Theย โsourcesโ arenโt even worth a response; the human brainโs ability to attribute feeling or associations to words is an obvious one, which stems back to ancient times in absolute clarity, because - without this emotional reaction - art in any/all forms would be destroyed overnight. The article isnโtย โfiction influences realityโ, butย โfiction influences out emotionโ โฆย
It means that readingย โRomeo and Julietโ may have me on the verge of tears, but it doesnโtย mean that Iโm going to go out and commit a double-suicide because I read the play โฆ newspapers, documentaries, and letters from loved ones could evoke the same emotionsย โฆ ban those, too?
The latter is too much for me to dissect right now โฆย
Iโll simply say that fiction can - and shouldย - be totally free and the artist free to explore any theme as they see fit โฆย โLolitaโ toย โThe Colour Purpleโ toย โRomeo and Julietโ all discuss problematic things, some even romanticise them, and yet we donโt ban these books, because they provoke discussion and have literary merit. On the flipside, tawdryย โMills and Boonsโ novels to hardcore porn DVDs are also allowed, because they entertain and provide a release.
It doesnโt matter whether itโs porn or gorn โฆ for kids or for adults โฆ poetry or fine-art or literary classics โฆ what we read does not impact our actions, insofar as a direct cause and not a correlation. The actual studiesย on this are vague at best, biased at worst, and debated in most psychology classes โฆ so far people are unanimous: fiction does not impact reality.
A good book -? It can make you think. It can make you reassess your behaviour. It can horrify you. It can arouse you. It can spark a lifetime of research. These are all emotion based โฆ the book has engaged you on a mental level, making you think about your behaviour and personality, and - well - maybe thisย is what scares you โฆ notย โcopyingโ the behaviour โฆ
@antielricest - what is it that scares you?
I have never once - in all my years of studying Literature - served someone I hate the flesh of her children in a stew, or demanded someone serve me a pound of flesh to even a debt, or poisoned a sword in hopes of killing my nephew โฆ Iโve never slept with my sister and then paraded the aborted foetus around on a stick, just like Iโve never stabbed my cousin to death to inherit from him โฆ these are all stories - mostly Shakespeare - from the same two cenuries a long time ago. Still taught in schools. Allย taught in schools.
If you think someone is going to copy fiction -?
Get them help. They clearly need it.
Not in a derogatory way, but in an actualย โsomething deeper is at play hereโ, because people donโt act out fantasies or fiction becauseย โitโs coolโ orย โitโs hotโ orย โso-and-so did itโ โฆ people who act out fiction wither wanted to/were going to do it anywayย or they were deeply disturbed people with an underlying illness. People do notย copy fiction as a rule.ย
Do you honestly think between cave-paintings on a wall and being able to buyย โHannibalโ on DVD, that not one personย noticedย โpeople are copying from fictionโ and - you know - bannedย stories and art outright?ย
What youโre scared of is people thinking for themselves โฆย
Let them think and let us get back to enjoying art.