Just a Gay Space Nerd

I'm going to try it.

Text in the image reads:

Writing advice by Chuck Palahniuk. In six seconds, you'll hate me. But in six months, you'll be better writer.

From this point forward — at least for the next half year — you may not use "thought" verbs. These include: Thinks, Knows, Understands, Realizes, Believes, Wants, Remembers, Imagines, Desires, and a hundred others you love to use.The list should also include: Loves and Hates. And it should include: Is and Has, but we'll get to those later.

Until some time around Christmas, you can't write: "Kenny wondered if Monica didn't like him going out at night..."

Instead, you'll have to unpack that to something like: "The mornings after Kenny had stayed out, beyond the last bus, until he'd had to bum a ride or pay for a cab and got home to find Monica faking sleep, faking because she never slept that quiet, those mornings, she'd only put her own cup of coffee in the microwave. Never his."

Instead of characters knowing anything, you must now present the details that allow the reader to know them. Instead of a character wanting something, you must now describe the thing so that the reader wants it.

Instead of saying: "Adam knew Gwen liked him." You'll have to say: "Between classes, Gwen had always leaned on his locker when he'd go to open it. She'd roll her eyes and shove off with one foot, leaving a black-heel mark on the painted metal, but she also left the smell of her perfume. The combination lock would still be warm from her butt. And the next break, Gwen would be leaned there, again."

In short, no more short-cuts. Only specific sensory detail: action, smell, taste, sound, and feeling.

Typically, writers use these "thought" verbs at the beginning of a paragraph (In this form, you can call them "Thesis Statements" and I'll rail against those, later). In a way they state the intentions of the paragraph. And what follows, illustrates them.

For example: "Brenda knew she'd never make the deadline, was backed up from the bridge, past the first eight or nine exits. Her cellphone battery was dead. At home, the dogs would need to go out, or there would be a mess to clean up. Plus, she'd promised to water the plants for her neighbor..."

Do you see how the opening "thesis statement" steals the thunder of what follows? Don't do it.

If nothing else, cut the opening sentence and place it after all the others. Better yet, transplant it and change it to: Brenda would never make the deadline.

Thinking is abstract. Knowing and believing are intangible. Your story will always be stronger if you just show the physical actions and details of your characters and allow your reader to do the thinking and knowing. And loving and hating.

Don't tell your reader: "Lisa hated Tom."

Instead, make your case like a layer in court, detail by detail.

Present each piece of evidence. For example: "During role call, in the breath after the teacher said Tom's name, in that moment before he could answer, right then, Lisa would whisper-shout 'Butt Wipe', just as Tom was saying 'Here'."

One of the most common mistakes that beginning writers make is leaving their characters alone. Writing, you may be alone. Reading, your audience may be alone. But your character should spend very, very little time alone. Because a solitary character starts thinking or worrying or wondering.

For example: "Waiting for the bus, Mark started to worry about how long the trip would take..."

A better break-down might be: "The schedule said the bus would come by at noon, but Mark's watch said it was already 11:57. You could see all the way down the road, as far as the Mall, and not see a bus. No doubt, the driver was parked at the turn-around, the far end of the line, taking a nap. The driver was kicked back, asleep, and Mark was going to be late. Or worse, the driver was drinking and he'd pull up drunk and charge Mark seventy-five cents for death in a fiery traffic accident..."

A character alone must lapse into fantasy or memory, but even then you cannot use "thought" verbs or any of their abstract relatives.

Oh, and you can just forget about using the verbs forget and remember.

No more transitions such as: "Wanda remembered how Nelson used to brush her hair."

Instead: "Back in their sophomore year, Nelson used to brush her hair with smooth, long strokes of his hand."

Again, unpack. Don't take short-cuts.

Better yet, get your character with another character, fast. Get them together and get the action started. Let their actions and words show their thoughts. You — stay out of their heads.

And while you're avoiding "thought" verbs, be very wary of using the bland verbs "is" and "have".

For example: "Anne eyes are blue."

"Ann has blue eyes."

Versus: "Ann coughed and waved one hand past her face, clearing the cigarette smoke from her eyes, blue eyes, before she smiled..."

Instead of bland "is" and "has" statements, try burying your details of what a character has or is, in actions or gestures. At its most basic, this is showing your story instead of telling it.

And forever after, once you've learned to Unpack your characters, you'll hate the lazy writer who settles for: "Jim sat beside the telephone, wondering why Amanda didn't call."

Please. For now, hate me all you want, but don't use thought verbs. After Christmas, go crazy, but I'd bet money you won't.

(...)

For this month's homework, pick through your writing and circle every "thought" verb. Then, find some way to eliminate it. Kill it by Unpacking it.

Then, pick through some published fiction and do the same thing. Be ruthless.

"Marty imagined fish, jumping in the moonlight..."

"Nancy recalled the way the wine tasted..."

"Larry knew he was a dead man..."

Find them. After that, find a way to rewrite them. Make them stronger.

yeah yeah i took an unintentional hiatus because farm stuff and no time and little internet. the bigger work is still stuck, sorta lodged sideways ever-given-style in the suez canal of my mind, but here is not quite a crackfic that I have inevitably taken too seriously.

I kept trying to get other people to write this premise and nobody quite did, so here's Shane Hollander taking Ilya Rozanov's word for it about his dick size, and maybe over-preparing.

Nine, on AO3

This Doonesbury abortion cartoon was originally written by Gary Trudeau in 2012, in response to a Texas law requiring women to have an ultrasound before an abortion. It was banned from many major newspapers, and they ran syndicated cartoons in its place.

Now seems like an appropriate time to bring these cartoons back, with the passing of Texas’ new law requiring the burial or cremation of miscarried or aborted fetal remains. I guess we’ll have to wait and see if Trudeau decides to write the sequel.

They wear suits, but they don't even know basic etiquette.