quarterly reminder that if i reblog something ai-generated it is 110% and always an accident and for the love of god please tell me so i can delete it from my blog
sheepfilms
Keni
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Fai_Ryy
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Misplaced Lens Cap
official daine visual archive

Origami Around
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Show & Tell

PR's Tumblrdome
noise dept.

Monterey Bay Aquarium
will byers stan first human second
Xuebing Du
art blog(derogatory)

oozey mess
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from Spain
seen from Venezuela

seen from Australia

seen from Germany

seen from Philippines
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from United States

seen from Japan
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from South Africa
seen from Chile
seen from Greece
@queercripintersex
quarterly reminder that if i reblog something ai-generated it is 110% and always an accident and for the love of god please tell me so i can delete it from my blog

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Tbh I think the "but data centers are important infrastructure, not just AI" talking point misses that like
Ok so roads are important infrastructure. A lot of stuff that's important happens on roads. Now, let's imagine that quadrillionaire Matt Stench has decided that the next big tech innovation is the Wide Car. It's a car that takes up six lanes despite seating only one passenger.
The Wide Car is supposed to be the future, and everyone's going to be driving Wide Cars, even though nobody who makes Wide Cars is turning a profit. Employers are offering Wide Cars as an employee benefit, and getting "nah." Some employers are going as far as demanding their employees drive Wide Cars, and the result is that people take time out of their workdays to get in the mandatory gas usage for their Wide Car before driving home in a regular car.
In spite of the fact that the Wide Car is clearly set to fail, there's an enormous push to expand to twelve-lane roads to accommodate a bunch of Wide Cars that simply will not materialize. This is not an organic response to demand, but a speculative investment that amplifies the existing issues with road development for no good reason.
That is the problem.
Oh and the road infrastructure project is buying up resources other people could have used for literally anything else. With money they promise they'll be making from Wide Car sales any day now.
Okay so what I'm getting from the notes is that when you try to transplant some techbro nonsense into an offline equivalent, you have to be careful to avoid simply inventing something the Americans are already doing in real life
i've stood next to one, 5'3", its sheer presence genuinely fucking intimidates me. that thing should not be on the road.
This is also a problem in the US because
These cars don't fit into parking spaces and make pulling out in parking lots impossible
The weight of big cars is causing additional stress on roads and bridges
The number of big cars and trucks is directly linked to the number of children struck by cars because the drivers can't see over the hood!
These cars should be banned. They're not even useful for hauling because the truck bed space keeps shrinking.
...please don't be telling me there are Even Wider Cars that we aren't seeing in Europe? Because the humongousness of some of the cars people are trying and failing to cram into our parking garages here in Sweden already causes disasters, frankly.
Doomy, I am so sorry to tell you this, but Ford put this thing on the market last year.
And this is its even worse sibling from this year.
...well shit.
Let's all remember to include nonbinary and intersex people when we talk about trans issues and trans discourse! The trans world is not all trans men and trans women, or even transmascs and transfems! Correct people's assumptions and language before we backslide into upholding the sex and gender binary and gender essentialism!!!
scariest thing is when you're a kid in a huge family run by women and then you go over to a house that's deeply patriarchal & misogynistic. i remember when i was 8 years old and i got invited over to my friend's house for a big birthday party with her entire extended family. after the enormous lunch that served over 30 people, i got called into the kitchen to do literally hundreds of dishes, alongside all the other little girls and women. not only were the boys our age all excused from the meal to go play, but all the grown men went to the living room to watch sports together and drink. i couldn't believe it. i asked why some of the grownups were watching TV but the girls had to clean up and all the women just laughed and laughed at me.
as a teenager when i learned the word "sexist" and used it the older women balked at it and tried to convince me this arrangement was a good thing actually because women need space from men, and cleaning in the kitchen after parties is a sacred domain of safety. and i was like actually i think needing private safety from your own husbands, sons, and brothers sounds even worse. like do you understand you somehow made this even more troubling than it already was
like i think it's fine if a bunch of sister-in-laws/wives want time together without their husbands & brothers to talk together in camaraderie. i'm not judging that. obviously. but dare i ask why the women's meetup could only take place while doing manual labor for a nearby room full of men
it's also interesting how this ingrained rigid social structures in children bc i was mostly friends with boys at that age and in fact was at the birthday party of a friend who was a boy so i remember complaining to him at school that it was weird all the girls had to help clean up because i didn't know any of the other little girls so i felt really left out that i didn't get to hang out with my own friends for a chunk of the party and he and the other little boys were like "that's just the rules."
yeah growing up in the Appalachian bible belt I absolutely often saw this re-enforced by women.
Hey so as the economy continues to get worse in the next few years, gambling companies are going to go extra hardcore predatory as people become more desperate. Yes, even more than they already are. You have to promise me right now you're not going to fall for it. No gambling, okay?
This is going to be especially bad with prediction markets and sports gambling, and it's already really fucking bad. But it also goes for loot boxes, blind box collectables, trading card games, and ESPECIALLY gacha games.
We are seeing this right now with Kalshi's sudden push towards people watching reality dating shows like love island, as they are starting to tap out on their first big market block - young straight men into sports/politics. They are moving on towards young straight women now with the dating shows thing but they will start diversifying into other niches soon!
Do not start gambling. A friend of mine used to work for a bank's anti-money-laundering dept and they'd review flagged accounts for suspicious withdrawals, frequent charges, etc, and sometimes it was fraud but other times it was just severe gambling addicts absolutely hemorrhaging money. It is not worth it!!!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
No, no, and NO.
AO3 does not live in “the cloud” because that is other people’s computers, and other people’s computers are vulnerable to censorship.
AO3 is on its own computers. It does still have to be housed somewhere, and I suppose a determined enough hater could try to find that place and go after it, but it’s a lot harder than sending spurious complaints to Amazon or whomever going “BadWrong things are hosted on your cloud service!”
Owning the servers is a core tenet of OTW/AO3.
Warming up a new database server….
When people involved with AO3 talk about “the cost of servers” they don’t mean “the cost to pay Amazon for space on their servers.” They mean, like, the cost to physically own them, and eventually replace them with new ones. And the operating costs to run them.
AO3 is not “in the cloud.” AO3 is stored on physical machines that the OTW owns.
While this is not a solution that can work for everyone who wants to deal with controversial content, it is why AO3ple sneer at alt-righters who complain about getting thrown off hosting platforms.
I Want Us to Own the Goddamned Servers
