The really telling thing about how whenever I point out that "roleplaying focused" or "RP forward" are meaningless marketing terms in tabletop RPGs and a bunch of folks rock up in the notes to explain how it's actually obvious what they mean isn't how ill-considered and incomplete the definitions of "roleplaying" that get trotted out invariably are, but how many of them are flatly mutually exclusive of one another. Like, you're kinda proving my point there â "RP forward" can't exactly be a meaningful descriptor of a game when nobody in its ostensible target audience can even agree on what "roleplaying" is, let alone what mechanically emphasising it would entail!























