#ad tech

Section 230 has been mentioned with increasing frequency as of late (in the podcasts I listen to, and my newsfeed, anyway). CEO Tim Apple was interviewed by Kara Swisher a few months back, and in it he mentioned that he believes platforms (Apple, Facebook/Meta, Twitter, etc) have a responsibility to ensure that ‘bad content’ doesn’t find roots and is removed ASAP. Here’s the most relevant quote (because you know how CEO’s talk in circles and any one point can only be understood when you listen to the whole speech). (I don’t know how to enter a line break without making the next bullet point start over at 1 again sorry so I’ll just paste this quote here) “Well, I can only speak for Apple. And from the very start, we’ve always believed in curation. And so we review every app that goes on the store. That doesn’t mean that we’re perfect at doing it. We’re not. But we care deeply about what we’re offering our users. And when we have a news product like Apple News, we have human editors that are selecting the key stories. And so, they’re avoiding all of the misinformation that is out there. The reality is that the web in some areas has become a dark place. And without curation, you wind up with this firehose of things that I would not want to put into an amplifier.” I can somewhat understand the point he makes about caring deeply over what they offer their users; and I know some people have said that this means Apple is ‘family friendly’ which comes with a host of problems re: queer kids, but tbh I think this ‘Apple is just family friendly’ explanation is too simplistic; not that it’s completely wrong, but it’s definitely not even a fraction of the full picture. Do you think Apple is trying to get ahead of whatever reforms may be coming? And so they’re proactively ‘curating’ the content in the sub-platforms (tumblr, twitter, reddit) they have on their platform?

I don’t 100% agree with Epic. If I were a developer I think I’d also be pissed that I have to pay an annual $90 fee (IIRC) PLUS 15% to 30% depending on my revenue and the app/service category. I thought it was hilarious how you can pretty much superimpose Epic’s behaviour with that of Meta (nee Facebook) re: the ‘we’re standing up for small <developers/businesses>’. I think Tim Epic knows that’s bull. This is just one corporate billionaire fighting with another one. However. I am glad that Epic did what they did because it shed at least a little light on how disparaged some/most developers feel. I remember seeing ads on tiktok to download AR apps or ‘cartroonify your selfies’ but the second you open them it immediately prompts you to purchase some annual subscription. Hell, Grindr was scraping my clipboard upon opening and I only found out because of Universal Clipboard (when I posted it to the community forum, no one knew how to even answer- they just explain what Universal Clipboard is, but then apple cold called me a few days later (I stg I didn’t have my number on that account)). So Apple’s strict app review process that they’re propping up as a defence in this antitrust/sideloading debacle is total BS. All that said (and also noting that Epic went after Google as well?) do you believe Apple should allow more than one App Store? And do you think there should be a % cut that they take from developers, depending on the success of their apps re: in-app purchases. What are they actually giving back to the devs with these fees?? I initially thought it was the support documentation and really interesting videos they have but like you can literally access that for free with a developer account so??

What is tumblr’s stance on adult content. I’m genuinely confused because circa 2017/18 they said ‘nah fam none of that’ in response to Apple’s something. But it’s been how long and the content still exists and more is being published as we speak. (“As we speak” who do I think I am? 🤦‍♀️) I think, if memory serves, Apple updated their App Store guidelines in October 2021 and I think tumblr issued 6 updates since then before the ‘this content is hidden you can’t do anything about it’ update? And it makes sense now because I remember suddenly needing to flick a switch for reddit and twitter. What took tumblr so long to implement this button? Initially I thought it’s because their TOS v clearly state ‘adult content isn’t ok’. So a button to unhide adult content would be redundant since they dont want to host adult content in the first place. Right? Is it because it’s extremely difficult to actually detect it and get rid of it? How do other platforms detect it so easily? A few years ago I posted a gif/vid to Insta and it was taken down within minutes (it was just two people under a blanket and there was an up and down motion, nothing actually visible, but damnnnnn). Is tumblr saying no to adult content to hopefully ‘win favour’ with Apple’s sporadic and inconsistent App Review process? What can we the users do (other than switch to Android) to stick it to the Apple?

Why is tumblr contacting a ‘graph.Facebook.com’ domain. What does this mean? Apparently “This domain may be following you across multiple apps and websites to combine your activity into a profile.” I know you can turn on ‘Ask App Not To Track’ and Apple said that if Facebook the app does it anyway that they’ll be removed or something. But knowing how terrible their review process is, do you think they’ll even detect it?

Anyway, this is a huge question, sorry!

Thank you for reading ❤️

There's a lot to go through here

1. I don't care to speculate on what Apple's plans are. If Apple wants to screen apps for malicious code, phishing, and CSAM, fine and understandable. Beyond that I think they're choosing to editorialize and push an agenda despite already having a ratings system in place to categorize apps with adult content. If they see shitty anti-SW legislation coming down the pipes and decide they better get a jump on licking the boots, fuck em.

2. Apple's a trillion dollar company, they don't need to charge that sort of cut to put up dev documentation. They should only take the cut if you use apple to process payments and subscriptions, and allow third-party payment processors as alternatives.

3. I'm not at Tumblr anymore and I don't have an answer those questions.

If your website makes money from ads, your ads.txt file is like your guest list. It tells advertisers, “These are the people allowed to sell my ad space.”

The problem? If that list is wrong or outdated, you could be losing money every single day.

The Quick Fix

Instead of trying to read that file line-by-line, use an ads txt validator. It scans your file, points out mistakes, and helps you fix them fast.

Why bother?

More accurate bidding on your ads

Less chance of shady sellers getting in

More revenue (and less stress)

Real Talk

Cloaking isn’t dead. But old-school IP cloaking? Might as well be.

Affiliate marketers, media buyers, and grey-hat advertisers are switching to fingerprinting cloaking to stay ahead in 2025.

Why?

Because ad platforms like Facebook and Google now use residential IPs, stealth bots, and AI reviewers that IP cloaking can’t catch.

Here’s the short version:

IP Cloaking = Basic filtering, outdated

Fingerprinting = Advanced stealth, real-time protection

I just broke this down in a no-fluff blog that compares both, shows what works (and what doesn’t), and helps you pick the best cloaker for aggressive campaigns in 2025.