Because I want us to own the goddamned servers, ok? Because I want a place where we can’t be TOSed and where no one can turn the lights off or try to dictate to us what kind of stories we can tell each other.
AO3 is what a website looks like when you seize the means of production.
Exactly. When I was growing up, pre-internet, they used to say, “Freedom of the press is for those that own one.”
The early internet was like everyone owned a press. Those days are gone; owning the servers is the new owning the press.
TBH, I kind of want to get a printing press.
Here's an idea about why kids are so anxious and depressed all the time...the environments kids are in most of the time are very stressful and don't fulfill their needs for play, rest, proper variety of foods, positive social opportunities, and freedom from fear pain punishment etc
Like everyone with any basic understanding of animal welfare knows that if you put an animal in an enclosure that is too crowded, without hiding spots, with no freedom to move around, no ability to avoid harsh and stressful stimuli, and scare it by shouting at it and punishing it, the animal will become stressed and start chewing its own fur off or hurting itself or become sick or unable to eat...
But we expect human children to grow up in these conditions and literally blame them when they develop the exact type of problems that any creature under those conditions would
Babies don't misbehave, they just behave. There's no such thing as a baby being "bad" because they don't understand cause and effect at first and have no concept of others feelings for a while after they do learn that.
A baby is never doing something to upset you. They don't act up to piss you off. They act in the only way they know how, and yes, sometimes the behaviour they're drawn to isn't great! That's why you guide them and comfort.
It's okay to be mad, but you need to remind yourself of this or you'll become resentful. Babies don't misbehave.
That’s why you should never accept the excuse “Well it was a different time.” They knew it was wrong. They always knew.
In fact slavery was one of the biggest debates among the founding fathers, to the point that even some of the slave holders kinda realized they were being hipocrites.
Rather famously George Washington was pretty conflicted about the whole thing (not enough to free his slaves immediately because he was still a bit of a hypocrite) but did put in his will for the slaves to be freed once his wife died… Which Martha realizing that put a massive target on her back and led to her immediately freed the slaves after he died. (Unfortunately he couldn’t free the slaves legally belonging to his widows family because of course not, which was about half of them).
Seriously, people knew this shit was wrong, it wasn’t hard. Though it is rather ironic that Jefferson was among the worst when it came to slave treatment (there was so much fucking rape)
The basics of the civil war were set into stone from square one.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Sugar cravings aren't usually addiction. Discover how restriction and the binge-restrict cycle may be driving your eating patterns.
Feel like some people may need to read this. Basically when you under eat you crave sugar a lot more because it's an easy source of energy for your body
Some people saying "uhh shouldn't this be obvious" but there is genuinely such a push right now to paint normal human body functions as outdated nonsense that should be ignored for better health. Like cravings for sugar and carbs will always have a reason for existing, it's not some sort of evil trick to sabotage your diet, just probably means you're lacking something
Literally been saying this for years AND I am SO fucking glad there are studies and shit now so I can actually show people the truth without them going "oh I'm glad you don't get sugar cravings but for me if I buy any candy I just eat it all immediately so I have to avoid it completely" or "yeah I can't let myself have sugar so I just vape with sugar cookie juice bcs it's healthier" like that's normal and not a major sign that your relationship with food is beyond fucked and needs serious attention before you kill yourself.
No one ever believes me that I don't really get sugar cravings or binge candy because I never ever make candy into a special thing I can only have sometimes. If I want sugar I eat sugar and I honestly fail to finish candy off more often than I eat all of it, and the days when I do I was clearly extremely stressed and I immediately feel better and, crucially, STOP CRAVING SUGAR.
This is the opening of the aricle: "Have you ever felt a loss of control while eating sweets? Does it feel hard to stop eating? Do you feel ashamed of how much you’re eating? Has this caused you to wonder if you’re addicted to sugar?"
And I have never once restricted sugar, and I promise all of you, I HAVE NEVER IN MY LIFE FELT LIKE THIS. I grew up food insecure, have several mental illnesses that make me prone to addiction, and my parents were addicts which means I'm genetically predisposed to addiction AND EVEN THEN I have never had trouble controlling myself around sweets EVER even when I was a kid!! The only food I get like this about legit is fresh fruit bcs I was too poor to afford it regularly as a kid, and gee, I wonder why being denied this type of food made me fixate on it like crazy, maybe there's something to think about there, yeah??????? The ONLY time I have ever felt even a little like this was when doctors were trying to get me to lose weight and the second I stopped restricting the cravings went away. And again, the cravings I do have are when I'm stressed, about to have a migraine, or when my doctors were trying to give me an eating disorder, and they go away when I let myself eat some gummy worms or make brownies. Every time. Every single time.
Constantly craving sugar is a sign something is wrong with your body. It's not normal to feel that way 24/7. You should be able to have candy in your house without stressing about it or eating all of it in a day. You're not a bad person or a failure, your relationship with food is broken and it can be fixed so you don't have to live like this. You should not have to live like this.
Being skinny or "healthy" cannot be worth living like this.
Coming out as trans young but not transitioning medically bc of restrictions really fucks you up because you just sit and stare in the mirror going “if rules were different I wouldn’t look like this right now” and then you get really fucked up
I got most of the way through almost getting on T at 14 until my insurance changed what they covered and so I had to wait 6 years
It really fucking does, at 16 I got all the way to the last step but then my dad refused to sign the consent form and i had to wait another 2 fucking years to start. I don't know if i could ever really forgive him
God having it be your own parent holding you back instead of just bullshit rules or insurance. :(
The fact a kid can express their wants and identity and still be denied it because kids are still seen as property of parents is so fucked up.
So many political posts I hate boil down to "I don't want to organize and work with people I hate and fight for small, incremental victories, I just want to start a revolution where everyone magically becomes an automaton who acts exactly the way I think they should act"
Like damn man, I want that too. Unfortunately I live in reality though so we're stuck with the first thing.
"Modern movements are too fractured, too aimless, with too much infighting and corruption among the leadership. What we need is a revolution, which famously never have any issues with those things" okay then. Good luck I guess
This whole line of thinking comes down to "the current systems and leadership are bad. What we need is a fresh start with only people who are good, and then all the systems will be good". Which is simply not how anything has ever worked!
"We don't have enough people, funding, and power to bring about changes through elections! We have to do an armed revolution instead which thankfully doesn't require people, funding, or power to pull off."
Unfortunately tedious coalition building with annoying people will always be necessary.
hey. dont cry. 566 california condors, okay? 369 free flying.[1] it's gonna be okay.
for the record, in 1987 there were 27. [2] things can get better.
HEY. DONT CRY. 607 CALIFORNIA CONDORS, OKAY? 392 FREE FLYING. [3]
legend tells of a mysterious being called “nuance” that allows multiple things to be true at the same time. some say you can still hear its voice whispering in the trees

