So much global culture and history has been lost and destroyed because of Christianity, from the witch hunts of the 10th and 11th centuries, the crusades, even if you want to go that far back, the destruction of the roman empire to create the "holy" roman empire.
I am ethnically Jewish, but a Witch in practice and both of those have been taken apart and reconstructed to fit a Christian narrative.
Laws and medical rulings are made based on what is acceptable by this parasitic faith culture, and people are just okay with that.
If marginalized cutlures behaved this way, we would be eliminated; well; eliminated faster than they are trying to kill us.
So if you're wondering why i run this blog and am so against Christianity and Catholicism. That is why.
My roots both culturally and genetically have been erased and cut away to fit a narrative we were never part of.
The genocide of native peoples has Christian origin.
A majority of the Nazi party and supporters were devout Catholics.
The colonization of africa and basically the rest of the world was done to spread Christianity in some form or another.
So if you are still okay practicing that faith, you are just as evil as the people that came before you.
You deserve what is coming, and worse
You need to feel threatened
You need to feel fear
What you have killed has refused to stay dead. And debts of death and destruction always get repaid in blood.
It will be yours
I'm sorry, can you clarify this?
Am I supposed to feel threatened or am I the terrifying crusader who eliminates marginalized cultures even faster than under some other circumstances?
I read this and I think Christianity won so thoroughly that OP is talking with a thin layer of witchy aesthetics over a foundation of Christian culture.
Listen to yourself, "What you have killed has refused to stay dead", that sounds familiar. OP can't even get things creatively wrong - it's just parasitic inversions of Christianity. Christianity killed the witchcraft tradition so hard it's not only dead, OP can't even find the body.
The empirical claims are wrong too.
The genocide of native peoples has Christian origin.
No. The first example that comes to my mind is King Ashurbanipal of Assyria, 7th Century BC, who boasted extensively of how he slaughtered the people of Elam. He heaped up a pile of corpses, burnt captives to death, dyed the ground red with blood, razed Elam's shrines and killed their gods too, generally killed everyone and destroyed everything Elam had, left no survivors to perform funerary rites for the ghosts, and then to drive the point home he carried off their bones so that even the ghosts would suffer. And he salted the earth.
Maybe Ashurbanipal was exaggerating his deeds somewhat, but the concept was evidently familiar to him, so it must have originated further back.
OP's post is immensely deranged and honestly I could just write tons of paragraphs about it that no one will ever read, but I think it's pretty evident how much of a dumbass they are.
But there are a few things that just left me laughing. Like... does this person seriously think that the Holy Roman Empire (founded 800 AD with the crowning of Charlemagne) directly destroyed the Roman Empire (its fall usually seen as occurring in 476 AD)? The level of historical ignorance at play is both hilarious and sad.
