Misplaced Lens Cap

ellievsbear


ojovivo
NASA

pixel skylines

Kiana Khansmith
h
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Show & Tell

#extradirty

Discoholic đŞŠ
hello vonnie

romaâ
sheepfilms
noise dept.
Keni
seen from Morocco
seen from China

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Australia

seen from Chile

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Indonesia

seen from France

seen from Australia
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from France
seen from Australia
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@vulturesawake

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
hair by branca moura on luana souza for vogue brasil & ph by gleeson paulino
"[Y]our Harry Potter games are Cybertrucks" is such a good way to put it.
ngl kinda hate that "this has been discussed extensively you're just 21" tweet cos it was directed at a trans woman who was getting dogpiled for saying that the "dangerous man in a dress" horror trope is shitty
she was born in 2005, the right wing culture war against trans people has been going on for half her life, if she independently arrives at a correct take then how is that something worth mocking?? you got flowers sprouting through concrete, water them dumbass
my dipshit six year old: if the earth is round how come we don't fall off??
me: lol we learned that in science class 20 years ago 𤣠prick
infinite strangers online: okay this is an all time dunk
Not to be nitpicky, but I think that reaction was more to "nobody ever talk about this" rather than the content of the discussion. It wasn't that she came to that conclusion but more that she thought she was the only one, when it's been a hot topic in transfeminist discourse since before 2010 and she would have known not to start with that had she done any research. It was less like a six year old asking questions are more like a newbie coworker confidently stating that nobody had ever thought about sorting their papers.
Absolutely no excuse for dogpiling or shitting on her though. I agree that the response was needlessly cruel and the waves of people making it into a meme are pretty much lolcow milking which is reprehensible. This was a situation that called for a polite correction at worst and people are looking for any excuse to hurt a trans woman.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Everyone say thank you black women
THANK YOU BLACK WOMEN
Some sailor moon gifs
happy 4th of july ! :â)
Probably an unpopular opinion but i think teenagers have it worse now than most generations did before then. We had malls. We had parks and libraries. There were spaces for them to be in when home-life was hell.
But now, on top of Covid still spreading, monthly live active shooter drills, being chased out of parks for loitering, malls shutting down because people don't have that kind of money anymore, libraries running out of funding. They're being treated worse than anyone else because they don't have rights.
And when they turn 18, have stunted social skills, no prospects in life, we're creating another generation of failed souls, And doomed by the social narrative that teens should neither be seen nor heard. We owe them more than this. You cannot neglect a seedling crop, only for you to plant them into the ground and expect the largest crop that you've ever seen.
Don't get me wrong, fuck facebook, twitter, and TikTok, but these social platforms are sadly the only places they have left. And even then, we need to think of a better way other than blocking teens from everything. Maybe a teen-only social platform or something? We're failing them at every direction.
I'm teaching summer school English to freshmen and we were doing some relationship building exercises. When we asked them what they like to do to relax after a long day, almost all of them said sleeping or scrolling on their phone. These kids are creative, sweet, hard working, and responsible. Some of them have 9 siblings they have to take care of at home. And at the end of the day, all they have is their bed and their phone. My heart breaks for them.
The thing about American "leftist" comedians is that they aren't actually leftist, they are the Imperial Court Jesters. They stand on a stage, point directly at the blood-soaked gears of the war machine, make a little tee-hee noise, and the crowd erupts. Not because they are critiquing the machine, but because the laughter is a pressure release valve for the people inside it. Take the video of that stand-up asking the defense contractor if she helped Trump bomb those 160 Iranian school girls, and everyone laughing, including the contractor herself. That laughter is ritual absolution. The contractor laughs because she knows she will never face a tribunal. The audience laughs because they get to feel "self-aware" without having to actually stop anything. The joke doesn't condemn the contractor; it humanizes her, turns her into a lovable scamp who just happens to have a job graphing the velocity of shrapnel through children's bodies. By making it a punchline, the comedian sanitizes the atrocity. The blood is scrubbed off the stage. The audience gets to say "wow, we are so edgy for talking about it" while the person who builds the bombs gets to chuckle and order another drink. It is not satire, it is a team-building exercise for the empire.
Then there is the YouTuber talking about Transformers, casually dropping the "Iraq war aesthetic" like it's a color palette. Desert punk. Military core. A vibe. This is what happens when your country hasn't had a war on its own soil in living memory; the violence becomes media, a backdrop for childhood toys. The explosions are no longer the sound of mothers screaming; they are cool action sequences. They are digesting the visual debris of massacre as a nostalgic fashion choice, scraping the trauma off and compressing it into a genre for their retro-futurist fantasies. The apocalypse becomes a mood board.
