but for real I loved s5 pt1. Will Byers revenge arc is about to go hard
$LAYYYTER
tumblr dot com
Cosimo Galluzzi

shark vs the universe
Stranger Things

will byers stan first human second
Show & Tell
taylor price
ojovivo
styofa doing anything
Three Goblin Art

pixel skylines
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
noise dept.

Discoholic đŞŠ
AnasAbdin
sheepfilms
Today's Document

seen from Germany

seen from T1

seen from T1

seen from Australia
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from T1

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from T1

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@ohohorla
but for real I loved s5 pt1. Will Byers revenge arc is about to go hard

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
âautism wouldnât have been difficult before capitalismâ ânothing that caused me burnout existed before industrializationâ well what if your boots feel weird against your skin. and your cape is itchy and too heavy. and your brooch keeps making an annoying sound everytime you move and this party is too loud and youâre hungry and thereâs pigeon stew but you canât stand the texture of pigeon so you ate some olives and now your hands feel oily and gross and you drank a little bit too much wine (bc thereâs no clear water. also it was too bitter) so now your head hurts and you feel a little hot but not hot enough to take your cape off and you promised this time we leave when I asked, Aurelius! you promised! and donât forget we still have a three hour ride back home you promised itâs not going to be like last time! or something of the sort.
the âLife only started sucking in the 19th centuryâ attitude as anti-capitalist praxis is truly hilarious like. personally, if the sun was even a tiny little bit too hot on the back of my neck while i was being kidnapped and taken as a war captive after *insert empire here* conquered my home i wouldve been pissed. praefectus if the shackles feel weird on my skin im killing us both
people are fine with my mental illness until i start acting mentally ill like girl i tried to tell you what to expect
just remembered shows used to have 20-25 eps per season

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
they should remake breaking bad but instead of making and dealing meth itâs a suburban white mom who makes soap and the same levels of violence, gore, and drama remain
polly pocket clothes
Boys will be boys
Iâve never been so invested in anything in my life
hvitserk + text posts // part II
(thank you pearl, @bragisrunesâ & @adrille88 for sending these đ)
âMay I?â âYou may.â
I saw this last month on twitter and took a screenshot! Heres an addition
Sometimes real life beats the shit out of movies can you imagine LIVING THIS

