King: Excellent. What are they like?

Servant: One of them is a dragon-lady.

King: Interesting. Those are rare around these parts.

Servant: Another is a goblin paladin.

King: Not a role you usually see goblins in.

Servant: A third is a purple-skinned tiefling.

King: I didn't even know they come in that color.

Servant: The last one is a sapient gelatinous cube.

King: What. How did these four even meet?

There is very little intrinsic institutional power in queenship. The power a consort, dowager, or queen mother has depends mostly on how much the reigning sovereign (usually a man) is willing to grant her. Needing a queen to serve as regent is exceptionally rare, and the regent is more often a male relative.

Queen regnant: woman who rules in her own right, not on behalf of someone else.

Regent: Someone who temporarily assumes the powers of the monarch on account of the monarch being too young or too incapacitated to govern.

Queen consort: Woman who is married to the monarch.

Dowager queen: Woman who was married to the monarch. The monarch is dead, and she is owed support as his widow.

Queen regnant: Elizabeth II. She was the eldest child of King George VI, and her only other sibling was her sister (the British throne used male-preference primogeniture for the line of succession until 2015, so any younger male siblings would have inherited it before her), so the throne passed to her on her father's death.

Regent: Richard III. Younger brother to Edward IV and uncle to Edward's sons, Edward V and Richard of Shrewsbury (apparently they liked a naming tradition at that point), who were 12 and 9 respectively when their father died. Strictly speaking, this meant they were first and second in line for the throne when their father died, with Richard III being third in line, but because Edward V wasn't old enough to rule by himself, his uncle became regent. He took them to the Tower of London for safety and then something mysterious happened to them both and he begrudgingly accepted the throne (he very clearly murdered them).

Queen consort: Queen Camilla, wife of King Charles III (the current king) and therefore queen consort.

Dowager queen: Possibly Queen Camilla in future. As second wife of Charles III and not mother to either of his sons (William and Harry both being sons of Charles III and Princess Diana), then if Charles predeceased Camilla, she would become solely a dowager queen, not also queen mother. (Side note: I couldn't think of any historical dowager queens who weren't also queen mothers off the top of my head, so after a bit of Wiki'ing I can tell you the last one for the British throne was Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen, wife of King William IV and aunt of Queen Victoria; when William IV died without any children to inherit, the throne passed to his brother's daughter, Victoria.)

no more gendered dress codes. no more gender markers on passports, driver's licenses, ids. i'm not talking about "adding x" or "adding a third category" i'm talking about no more categories, period. why does the government need to know what my genital situation is? why does the government feel the need to assign me a sex on the basis of genitals? why does the cop who pulled me over need to see an m, or an f, or an x?

no more "gender is a social construct, sex is the thing that's binary." sex is not binary. abolish the idea that it is. normalize conversations about intersex traits. being intersex is natural. the sex binary is a thing imposed by the state.

no more gendered sports. if you really care about equity, sort people into categories based on skill level and athleticism, not gender or sex. the concept that there are only two sexes and that one is inherently weaker than the other is pseudoscience. the male/female hunter/gatherer dichotomy is not based in fact, and is a product of modern sexist cultural biases. one gender is not inherently subservient to the other. people are not inherently different on the basis of sex or gender. it is just more complicated than that.

the concept of multiple genders and sexes beyond the man/woman male/female dichotomy has existed as long as humans have existed. the sex binary only serves to benefit the patriarchy. the gender binary only serves to benefit the patriarchy. continuing to impose it just controls (and harms) the people it forcibly categorizes.

So a few days ago I noticed a fox friend running through my yard. I was able to snap this photo.

I called him Milo.

I thought he was a lone wolf who chose my neighborhood as his domain.

But Milo is not alone.

Milo is a papa.

He and his lady fox have three little foxes!

I went from never having seen a fox to FIVE foxes playing in my backyard.

The three kiddos were wrestling. Their opening move is to do this cat-like superjump and then dive bomb into their sibling. Then they roll around. And then a high speed chase ensues.

One of the little foxes came near the house and I got a few closer photos.

I love the little black socks.

Papa Milo and Mama Mia.

And for the kits... Marian, McCloud, and Michael J.

i love my fans 💚

-hallucinate

-cry over what seems to be small things

-become furiously angry over what seems to be small things

-hit a self destruct button over and over again

-lose all sense of reality

-becoming straight up unable to communicate

-view every situation as life or death

-experience delusions/become vulnerable to irrational worldviews

-perceive hostility where none exists

-become extremely nauseous and/or throw up

-stop engaging in sleeping/eating/basic hygiene

-stop processing sensory input

-process way too much sensory input all at once

-lash out at others/themselves

-and more!