what’s up buttercup?

want to be clear that if i ever talk about a headcanon and then later discuss a headcanon that is directly contradictory to the first one, that’s because headcanons exist in a quantum state where they are all simultaneously true and not true up until the point where i discuss it in detail, in which case that is the one that is true in that instance. schroedinger’s headcanons

that’s what characters ARE. not people, but potential. many things, as needed, no matter how mutually exclusive.

OHH MY GODS GUYS, HELLLO? UNCLE RICK IS FEEDING US SO WELL EVEN STILL IN THE BIG 2025 I LOVE BEING IN THIS FANDOM FOR A WHOLE TEN YEARS GOING STRONGGGGGGG

"omg tsas is terrible!!" "omg the new book is going to be terrible!!" yes and yes but life is short and men have consumed far worse fan service so let me enjoy my gay rushed couple and my horse girl

Not “Only my reading of canon is correct” or “Interpretations are subjective and all valid” but a secret third thing, “More than one interpretation can be valid but there’s a reason your English teacher had you cite quotes and examples in your papers, you have to have a strong argument that your interpretation is actually supported by the text or it is just wrong and I’m fine with telling you it’s wrong, actually.”

If the text says the curtains are blue you can argue about what that means; but if you’re going to claim they’re actually yellow you’d better have a really good argument.

do yall think there is a universe where Jason was given to one direction instead of the wolves

jizzie 🤝 percabeth