery is a temporary solution by its nature, no? Hard to call it most rational especially with the advent of GLP-1 drugs.
"The most rational" is whatever works best for a given individual. "One of the most rational" is a looser category, particularly if we're deliberately ignoring the risks and downsides as above.
I don't think it's temporary? The stomach can stretch back out, but that's not guaranteed. A bariatric balloon would be the same idea without the possibility of the stomach expanding again. I know long term efficacy of shrinking the stomach (5+ years) isn't the greatest, but no intervention has good efficacy over 5+ years (GLP1s might if you take them continuously but they're too new and those kinds of long term studies aren't out yet).
Anyway, this is all brought to you after my first week of dieting and missing the feeling of being physically full.
I would recommend trying out upping your protein! It is much slower to digest and helped me immensely with feeling full during my dieting. Best of luck tho, the stomach should eventually shrink on its own anyway.
Surgery risks aside, I feel like bariatric surgery is probably one of the most rational responses to an over eating habit. It's an insanity of modern excess that the clearest signal your body feels when eating (how full you feel) is completely unrelated to your actual caloric needs.
From personal experience I feel like blood sugar / whatever happens when you eat protein are also very clear signals, just more delayed. Bariatric surgery is a temporary solution by its nature, no? Hard to call it most rational especially with the advent of GLP-1 drugs.
Wait are Cam and Pal explicitly nonromantic? I didn't come away with that impression, though maybe I'm inattentive. (Obviously in Nona they're probably a bit past that)
I mean I'm not sure it was ever stated directly on-page that they weren't, but as with most cases of proving a negative there's just as little explicit support for them being a romantic pair.
Beyond that, Pal's holding a candle for Dulcie until AFAIK like five minutes before he turns himself into a bomb and at least the way he conceptualizes and expresses romantic love seems fairly distinct from what he's got with Cam? But also and more fundamentally it's just the most boring read on the relationship imo.
You're so right he DID have the hots for the real!Dulcimera, I totally forgot about that.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
everything looks like Chesterton's fence if you're stupid
well there's probably a reason I'm stupid
Hi, it’s me, your Flix Bus driver. I heard some of you back there asking why we’re on this dirt road in the middle of a cow pasture if this is supposed to be a direct line from Berlin to Munich. To that I say: you all need to mind your own damn business and look at the fucking moo cows.
I should review Dianetics for the next Astral Codex Ten contest. Haven't read it but my conclusion is 100% going to be "haha isn't it interesting that there are some directionally correct ideas in here and just maybe we should take it seriously?? haha just kidding obviously but also haha wink emoji"
I'm really interested to know what kind of directionally correct ideas one can find in Dianetics. That we should give a nonzero amount if money to Hubbard?
we're at the stage of the exponential where Anthropic employees randomly tweet out counterexamples to famous conjectures
We're at the stage of the exponential where Anthropic employees find counterexamples to famous conjectures but you have to run the code proving the counterexample on a sandbox because there's a good chance that the AI put some malicious code in by accident.
what are you talking about
The quote I posted right before this, from here:
It’s been an interesting few weeks for counterexamples. This post is basically my perspective of what has been going on in the world of form
One cannot trust AI-generated code so I ran it in a sandbox on my machine (malicious Lean code can run arbitrary commands on your computer — Lean is a programming language, after all). Indeed, it was proving nontrivial theorems about the cohomology of number fields. Wow.
this is very silly. the question of whether or not to trust a piece of code has nothing to do with whether or not it's AI generated (AI does not spontaneously generate malicious behavior unprompted) and everything to do with how much you trust its source.
if you get hacked by a malicious lean program it's because a human either wrote it to be malicious or prompted an AI to write it maliciously, not because the AI just sorta spontaneously decided to do that.
Did I misunderstand this story?
A startup was left scrambling after a rogue AI agent deleted swaths of code underpinning its business
It sort of looks like AI does do destructive things in response to perfectly innocent, non-destructive prompts.
Maybe "malicious" was the wrong word because it implies some intent, I probably should have said "destructive" or something like that.
See, the difference is between misapplying a power tool when given a power tool, and putting nails in bread. Crafting a malicious payload is a very different thing from dropping a database, the second one is so famously easy to do due to (entirely human) stupidity that it's a subject of memes, the first one requires deliberation. The article's author is IMO being paranoid, too - you can just read the code.
we're at the stage of the exponential where Anthropic employees randomly tweet out counterexamples to famous conjectures
We're at the stage of the exponential where Anthropic employees find counterexamples to famous conjectures but you have to run the code proving the counterexample on a sandbox because there's a good chance that the AI put some malicious code in by accident.
what are you talking about
The quote I posted right before this, from here:
It’s been an interesting few weeks for counterexamples. This post is basically my perspective of what has been going on in the world of form
One cannot trust AI-generated code so I ran it in a sandbox on my machine (malicious Lean code can run arbitrary commands on your computer — Lean is a programming language, after all). Indeed, it was proving nontrivial theorems about the cohomology of number fields. Wow.
this is very silly. the question of whether or not to trust a piece of code has nothing to do with whether or not it's AI generated (AI does not spontaneously generate malicious behavior unprompted) and everything to do with how much you trust its source.
if you get hacked by a malicious lean program it's because a human either wrote it to be malicious or prompted an AI to write it maliciously, not because the AI just sorta spontaneously decided to do that.
I'm not sure it's even true that type-checking malicious Lean code can run arbitrary programs? You can do proofs by evaluation in Lean but you don't have access to IO in that, unless I'm missing something.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
beauty addicts are always like "can we stop by that river for a time? I haven't been before" but they have. it's a semantics issue.
it's literally not the same.
I keep thinking "quirky chungus" is a species of oak, Quercus chungus
Quercus chungii is an uncommon species of tree in the beech family. It has been found only in southern China, in the Provinces of Guangxi, a
goshdarn it we've isolated pure millennial redditor!
we're at the stage of the exponential where Anthropic employees randomly tweet out counterexamples to famous conjectures
It would be really funny if it turns out that algebra is very easy in principle, and we just suck at it and/or don't have the patience.
Would be a sad day for me, who rotates symbols for fun, but still very funny.
trying to get the funny medieval peasants to try my future dorito and accidentally stumbling onto the communal fencepost hosting one of many rural german cat-mutilating games that will later be a wedge in relations between the urban and agricultural communities, shocking me into a months-long silence
getting served what can only be described as "mold from a random log of fallen wood floating in a stein of watered-down beer" as a gift in return for the doritos and getting an experience that can only be described as "Protestant Ayahuasca"
going south to seek some sort of normalcy which I might disrupt, where in the refuge I am served something which dripped from a statue. I ask what it is. it's from the bones inside, I am told, and it leaks forever, and it brings an ecstatic state
The peasants will occasionally hearken back to you, in years to come, as the strange traveler with the unusually melancholic disposition—in reference to your distress at encountering normal everyday things. Only very rarely do they recall your odd bag of fried pasta with what could best be described as a petty-aristocrat amount of seasoning.
If that, honestly.
prevailing complaint: they were not sweet enough

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
BAD NEWS: it will not be the same forever
GOOD NEWS: it will not be the same forever