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"my life isn't a crime, I'm not one of those people -"
"you sure? new parameters for Those People just dropped. check again."
And if you truly cannot imagine this, if you're convinced that it will never happen to you, consider this one thing.
Would you want scammers to know the state of your loved one's dementia?
Oh. Shit.
XtY terms to me are like "i am transitioning from seeing myself one way to seeing myself another" rather than like. implying that someone is defined by what they were assigned at birth.
so to me the whole "AGAB identity" thing just feels weird and off. AGAB is about an event. gender imposition is a process that is ongoing throughout life, and intersex people are a good example of that process... unfortunately.
for example we have a term, RGAB, meaning reassigned gender after birth. i was reassigned female hormonally as a teenager while they knew I didnt identify as one - implying I did not then fit binary female assignment, not just with identity, but with the help of my intersex variation.
basically, AGAB is the first act of imposing gender. that's all. your identity as a trans person is impacted by that, but it is not defined by it. we chose our identities in spite of our assignments or imposed genders. and no, i dont mean the feelings behind that identity is a choice.
i mean that we choose to give voice to who we are, not just who others have forced us to be. that is what identity terms are for. it's not about what gender you were assigned at birth. its about you, as a full living being.
it's called an "id"entity for a reason lol. if you find AGAB relevant to your identity, that's fine. not an issue at all. if you don't, that's okay too.
the beautiful thing about life is that it's normal to be different. everyone is.