Heinrix4life

Cassia loves birds, and Tzeentch has birds. Cassia could have had a wonderful path to Chaos, but unfortunately, things are quite the opposite, and in the Path of the Heretic, she has the least interactivity. Sad.

block and report the account for harassment.

(if they "reposted" other people's fics, the authors can absolutely report them for plagiarism/copyright infringement too, especially if it's on ao3 — ao3 takes both this and harassment very seriously.)

it's sad that these people are often the ones who claim to want to "protect" the writing community. but in doing so, they indulge in harassment, speculations, witch hunt and accusations, all based on vibes, and they drive more and more genuine writers away from sharing their works. so these people are the ones harming the writing community as much as ai does, if not more.

also, mind you, every ai "tell tale" — em-dash, short sentence stacking, "not x, not y, but z" type of sentence — is something humans actually write before (I enjoy using these things in my writing, and I've been writing for almost a decade now, way before gen ai became a thing), otherwise ai wouldn't have been able to mimic these traits to begin with.

but even if someone does use ai, which is something I don't agree with, harassment still won't make anybody the good guy. and yeah I'll never condone harassment. no matter what.

if you (general you) suspect a fic is ai-generated and if that bothers you, quietly click away from it instead of resorting to being a bully and risking wrongly accusing a genuine, innocent writer whose human-made work didn't pass your vibe check.

Abelard, the Rogue Trader has been turned into a marketable plushie!

Celebrating the Infinite Museion release the best way he knows how 💕 Plus a blank version below; for free use for other rogue traders or anyone else worthy enough to be archived ☺️💕

Medusa and the blind woman in love

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

happy pride month everyone 🏳️‍🌈