If you can't pay your workers a living wage, you shouldn't be allowed to afford to be in business (but you are).
If a profit cannot be made while also ensuring that your workers can live comfortably, locally, on what you pay them, that your supplies are ethically sourced, and that you do not externalize any costs (such as environmental damage that others are forced to deal with the effects of), then you do not deserve to make a profit.
If a profit cannot be made under the restrictions above, and the product or service is a necessity, then it should be a publicly managed free-at-the-point-of-access product or service. If a profit cannot be made and the product is not a necessity, is it worth underpaying people and destroying the planet and manipulating legislation and wage theft and...?
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Maximizing Profits: Working with Wholesale Onesie Suppliers in the UK
In recent years, the baby clothing market has seen a significant uptick, with onesies becoming a staple in every child’s wardrobe. Retailers looking to capitalize on this trend can maximize their profits by strategically partnering with wholesale onesie suppliers in the UK. This article discusses the benefits of working with these suppliers, the factors to consider when selecting a supplier, and…
When Healthcare Became a Business: Why America Can't Find Enough Doctors? --- Part 1 of 2 Parts by Metis with some assistance from Dr. Persico
No matter where you live in American today, you will encounter the problem that there is a physician shortage. It is easy to blame people. We can ask why more people are not interested in becoming doctors. The truth is that America does not suffer from a shortage of people who want to become doctors. It suffers from a healthcare system that systematically limits physician supply, burns out…
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Instead of a wealth tax or an income tax, what if a politician ran on a wage ratio maximum of 100 to 1? Maybe call it a century law: no year of yours is worth a century of ours.
A wage ratio maximum of 100 to 1 would mean that any employer may pay their highest-paid employee up to just below 100 times what they pay their lowest-paid employee.
So if, one year, a company wants to pay their CEO a total of $20 million in salary and bonuses and whatnot, then they must also pay their lowest-paid employee at least $200k plus a cent for that same year.
And when any employer violates this law, the fine shall be exactly twice as much money as was misdistributed: half paid to the government and used for job readiness and training programs to combat unemployment; the other half, distributed to all shorted employees as it should have been.
This would incentivize employers to adopt either an hourly wage or salary model across the board—for all employees, from the custodians to the CEOs—to standardize their wages to be more predictable (lower than they expect to earn in profits that year, just to be safe), and then to pay out end-of-year bonuses to distribute any extra annual profits. It would also monetarily incentivize all employees to work toward the profit of the employer, since an increase in profits would always be shared by everyone.
For reference, compared to the century ratio of 100:1 with shared gains (and shared losses) that I propose, here’s how we currently stand:
From 2019 to 2024, average CEO pay at these firms climbed 34.7%, compared with just a 16.3% rise for their average worker pay. Inflation was
CEO-to-worker pay has skyrocketed over the last six decades, growing 1084% compared to a typical workers' pay which only grew 26%. It's exce
A new ITUC-Oxfam report covering 1,500 companies found CEO pay is outpacing worker wages by a factor of 20—and the gap is only getting wider
Executive Paywatch - 2025 | AFL-CIO
I think this policy would be a lot more popular than taxing is, because it allows profits to go right into the pockets of all those who contributed earning it. It would also drastically reduce income inequality among all workers and incentivize the best workers for the job (because high-pay jobs at high-profit organizations will be extremely competitive).
If anyone has any idea why nobody out there is running on this sort of idea as a staple of their platform, tell me. Is this stupid? Or could it work?