And finally, the girl recounting celebrity love triangles from her childhood, flippantly mentioning how the U.S. was "busy with the Iraq war or whatever." Or whatever. That single phrase is the thesis statement of American innocence. Over a million dead, a region destabilized for a century, an endless river of grief; and for her, it was the commercial break between pop culture segments. It didn't raise her rent. It didn't stop her Wi-Fi. The violence is geo-locked to brown skin and distant deserts, just background noise like a refrigerator humming. She has the luxury of forgetting because the machine doesn't eat her children, it eats yours.
Americans don't hate the machine; they love the output. They hate the mess of it. So they turn it into jokes, into aesthetic, into "whatever." Because if they stopped laughing, if they stopped scrolling, if they actually looked at the 4K drone footage of the aftermath instead of the cool explosion CGI in their movies, they would have to realize that the lithium in their phones, the gas in their tanks, and the comfort of their suburban cul-de-sacs are all greased with the fat of foreign children. And they can't handle that. So they laugh. They turn it into a vibe. They call it "the Iraq war or whatever." You can't deconstruct the master's house with the master's jokes, especially when the punchline is the corpses holding up the floorboards.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
"Theyfab is a slur against trans men!"
And nonbinary people, right?
...
...
...and nonbinary people, right?!?
i donât think iâm exaggerating when i say that the average height for women in the US would increase by at least an inch if teen girls were allowed to eat as much as teen boys are
and not to bring my own clocky bitch ass into this but if cis women werenât so consistently starved their entire lives youâd see a lot more cis women with the kind of bodies that we currently associate closely with trans women. the amount that the standards of feminine presentation are culturally defined by malnutrition is crazy
so I wrote a banger of a paper last semester, like the prof gave me an A+ & told me I oughta use it when applying to grad school level BANGER of a fabulous paper, about Paris is Burning. And in the research for that paper (extensive, all scholarly and peer reviewed sources), I came across an interesting tidbit:
Livingston purposefully kept drag kings, butches, and trans menâs involvement in the scene to a minimum level, so as to not confuse the primary audience (the cishet white middle class American audience).
Now, I do understand why. This movie was made in the late 80s, released in 1990, it makes sense to keep a documentary film focused. But all the same, every time I think about the current trans discourse, I think about the decision to avoid interviewing a huge portion of the community so as to keep the emotional/rhetorical focus sharp. And again, I do have an appreciation for the movie â the paper focused on transfeminine case subjects and how they were empowered by an accepting community. But I cannot deny that it kinda stings to see that âtrans men need to stay quiet so that the rest of the community can thriveâ is not a new take.
Maybe I oughta write a paper on that...
Also, I have done a LOT of research on historical transmasc subjects, and the whole âhysterically demanding to be taken seriously while being a danger to themselves and othersâ is nothing new. TRFs sound like old timey doctors trying to keep transmasculine people quiet & obedient.
Transmasc invisibility is and always has been enforced. It doesn't arise naturally, people commit to shit like this.
That sounds so familiar to what the transgender people were told when civil rights marches for gay people started--that we ALL needed to stay quiet so the movement could seem "focussed" and "easy to understand" for the straights. Same shit different day.
I didn't know I was trans until 2007, because I didn't know that a trans person could be THAT direction of trans. And even then, I wasn't really given any information about anything but binary transness. There's still very little information about it for people my age (another issue the queer community has). And yet in the almost twenty years I've been here, the needle hasn't moved at all for trans-m people. My Dr, who works at the queer clinic, was telling me how frustrated she was that she'd read this big huge book that was supposedly the history of trans treatment and transmen were not meantioned even at all, even though it mentioned doctors that worked with us, like Hirschfeld! And I was like yeah! We're invisible! We get called lesbians and tomboys and "wow she was so brave having to cross-dress and pretend she was a man to live her life #girlboss" even when its like "this person shot anybody that called him a girl, went by male appellations and a male name, and said he was a man".
We're here.
Y'all just don't fucking LISTEN.
I wonder why THAT is?
(I know why.)
So does anyone have an actual source for this? Genuinely, I would love to be able to verify this, but anon doesn't really give any identifying information about what source this actually came from & I haven't been able to find anything myself.
My first thought is the Criterion Collection commentary, discussion, or outtakes, but those are behind a paywall & I haven't found any way to access them.
Tumblr is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, and bond over the stuff you love. It's where your interests connect you with your
@genderkoolaid sorry this is the only way it would let me upload it but I was able to snag a free trial of Criterion and went to listen to the commentary to confirm it. I took an audio recording of the commentary dialogue starting at 12:40 ish where the director talks about cutting out âbutches and masculine lesbiansâ for being too confusing and off topic.
so I wrote a banger of a paper last semester, like the prof gave me an A+ & told me I oughta use it when applying to grad school level BANGER of a fabulous paper, about Paris is Burning. And in the research for that paper (extensive, all scholarly and peer reviewed sources), I came across an interesting tidbit:
Livingston purposefully kept drag kings, butches, and trans menâs involvement in the scene to a minimum level, so as to not confuse the primary audience (the cishet white middle class American audience).
