The central government forces idle gas-based power plants into operation through emergency directives, locking them into rigid, backward-looking compensation frameworks. State distribution companies bear the consequence, absorbing the delayed settlement costs when dynamic fuel prices mathematically outpace the static regulatory reimbursement formulas.
The "Procedure for implementation of MoP scheme for operation of Gas Based Stations (GBS)" allows grid operators to mandate the dispatch of stranded gas assets to meet critical peak demand. Because domestic gas is fundamentally illiquid, these plants must rely on spot market liquefied natural gas, which fluctuates wildly in real-time.
The regulatory mechanism, however, reimburses these mandated operations using aggregated, backward-looking Standard Cubic Meter (SCM) cost averages. This creates an unavoidable working capital gap; the generator must purchase fuel at today's highly volatile spot price but is compensated based on yesterday's average, forcing the distribution utilities to eventually bridge the mathematical deficit through delayed true-up petitions.
The North Eastern Regional Power Committee document titled "Compensation Account", dated March 20, 2026, logs this exact fuel pricing volatility, recording the Assam Gas Based Power Plant (AGBPP) claiming dynamic gas costs ranging from 15.90 Rs/SCM to 16.70 Rs/SCM across successive billing cycles. Concurrently, the Northern Regional Power Committee document titled "Ancillary Services Account and Regional SCUC Account", dated 20th March, 2026, records the structural execution of this emergency gas scheme, logging a 1,039,285 Rs. settlement specifically for the AURAIYA GPP gas station.
A localized 10.39 Lakh Rs. dispatch settlement matched against a floating 16.70 Rs/SCM fuel cost physically proves the administrative disconnect between real-time fuel volatility and retrospective regulatory compensation. Fuel procurement managers argue that spot market gas prices change by the minute, making it computationally impossible for the regulatory grid accounts to settle emergency dispatch orders in real-time without introducing massive daily accounting errors.
While real-time settlement of volatile global commodities is administratively complex, utilizing a backward-looking cost-recovery mechanism for emergency interventions structurally forces the generation company to act as an uncompensated short-term lender to the grid. The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission is likely to face a cascade of working capital petitions from gas plant operators seeking carrying costs.
Until the compensation formula is pegged directly to a daily fuel index rather than a monthly average, mid-scale gas dispatch settlements will persistently distort state utility ledgers.
For more such stories, go to www.energylineindia.com













