#harrassers

ok so a girl sent me a message last night telling me that she thinks “Vader” is back now under this assumed tumblr account name now, and he’s going around HARRASSING WOMAN again in our community!  

Here’s part of her message she sent to me “ He does talk like him and not only that, he doesn’t want to told me his name and he said “call me M” and the name of is Mike (Vader). He stalked me for over a year before!“

The short of this vid is, yes. If you're stuck in a crappy relationship, your body is gonna have a full body reaction to the situation. That compounding for years? Wugh

Cited "water is wet" paper:

They specifically studied being stuck with harrassers. And Dr Ramani connected dots to her own research.

Saturday, April 30, 2022 "COSPLAY ≠ CONSENT Don't be a douche. Don't stand by if you see it happen. Let the harassers know that it's not cool." - Unknown Artist

**Let me know who the artist is in the comments.**

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Over the next two months, Pedro Domingos, a professor emeritus at the University of Washington, and Michael Lissack, a Wall Street whistleblower turned admitted harasser, promoted the narrative that Gebru’s work was “advocacy disguised as science.” They said she’d created a toxic environment at Google and was “obsessed with being a victim.” They wrote off her supporters as sycophants and “deranged activists.”

On Twitter, the campaign gained momentum with the help of anonymous accounts. Gebru suspected they were sock puppets, fake profiles created for the sole purpose of harassment, since many had popped up around her firing. Some claimed to work in tech, using phrases like “pro-DEI minority,” “She/them,” and “LBGTQ Latinx” in their bios. When Emily M. Bender, a computational linguistics professor at the University of Washington and Gebru’s co-author on the paper, reported one of these accounts for harassment, Domingos implied she was being prejudiced.

(...) When Gebru pushed back at the men on Twitter, it only seemed to inflame them further. Once, she cracked and told Domingos to go fuck himself. “This is how an AI ethicist speaks to a fellow computer scientist,” he responded. Gebru felt like she’d fallen into his trap, though she didn’t regret what she’d said. “That’s what he wanted,” she adds. “He wanted to catch me.”

In fact, Domingos had laid out his tactics for combating “social-justice radicals” in an article in Quillette. “Goad [the cancel crowd] into overreaching,” he said. “Mock them mercilessly.” He added that “cancelers take themselves extremely seriously, imagining themselves to be social-justice angels whose holy ends justify every imaginable means. Their sanctimonious spirit is a gift to you, if you call it out instead of playing along with its conceit.”