Brittany D.

So some fanartist drew a “sexy” (read: booby) version of a (cartoon) character who is traditionally very non-sexualised. Fans of the character got mad about it because it’s kind of groundbreaking how that character is written and portrayed and this art totally ignores the entire point of the character. They demanded the art be deleted. In response to that other people said, well what the fanartist did may be distateful but they have every right to draw what they’re into. The two sides fight for days and each starts a harassment campaign and even report their “opponents’” accounts.

So far so typical. But things eventually come to a head and they decide that this will be settled by votes - not through a poll. Through donations to a children’s education charity via each side’s portal. Whoever can get the highest amount of donation wins.

To play Speaking From Ignorance, all you need is a phone with a voice recorder, and another person who knows considerably more or considerably less about a topic than you do. The topic can be anything: from "how to bake a quiche" to "what happens in the Peter Jackson Hobbit movies" to "who is Florence Pugh" to "how does the traveling salesman problem work." All that matters is that one of you has a firm grasp on the material, and one of you absolutely the fuck does not.

Then the person who knows about the topic turns on the recorder, and says to the person who knows barely anything: "Hey - tell me everything you think you know about [X]."

The speaker is then not allowed to ask any questions. Nor is the expert allowed to volunteer any information. The expert is allowed to pipe up with a faintly incredulous "Oh--really? Do you--do you think so?" from time to time, but for the most part, the expert's job is just to sit there and make encouraging sounds while the speaker digs their own grave.

This is never not funny.

The reason you record it is because, very often, the first thing the speaker wants to do after finishing the recording is find out how you actually make a quiche, or whatever. Then you both get to go back and listen to how wrong they were.

Sometimes when researching the history of slavery you come across a connection to your own life that takes you by surprise. Here's a connection I only made recently.

In the village where I'm from there is one old mansion dating from around 1800 and a lot of small newer houses. That mansion has been owned by the same family for centuries: they are the local Protestant landowners who made their money out of selling flax, the plant fibre from which linen cloth is made.

The reason that Ulster (the northern quarter of Ireland) has Protestant landowners is an interesting one in itself. It was historically the most Catholic region of Ireland, and the most resistant to English rule. It was sparsely populated and had difficult terrain, plus dense woodlands and bogs that made the guerrilla tactics of the Ulster lords effective. It was actually in response to this resistance that the Plantation of Ulster occurred in the early 1600s.

As punishment for the resistance, land in virtually all of Ulster was seized by the English and redistributed to Protestant settlers from northern England and southern Scotland. These new landowners were forbidden from having Catholic tenants and were required to import further settlers from England or Scotland to populate their lands (in practice it proved impossible to find enough settlers, so these landowners often skirted the law and rented to Irish Catholics anyway). The woodlands were deforested to provide timber for the new settlers, to make more land agriculturally viable, and to make Irish resistance (which naturally continued) more difficult.

It meant that very quickly Irish families in the area were either kicked off lands they had lived on and farmed for centuries, or else had to work the same land but pay rent to British colonists for the right to do so. For nearly two hundred years after this, Catholics were effectively banned from land ownership, until in the late 1700s they were finally permitted to buy back the lands their ancestors had once owned by saving the money they earned by working that land for the descendants of the British settlers who had seized it. There remains a clear religiously-stratified class system in Ulster to this day as a result of this historic injustice.

What does all this have to do with slavery? Well, the local Protestant landowners in my village made their money by selling flax to be made into linen. Much of that linen was shipped to the Caribbean to clothe the enslaved Black people who had been kidnapped from Africa and trafficked to islands like Jamaica, Antigua and Barbados where they were forced to farm sugarcane until death. The very merchant ships that brought slave-produced sugar and cotton to Britain and Ireland often returned with a cargo of Irish linen, beef, butter, and pork. On an island like Antigua, for example, the ecosystem was totally destroyed by plantation owners who deforested everything they could to make way for a sugarcane monoculture, naturally resulting in a situation where food and clothing needed to be imported rather than produced locally.

During the era of slavery, Ireland accounted for a huge portion of the produce imported into the British Caribbean. Different areas and cities in Ireland grew wealthy off the unusual role of provisioning the slave plantations. While it was linen that created much of the wealth in Belfast at that time, in Cork it was beef. This is just one of the many ways that so many Europeans benefitted off the proceeds of the transatlantic slave trade, even if they didn't own or invest in slave plantations themselves (though of course many Irish people did that too, including many Catholics).

It's often said that Ireland is where the British practised the techniques of colonisation they would later employ so ruthlessly in the the rest of the world. In fact, many of the Scottish colonists who settled Ulster moved on in a generation or two to settle Virginia and Pennsylvania, no doubt using the valuable lessons they had learned from their first attempt at colonisation.

But although there is no way you can compare the colonisation of Ireland with the unequalled horror of the transatlantic slave trade, it is so interesting to see the repeated colonial tactics of land seizure and deforestation to enable large scale industrialised processing of agricultural products shipped back and forth across the Atlantic, whether it be linen or sugar.