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
that went hella left
I need to know about her relationship with his mother now.
Learning to delete/mute/block before a negative comment takes root in your mind is a modern survival skill. If you're going to wander the overgrown countryside of the internet, you need to develop a quick eye for ticks.
It's deeply tempting to respond to the "well, actually," to the cruel assumption, to the unjust accusation, to the odious viewpoint. It's tempting because you're defaulting to the etiquette of dinner conversation. This isn't a dinner conversation. Someone is shouting at you from a moving car. Turn away.
This is an extremely good and helpful sentiment, and one Iâve subscribed to for a long time. Delete the message quickly and permanently. Last time I got a nasty anon ask I skimmed it, realized what it was, and deleted it. Did one or two phrases sit with me for a while? Sure, maybe 20, 30 minutes. I really wanted to respond. But if I had, that cannonball would still be hanging around my neck and present on my blog, and as it is I donât remember what it was about or even those two phrases that I thought I would.Â
I also am of the opinion that it INFURIATES the commenter/sender not to get a response, because why would they be a dickhead if they didnât want a response, so the longer time passes without one, the healthier I am and the angrier and more anxious they are. Itâs good for your mental health AND the healthiest form of vengeance!Â
My blog is my little online home. When junkmail drops through the letterbox, I throw it away -Â I donât put it on my bedroom wall.
Genuinely gives me such satisfaction when I delete anon hate and imagine that person obsessively checking my blog throughout the day to see if I've acknowledged them. When someone sends you a cruel anon it's important to remember you have 100% of the power over that interaction.
#I just think â¨theyâ¨
Disabled lives are not inherently filled with suffering and when they are itâs usually because someone put it there.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
When Utonium first creates the girls, he immediately panics about how to take care of them and drives to the store to get supplies and, literally, the First thing he says when he gets back is âgood parents donât leave their children home alone.â
Like Utonium went from Scientist to Dad faster than the explosion that created his superpowered daughters.
So⌠youâre telling The PowerPuff girls is basically just a Frankenstein AU wherein he takes some goddamn responsibility for his creation for once?
That is a powerful take right there
Theres a reason he is Professor Utonium and the other is Mr. Frankenstein
stupid leftists and their belief in *checks notes* the intrinsic value of human life
Reblog if you would burn down the statue of liberty to save a life
Hereâs the thing, though. If you asked a conservative âWould you let the statue of liberty burn to save one life?â theyâd probably scoff and say no, itâs a national landmark, a treasure, a piece of too much historical importance to let it be destroyed for the sake of one measly life.Â
But if you asked, âWould you let the statue of liberty burn in order to save your child? your spouse? someone you loved a great deal?â the tune abruptly changes. At the very least, thereâs a hesitation. Even if they deny it, Iâm willing to bet that gun to their head, the answer would be âyes.â Â
The basic problem here is that people have a hard time seeing outside their own sphere of influence, and empathizing beyond the few people who are right in front of them. Youâve got your immediate family, whom you love; your friends, your acquaintances, maybe to a certain degree the people who share a status with you (your religion, your race, etc.)âbut beyond that? People arenât real. Theyâre theoretical.Â
But a national monument? Thatâs real. It stands for something. The value of a non-realized anonymous life that exists completely outside your sphere of influence is clearly worth less than something that represents freedom and prosperity to a whole nation, right?
People who think like this lack the compassion to realize that everyone is in someoneâs immediate sphere of influenceâthat everyone is someoneâs lover, or brother, or parent. Everyone means the world to someone. And itâs the absolute height of selfishness to assume that their lives donât have value just because they donât mean the world to you.Â
P.S. I would let the statue of liberty burn to save a pigeon.Â
also, there is an extreme difference between what things or principles *i* personally am willing to die for, and what i would hazard others to die for. and this is a distinction i donât think the conservative hard-right likes to face.
an example: so, as the nazis began war against france, the staff of the louvre began crating up and shipping out the artworks. it was vital to them (for many reasons) that the nazis not get their hands on the collections, and hitlerâs desire for them was known, so they dispersed the objects to the four winds; one of the curators personally traveled with la gioconda, mona lisa herself, in an unmarked crate, moving at least five times from location to location to avoid detection.
they even removed and hid the nike of samothrace, âwinged victory,â which is both delicate, having been pieced back together from fragments, and incredibly heavy, weighing over three metric tons.
the curators who hid these artworks risked death to ensure that they wouldnât fall into nazi hands. and yes, they are just paintings, just statues. but when i think about the idea of hitler capturing and standing smugly beside the nike of samothrace, a statue widely beloved as a symbol of liberty, i completely understand why someone would risk their life to prevent that. if my life was all that stood between a fascist dictator and a masterpiece that inspired millions, i would be willing to risk it. my belief in the power and necessity of art would demand i do so.
if, however, a nazi held a gun to some kidâs head (any kid!) and asked me which crate the mona lisa was in, they could have it in a heartbeat. no problem! i wouldnât even have to think about it. being willing to risk my own life on principle doesnât mean iâm willing to see others endangered for those same principles.
