Forbidden Pool thoughts (Jacksons films)
I find it interesting that Frodo chose to save Sméagol rather than have him killed, despite what not having him killed would do to his quest.
If Frodo let Faramir's men kill Sméagol, he wouldn't have to worry about Sméagol being questioned. which Frodo knows would happen, and is something he's fearful of. its part of why he told Faramir "there was no other". he doesn't want Sméagol to be caught and questioned, doesn't want Faramir to find out about the Ring. because he knows that would mostly likely result in Faramir taking it.
still Frodo decides to save Sméagol rather than have him killed. he risks his quest to save Sméagol, he risks losing the ring to Faramir to save Sméagol.
thinking even further into it-- if he let Faramir kill Sméagol, Frodo would be without a guide. but I think not having Sméagol as a guide would be better than losing the ring to Faramir. there's still a chance, at least, if he has the Ring -- with or without a guide. if Faramir takes it, all hope is lost.
but Frodo still chose to save Sméagol.
side note, but I love how when Frodo decides to confess that he knows Sméagol and doesn't want Faramir to kill him, he starts off with...
"this creature is bound to me... and I to him".
camera zooms up on his face, he speaks quietly, as if this truth is a deep confession, holds a deeper meaning. as if he is admitting not only to Faramir but to himself.
the camera then zooms out when he says "he is our guide." because that's not deep, that's not intimate. that's the excuse Frodo falls back on when he's questioned about why he wants to keep Sméagol around.
but he makes it clear more than once that it's more about their connection and his need to see that Sméagol can be saved. "I have to believe he can come back."
I want to loop back a bit. I know destroying the Ring gives more of a chance for Frodo and Sméagol to come back to themselves. but Frodo risks his quest to save Sméagol. meaning he is relying on more than the destruction of the Ring to save Sméagol and himself. he thinks it can be done prior to its destruction. he wants to see it can be RESISTED, not just destroyed. he wants to see that they can be normal even if the Ring exists. which makes sense, it's why he helps Sméagol right off the bat rather than waits until the ring is destroyed to help.
but going back to the quest, which is the Rings destruction -- i think after a point, Frodo's quest has more to do with getting rid of the Ring so he can return to himself, save himself and save Sméagol, and less about saving the world. "I have to destroy it Sméagol. I have to destroy it for both our sakes." He doesn't say "I have to destroy it for the sake of the world" he says he has to destroy it to save THEM.
saving Sméagol is a huge motivation for Frodo, and I think that's why in the end, once they made it to Mordor and Frodo realized "Sméagol lied", he lost faith in himself and his ability to complete the quest. his hope in himself was stored in Sméagol. he couldn't save him, so he couldn't save himself.
I think when Sméagol fell, Frodo felt he deserved to fall too, that they deserved the same fate. I think when he returns to the Shire some of his depression stems from survivor's guilt. guilt that he lived and Sméagol died when they were the same, and also guilt over not being able to save Sméagol. I think his hope in general left with Sméagol
I feel like Frodo would have lived much happier if he'd been able to save Sméagol and they both made it out alive. Sméagol would have been a companion back in the Shire, someone who truly understood, in ways Sam couldn't. they could have healed together and rebuilt together and had that level of deep understanding that neither of them could find in anyone else
good for you if you managed to follow this, I have 87 trains of thought at once going and I can hardly keep up