👀👀👀
Look it's important to be aware of the modern-day effects of imperialism but like. If you can accept a story having magic or dragons or whatever you can very easily imagine coffee without imperialism. The coffee doesn't require it in any form. I agree that there should be more fantasy stories set in the global south but also you can just assume, as the writer did, that any exotic goods just come via trade route
The thing about these "So you can imagine a story with dragons and magic but the coffee/potatoes/tomatoes is what breaks your immersion" type responses that any post like this inevitably gets is that they're approaching this as if it's a discussion about "realism", whether the presence of these crops is unrealistic and if that lack of realism negatively impacts the quality of a work on an individual level, and not about the cultural implications of this being such an ubiquituous *thing* in the fantasy genre.
Like... sure, if I can suspend my disbelief for a story with dragons and wizards I can suspend my disbelief for a story that features food products that didn't exist on the version of europe the author is basing their setting on.
But we're not looking at this on the level of *a* story but on the level of the fantasy genre more broadly. When nearly every fantasy story features a setting that is aesthetically and culturally based on the trappings of medieval europe as filtered through the author's cultural lense, and these settings almost universally feature things like tomatoes and potatoes as staple foods, doesn't that say something about the cultural landscape that shaped the worldview of so many of these authors? It kinda reveals a tendency for global north people to just take the ways in which their society has benefitted from colonialism and imperialism for granted. These benefits of colonialism are so deeply culturally ingrained as a thing that just neutrally exists and belongs there that they're unable to imagine a world without them, so when they're imagining a world based on medieval europe they anachronistically project them back in time as things that just exist there completely unquestioned.
Like I personally couldn't care less if these things happened in just like. One fantasy story. Or a handful of isolated incidents. Like in that case I would agree that pointing it out would be a bit of a Cinemasins ding moment. But when it's not one story, but instead the vast majority of the fantasy genre being comprised of medieval europe-inspired settings where people are constantly eating potato stews and tomato soups and wheatever, I do care about how it reflects a very particular cultural-level blindspot in how global north people tend to see the world.
[ID:
images 1 & 2: tags that read as follows
"people in the imperial core dont realize how much of the products in our lives are directly there because of colonialism, so they create fictional worlds that reflect that and then you have the weird implication of fantasy colonialism. you can say 'why does it matter for my fantasy europe to have coffee' because you dont know why your real life europe has coffee, and that these facts do actually have a death toll to them
the coffee example in particular its very interesting, because it'd be quite easy to justify having coffee in a fantasy story thats set in a tropical region, or in a kingdom that trades with a tropical region or whatever. but then you realize that never happens because. sff writers NEVER set their stories in tropical weathers, and i can count on one hand the fantasy worlds where there are prosperous kingdoms in tropical regions, and that opens the can of worms of: why is the default fantasy setting a temperate forest of pine and oak trees, or a snowy mountainous landscape, while deserts and jungles are always dangerous exotic foreign lands"
/end ID]















