Not âOnly my reading of canon is correctâ or âInterpretations are subjective and all validâ but a secret third thing, âMore than one interpretation can be valid but thereâs a reason your English teacher had you cite quotes and examples in your papers, you have to have a strong argument that your interpretation is actually supported by the text or it is just wrong and Iâm fine with telling you itâs wrong, actually.â
If the text says the curtains are blue you can argue about what that means; but if youâre going to claim theyâre actually yellow youâd better have a really good argument.
i know the curtains better than the author. thank you for coming to my ted talk
Fandom has such unresolved mommy/daddy issues about authors. If you apply a little reading comprehension skills to my original post youâll see I didnât say anything at all about the author. You guys always make âinterpretationâ about your beef with the author. Youâre all obsessed with the author. This post is just about deciphering what is there in canon. Figuring out what is being communicated by the canon itself with all the words and images and basic formal elements that are there in canon. Thatâs all itâs about. It really doesnât matter if the author intentionally put all those things there in a pattern that might support the idea that this one characterâs queer. Thatâs not what this is about. What matters is if you can compellingly argue thereâs a pattern of evidence there. Or not. Everyone is conspiring together to make me go insane still adding shit about authorial intent on my post.
Okay, claiming blue curtains are yellow...
I now have this utter vision in my head and I wish it existed. Basically, a close-third or first-person pov with a character who has undiagnosed tritanopia who always describes the curtains as a light blue/etc.
Also, apparently, tritanopia is something you can develop over a lifetime.
So, the first time the character sees the curtains in, let's say, his childhood home, he notes the yellow curtains of his memory have been replaced with light blue ones. And this is taken as a sign of how nothing, even one's past and home, remain the same. Everything is lost.
But! Have the story very subtly hint at the possibility that the curtains are, in fact, still yellow. Let it be subtle enough that the general consensus is that the curtains are blue, but just enough hints that someone can argue that the character has blue-yellow color blindness and the curtains are actually still yellow and how this shows that it isn't that everything changes, but that our perspective does. Or something similar.
Is the character actually color-blind? Who knows! Doesn't matter. The possibility and the argument are what make the analysis fun.
...this has nothing to do with the original post, but I was struck by the idea and had zero desire to summarize context when I could just reblog...
(I have said 'hint' and claimed the protag is color-blind, but that's because I'm thinking from the pov of how to make this a thing. More, I wish there was a book that had a small, but passionate group of readers who could argue ardently that the curtains were yellow using clues from the book itself).
























