dude1818 I figure seeing ghosts was a genetic thing the toudens have
Given the way their father behaves I'm now imagining that he also sees ghosts but just decided not to mention it the way Laios ignored it for like 6 episodes
seen from China

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Sweden

seen from Bulgaria

seen from United States
dude1818 I figure seeing ghosts was a genetic thing the toudens have
Given the way their father behaves I'm now imagining that he also sees ghosts but just decided not to mention it the way Laios ignored it for like 6 episodes

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Reply-Reply to dude1818: Numbers Game
dude1818
If someone writes out all the zeroes in million or billion, it's basically guaranteed to be propaganda
XD I never thought of it like that, but thatās actl a pretty good tip, so thank you for it :p :p
You all remember the egg, yes?
Classical mechanics professor
Does the M20 card Mystic Forge work with morph? Or does it check the color of the card as it exists in your library, before you put it on the stack face down?
Yes, you can do this.
The morph (or megamorph) ability of the card allows you to cast it face down as a colorless card and Mystic Forge allows you to cast colorless cards from the top of your library, so the two abilities in tandem allow you to cast that morph card face down from the top of your library, no matter what its printed colors might be! Cool!
dude1818 replied to your post
āI think a huge part of the ignorance about aromanticism is that people...ā
This description of a QPR 100% applies to romantic relationships though. In what way is it different?
Iām assuming that youāre asking in good faith, so Iāll give as thorough answer as I can.
The term āQPRā was coined to describe a relationship that isnāt romantic in nature, but exists beyond the boundaries of what most people would define as typical friendships. Theyāre different to romantic relationships, because the people in them donāt have romantic feelings for each other, or a desire for romance. The term was coined because describing somebody as aĀ āfriendā just because youāre not romantically involved with one another, doesnāt really accurately portray the kind of relationships some ace and aro people have.
And also because many behaviours that would be considered perfectly normal if you define youāre in love with each other, but be considered bizarre, even unhealthy, if youāre not. For example, friends are expected to have independent lives, while itās considered normal for romantic partners to share almost every aspect of their lives - their living space, their bank account, their bed, their bodies, their time etc. Similarly, if I said my wife has just got a job in Europe, so weāre selling the house and moving in a few months, nobody would see it as strange. But if I told people that my friend has just got a job in Europe, so naturally Iām selling my house and giving up my whole life here and moving country just so that I can continue our friendship without being long-distance, people would consider it strange, probably even toxic to be so dependent on another person and our relationship.Ā āYou canāt have sex with someone else or another romantic partner while weāre togetherā is a pretty normal statement, agreed upon by pretty much every monogamous individual. ButĀ āyou canāt have other friends who youāre as close to as you are with meā is considered unhealthy, manipulative, even abusive.
By and large, romantic relationships differ from friendships not just in the feelings that people have for one another, but also in the intimacy, the priority, and the exclusivity they have. Hereās a list of typical traits commonly found in romantic relationships (though by no means does every romantic relationships have to fulfil all of these, nor does the presence of any of these things mean a friendships automatically becomes romantic, these are just typical traits):
Exclusivity
Priority
A level of physical intimacy that isnāt often found in typical friendships (like sharing a bed regularly, sitting on one anotherās lap, lack of personal space etc.)
A sexual element to the relationship
Sharing on a level that isnāt often found in typical friendships (such as sharing finances, property etc.)
Having and raising children together
Co-dependence
Usually, especially when a relationship is serious, romantic partnersā lives become so intertwined they might almost seem inseparable. I mean thatās one of the main points in marriage vows - āwhatās mine is yoursā.
But itās possible to want some or even all of those traits in your relationship with another person, without having any romantic feelings for the other person. You can want to share your life with somebody else (in a way that isnāt typical of friendships) without being in love with them.
There is an intimacy, a trust, a kind of partnership and reliability that we expect from romantic relationships - desires or needs which arenāt fulfilled by friendships. And aromantic and asexual people can desire some of those traits, can desire the things that you get out of those relationships, without having any desire for a romance or sex.
You can have somebody in your life that you want to put first above all others, you want that relationship to take priority, you want to live with them and you like being physically intimate with them like sharing a bed. You can want all that without being in love with them, and without necessarily wanting all of the other traits commonly found in romantic relationships. Closeness doesnāt necessarily equal romantic inclinations.
QPRs are relationships that exist somewhere between the common boundaries of typical friendships or romantic relationships. They exist in the grey area. Because those two words just arenāt enough to encapsulate the diversity of our experiences. And they come in many forms - for some people their partnership might have almost all the traits of a typical romantic relationship, they just donāt have any romantic feelings for one another. For another person, their QPR might be that they are housemates, and they share a bank account and are raising children together.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Audio posts may be easier for you to make, but it also ruins the accessibility of your blog. I don't personally *require* text posts, but audio posts are an order of magnitude more difficult to consume as an audience. (But also, yay you're back!)
Iām very aware of accessibility issues with audio posts. Iād want to find a transcription program - I remember running across one a few years ago but have lost it now (gah) that would attempt to auto-transcribe, and then I could add sentence breaks & other punctuation as needed.
Iād love to find auto-transcription software for other reasons; recently, all I find when I go looking is āhow to set captions on Youtubeā (I donāt want to upload to Youtube) and ātranscription programs with start/stop featuresā so you can type out the text. Very little that will take sounds and convert to text and then let you edit.
Aside from ābeing accessible to a wide audience,ā I rarely listen to audio online and would drop anything I was subscribed to that switched to sound only, so Iām not likely to do that.
Sound + auto transcription + formatting would be easier for me than typing the posts from scratch; Iām quick with formatting, and it uses a different part of my concentration.
What are some of the most *unusual* cards you've been asked to sign?
Playing cards.
I think Hussie was going for a time dilation thing with the 3 years to cross the yellow yard, but in reverse. Traveling at 99% light speed, time slows down by 86%. Light takes 3.05 ns to cross a yard; Hussiebot sees them take 3.08 ns; they should only experience 0.43 ns. He just picked 3 years to match it back up with the audience's time.
Thatās fair enough, itās just⦠man. Why not make the distance 3 lightyears somehow, rather than literally reverse physics? Or lampshade the inconsistency, and turn it into a lol?