I’ve been thinking about how we use everything that’s available in the public domain about a person* to understand their character, a fandom’s shared understanding of (or disagreement over) what ‘in character’ behaviour is, and how it’s possible, especially with more minor character notes or underexplored situations, to use available evidence as suits your fic (and the aims you have for the story you want to tell) to create RPF characterisation – even using the same basic facts to inform ‘arguing’ diametrically opposite ‘points’.
*I’m focusing on RPF here, but really this same principle applies to fictional characters too. Although they can be slightly more narratively consistent, and make fewer directly contradictory statements. Because they’re fictional.
The Gallaghers are some of the most narratively coherent, argument-that-people-don’t-really-change people I have come across – they’re sitcom characters, but real! And we can make this assessment of them with more finality than we can for someone who has only been known for a podcast for the last two years, for example, because they have been in the public eye for so long. And because they have been very famous for such a long time, and there’s so much press and so many blogs/tweets and a ton of other sources, and we have some fairly reliable and fundamental information on their lives pre-fame available to us too, there are some elements of characterisation – comments and reactions and response types – that have by now come up tens if not hundreds of times. From these, we can build up some fairly fandom-fundamental ideas or what is ‘in character’, because there is such a strong pattern of evidence built up*. (And we love patterns, and love spotting them.)
*Although you’ll get plenty of lies and direct contradictions too, especially over such a long timeframe. Not that these can’t too teach you something about a person.
For example, there’s a giant body of evidence – words, actions – to point to the fact that Liam doesn’t like being told what he can and can’t do, and will tend towards some form of rebellion in many circumstances (especially when he does not feel in control of the situation), and yet ultimately who he wants to be for the few people he’s truly close to and really loves is a Good Boy – or, at a minimum, to be told he is one (whether or not he really has been good, which he might find difficult). It would also be relatively easy to posit a theory rooted in childhood experiences and behaviour for why this might be. If you tried to write a Liam that acted in a completely opposite way to this, even with attempted explanation and contextualising, this would probably be deemed by most readers as out of character.
(Of course, although there is always some fandom-built consensus, even agreed-upon common facts and tropes that are not proven facts but ‘feel’ true (i.e. ‘fanon’), there are also disagreements – or, at least, slightly-to-significantly variant views of what is in-character between fans.)
But particularly with smaller details, or facts and speculation that have never been covered or confirmed by press, documentaries, gig videos and any other publicly available material, we cherry-pick and construct argumentesque logic to tell the story you want to.
In one of my fics, I wrote Liam as saying about women (to Noel):
“I don’t mind a bit of hair on ‘em down there, like. It’s where all the best smells are.”
It’s mostly there in the fic to be hot (and to affirm Noel’s gender whatever’s-going-on-there), but it’s a suggested character note based on Liam seeming fairly smells-orientated when it comes to people he loves, his apparent willingness to gets stuck into sex (especially oral), and his tolerance for some bodily messiness – at least his own at a minimum. Rings true, right? (I hope so.)
However, in a completely different fic and situation – perhaps Liam refusing to go down on some girl, or, I don’t know, Noel trying to extol to Liam the joys of sucking dick or something, I could see myself leveraging Liam’s sometimes-lengthy bathroom and grooming habits, fussiness over things like food and clothes, the expectations built up for him by the likely state of groupies’ personal care situation in the body-fash (and low-rise jeans) of the late 90s/early 00s, and of course the constant low-level hum of misogyny reverberating around the Gallaghers like a car engine about to collapse, I could just as easily imagine writing a Liam who doesn’t really like heading down there unless she’s utterly hair-free.
Depends on the story. We don’t know. There’s too much information for a real person, too much inconsistency, to resolutely decide the unknown minutiae one way or another. We’re always cherry-picking.
(And then, blurring at the edges of empty space, there’s all the stuff we don’t know. The stuff not in the public domain.)
Think about it like building a body of evidence to support your argument. Not that you have to do original research and build up a whole dossier of background research for a fic – unless you want to! – but simply consider carefully what piece of information makes you think that person (technically, the RPF character version of your real person) would do x in y situation, and why. Writing fic is about putting these people in situations, always, and one of the potentially undervalued components of the fannish experience might be how we collectively build up an understanding of these people and debate what in their past and present results in them reacting the way we are suggesting that they do. They belong to us.
This ability for many things to be true at once, across many fics, is one of the most wonderful things about fic – and makes fic as a form rather like the people it portrays. We want the patterns – if we know someone well, we can imagine how they would react to almost any potential situation – and yet contradictions are everywhere. Use it.