and that is exactly where the conservative hard-right falls right the fuck down. they are, typically, entirely willing to watch others suffer for their own principles. they are perfectly okay with seeing children in cages because of their supposed belief in law and order. they are perfectly willing to let women die from pregnancy complications because of their anti-abortion beliefs. they are alright with poverty and disease on general principle because they hold the free-market sacrosanct. and i guess from their own example they would save the statue of liberty and let human beings burn instead.
but speaking as a leftist (iâm more comfortable with socialist tbh), my principles are not abstract things that i hold aside from life, apart or above my place as a human being in a society. my beliefs arise from being a person amidst people. i donât love art for artâs sake alone, actually! i donât love objects because they are objects: i love them because they are artifacts of our humanity, because they communicate and connect us, because they embody love and curiosity and fear and feeling. i love art because i love people. i want universal health care because i want to see people universally cared for. i want universal basic income because peopleâs safety and dignity should not be determined by their economic productivity to an employer. i am anti-war and pro-choice for the same reason: i value peopleâs lives but also their autonomy and right to self-determination. my beliefs are not abstractions. i could never value a type of economic system that i saw hurting people, no matter how much âgrowthâ it produced. i could never love âlaw and orderâ more than i love a child, any child, i saw trapped in a cage.
would i be willing to risk death, trying to save the statue of liberty? probably, yes. but there is no culture without people, and therefore i also believe there are no cultural treasures worth more than other peopleâs lives. and as far as iâm concerned the same goes for laws, or markets, or borders.
Well said!
This is an excellent ethical discussion.
The first time I came across this post, randomslasherâs addition was life changing for me. I suddenly understood where the right was coming from, and I had never been angrier.
This is also why so many people on the right fail to see the hypocrisy of trying to make abortion illegal when they themselves have had abortions. They can tally up their own life circumstances and conclude that it would be difficult or impossible to continue a pregnancy, but theyâre completely mystified by the idea that women they donât know are also human beings with complicated lives and limited spoon allocation.
This is also why they think âget a jobâ is useful advice. In their heads they honestly do not understand why the NPCs who make up the majority of the human race canât just flip a switch from âno jobâ to âjob.â When they say âget a jobâ theyâre filing a glitch report with God and they honestly think thatâs all it takes.
This is also why they tend to view demographics as individuals. They think that every single Muslim is just a different avatar for the same bit of programming.
Borrowed observation from @innuendostudiosâ here, but: thereâs also a fundamental difference in how progressives view social problems versus how conservatives view them. That is, progressives view them as problems to be solved, whereas conservatives do not believe you can solve anything.
Conservatives view social issues as universal constants that fundamentally are unable to be changed, like the weather. You can try to alter your own behavior to protect yourself (you can carry an umbrella), and you can commiserate about how bad the weather is, but you canât stop it from raining. This is why conservatives blame victims of rape for dressing immodestly or for drinking or for going out at night: to them, those things are like going out without an umbrella when you know itâs going to rain.Â
âBut then why do conservatives try to stop things they dislike by making them illegal, like drug use or immigration or abortion?â And the answer is: theyâre not. They know perfectly well that those things will continue. No amount of studies showing that their methods are ineffective will matter to them because effectiveness is not the point. The point is to punish people for doing bad things, because punishing people is how you show your disapproval of their actions; if you donât punish them, then youâre condoning their behavior.Â
This is why they will never support rehabilitative prisons, even though they reduce crime. This is why they will never support free birth control for everyone, even though that would reduce abortions. This is why they will never support just giving homeless people houses, even though itâs proven to be cheaper and more effective at stopping homelessness than halfway houses and shelters. Itâs not about stopping evil, because you canât; itâs about saying definitively what is Bad and what is Good, and we as a society do that by punishing the people weâve decided are bad.Â
This is why the conservative response to âholy fuck, theyâre putting children in cages!â is typically something along the lines of âitâs their parentsâ fault for trying to come here illegally; if they didnât want to have their kids taken away, they shouldnât have committed a crime.â It doesnât matter that entering the US unlawfully is a misdemeanor and child kidnapping isnât typically a criminal sentence. It does not matter that this has absolutely zero effect on people unlawfully entering the US. The point is that conservatives have decided that entering unlawfully is Bad, anything that is not punishing undocumented immigrants â due process of asylum and removal defense claims, for example â is supporting Badness, and kidnapping children is an appropriate punishment for being Bad.
#ivan karamazov#enters the chat (@the-world-lit-or-unlit)
This is really long but please read it
âConservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.â
âFrank Wilhoit
Conservatism does not care about the lives of the out-groups, whatever theyâve defined those to be.