I wish i could find this one article written in I believe the 90βs that went under the radar on abortion. The author said that the βlifeβ arguments are basically useless on either side and what actually matters is that humans shouldnβt have a right to use other human bodies as a resource without consent no matter how alive or sentient they are, even if theyβre on the brink of death you have the right to deny them access to you. It probably was too radical for pro-choice activists back in those days but likeβ¦thatβs the most robust arguement lol so we need 2 being that back and dead the pontifications and splitting hairs about βlifeβ in my honest onion
I found it. Actually, it was written in the 70βs. She was way ahead of the curve.
The article is βA Defense of Abortionβ by Judith Jarvis Thomson. Essential reading!
http://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/Phil160,Fall02/thomson.htm
If you cannot demand that a person donate their organs to keep you alive, you have no right to legislate that an embryo gets to use a womanβs body to keep itself alive without the womanβs consent.






