Now, I do understand why. This movie was made in the late 80s, released in 1990, it makes sense to keep a documentary film focused. But all the same, every time I think about the current trans discourse, I think about the decision to avoid interviewing a huge portion of the community so as to keep the emotional/rhetorical focus sharp. And again, I do have an appreciation for the movie â the paper focused on transfeminine case subjects and how they were empowered by an accepting community. But I cannot deny that it kinda stings to see that âtrans men need to stay quiet so that the rest of the community can thriveâ is not a new take.
Maybe I oughta write a paper on that...
Also, I have done a LOT of research on historical transmasc subjects, and the whole âhysterically demanding to be taken seriously while being a danger to themselves and othersâ is nothing new. TRFs sound like old timey doctors trying to keep transmasculine people quiet & obedient.
Transmasc invisibility is and always has been enforced. It doesn't arise naturally, people commit to shit like this.
That sounds so familiar to what the transgender people were told when civil rights marches for gay people started--that we ALL needed to stay quiet so the movement could seem "focussed" and "easy to understand" for the straights. Same shit different day.
I didn't know I was trans until 2007, because I didn't know that a trans person could be THAT direction of trans. And even then, I wasn't really given any information about anything but binary transness. There's still very little information about it for people my age (another issue the queer community has). And yet in the almost twenty years I've been here, the needle hasn't moved at all for trans-m people. My Dr, who works at the queer clinic, was telling me how frustrated she was that she'd read this big huge book that was supposedly the history of trans treatment and transmen were not meantioned even at all, even though it mentioned doctors that worked with us, like Hirschfeld! And I was like yeah! We're invisible! We get called lesbians and tomboys and "wow she was so brave having to cross-dress and pretend she was a man to live her life #girlboss" even when its like "this person shot anybody that called him a girl, went by male appellations and a male name, and said he was a man".
We're here.
Y'all just don't fucking LISTEN.
I wonder why THAT is?
(I know why.)
So does anyone have an actual source for this? Genuinely, I would love to be able to verify this, but anon doesn't really give any identifying information about what source this actually came from & I haven't been able to find anything myself.
My first thought is the Criterion Collection commentary, discussion, or outtakes, but those are behind a paywall & I haven't found any way to access them.
Tumblr is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, and bond over the stuff you love. It's where your interests connect you with your
@genderkoolaid sorry this is the only way it would let me upload it but I was able to snag a free trial of Criterion and went to listen to the commentary to confirm it. I took an audio recording of the commentary dialogue starting at 12:40 ish where the director talks about cutting out âbutches and masculine lesbiansâ for being too confusing and off topic.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Not shaving and not wearing make up are literally nonbehaviors. Theyâre a complete lack of action. But doing nothing is considered masculine because women are not allowed to just be. this goes double for trans women.
reblog this version because transmisogynists donât know how to fuck off.
we SHOULD have more shipping content with arospec and acespec characters actually because almost none of the shit we have now is actually that, its writing them as allo and then saying "whaaaat nooooo they can be in relationships tooooo" why dont you try writing the aro character in a romantic partnership as actually being aromantic but partnering that is way more fucking interesting
Exactly
Like every gooner hears they can't fuck something and they force it. It's creepy and disrespectful.
gooner is not a healthy or useful word. it demonizes masturbation which is a normal human activity for people who choose to do it. You are not affiliated with me.
Im not trying to shame masturbating. Almost everyone does it. I'm referring to what people actually mean which is the harmful side of people who take it too far/ sexualize people who wouldn't actually consent.
Your taking my words and mixing it to what I was not saying.
This is TMI, but I actually suffer from hypersexuality so I completely understand how this stuff happens and I know who I'm talking about when I say gooner. Im just not going to pull out a medical chart to explain myself and others because that feels actually destructive.
it is also destructive to use words that have been co-opted by the online right and contaminated everday language to shame sexuality un a critical and insulting sense. imo.
@balans-wife it's not about just "not fucking" people, the post specifically also included aro people who for some like me, do want to fuck people. Just without having to be in a relationship that feels gross and invasive -- we can be partenered without the relationship being romantic. Lots of nuance went over your head.
And gooner 100% does not mean what you're trying to convey, so, if you don't want people to "mix up" your meaning maybe use the right words.
Dude/dudette, this specifically about aro and ace that don't desire that stuff. Also I'm asking what's a better word and you all are avoiding an answer.
its not specifically about that, actually, read the fucking post, where I don't mention sex or sex aversion at all, and I talk more specifically about aromantic people. really this post is about people like you who are incapable of understanding or helpfully interacting with posts like this and instead need to spew some bullshit.
I'm blocked I think but in case you share similar sentiments the alternative to saying "gooner" is to fix your attitude around sex and sexuality