A goddess needed a hero from our world to save her world, she didn't wanted to make her fellow goddesses mistakes and pick a random highschool student or otaku, so instead, she summoned a forth a world champion powerlifter and bodybuilder.

Kiana Khansmith
Not today Justin
art blog(derogatory)

tannertan36

pixel skylines

β£ Chile in a Photography β£
hello vonnie
π©΅ avery cochrane π©΅
KIROKAZE
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

gracie abrams
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Product Placement

titsay

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
π
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
almost home

seen from United Kingdom

seen from TΓΌrkiye
seen from Egypt

seen from United States
seen from TΓΌrkiye

seen from Colombia
seen from Palestinian Territories

seen from Brazil

seen from Vietnam
seen from Spain
seen from Australia

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Singapore
seen from Pakistan

seen from Germany
seen from TΓΌrkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from United States
@mikeellee
A goddess needed a hero from our world to save her world, she didn't wanted to make her fellow goddesses mistakes and pick a random highschool student or otaku, so instead, she summoned a forth a world champion powerlifter and bodybuilder.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
reblog if youβve had an online friendship thatβs lasted more than 2 years
genuinely I'm so sick of people wanting all fiction to be ethical. can we all just get a little gross with it. the point of fiction is that it's not real. we can be unethical in fiction; same goes with being perverted with fiction, being unrealistic with fiction, and being grotesque with fiction. not all fiction has to be ethical, not every character has to be ethical, and that's okay. can we stop with the puritanism. be gross. be unrealistic. be whatever. if I don't like it it's not my business as long as we're all clear that its fictional.
fuck you makes deeply self indulgent lesbians out of my favorite princesses
Okay, here's another Cinderella-themed poll to deal with earthquake anxiety.
Where do you feel a Cinderella version or adaptation should start the story at in order for it to really aim at what's important to the story (moments, character dynamics and development, themes and symbols)?
Where should a Cinderella adaptation or version start?
With her parents before she is born
Depicting life with her parents
Depicting life with just her father, but not showing the mother at all
With her meeting her step family for the first time
At the moment of her father's death (only if he dies in that version of course)
With the dynamic with her step family already established
When the invitation to the ball arrives
Other (write in the comments)
Different famous adaptations have very different takes on this. The original 1950 Disney version, has some elements of some of these moments but ultimately starts with the dynamic with her step family already established. In the 2015 Disney version, it starts depicting life with her parents. Rodger's and Hammerstein's famously starts with "The prince is giving a ball", a case of the story starting with the invitation to the ball. Ever After never shows her mother, just the relationship with her father. The Ugly Stepsister starts with her meeting the step family for the first time.
@princesssarisa
@ariel-seagull-wings
This is a tricky question. I actually like the variety of different starting points that the different adaptations give us: they all bring something different and interesting to the story.
I know that you, @therapeuticfairy, prefer for the story to start with Cinderellaβs early life before her motherβs death, or at least before her fatherβs remarriage, so that we see and feel the tragic loss, first of her parents (or at least her mother, if her father is kept alive) and then of her entire identity and life as she knew it. Youβve written that adaptations which start with Cinderella already orphaned and enslaved by her stepfamily feel as if theyβre starting in the middle of the story. I definitely appreciate that viewpoint.
But at the same time, IMHO, showing the whole process of Cinderellaβs reduction to servitude can be difficult. Make her give in to her stepfamily's demands too easily and she can potentially become too passive to like or root for. Yet show her receiving too much spirit-breaking abuse onscreen and it can become too disturbing for a family-friendly fairy tale. And if her father is a sympathetic character, as he usually is to at least some extent, then how can we believe he would marry the likes of the Stepmother in the first place, and if he doesn't die, how can we believe he would let his daughter be enslaved? Starting with her already in rags is the easier choice for an adaptation, because it lets the audience imagine how it all came to be.
Personally, if I were to adapt the story, I might start with Cinderella already orphaned and in rags, but then feature flashbacks showing bits and pieces of her old life with her parents and of the process by which her stepfamily reduced her to servitude. That way, everything she's lost would get its due, but without having to flesh out every detail.
I think with this poll being done, once again many people are bringing great points into the conversation. It is true like @princesssarisa says, that the beginning can be tricky to balance right. In that I think that it's very interesting how some adaptations choose to do this. The 1931 Aschenbrodel that resurfaced not that long ago, has her become a servant in her own home the same day that the invitation for the ball arrives. That kind of reminded me of how in season 6 of Once Upon A Time we see that her step family renames her Cinderella literally after the invitation for the ball, also the Marcella Plunkett version has the stepmother marry the father so they can get invited to the ball. Even in The Ugly Stepsister they have the invitation to the ball arrive almost immediately after the father dies and before Cinderella becomes a servant. It's definitely tricky with different runtimes to also determine where the story beats fit.
Ultimately I feel everyone's answer depends on how they approach the Cinderella story and even what you consider the main character's journey to be. If it's more about character development, you'll definitely want the story to start earlier, seeing her relationship with her parents and how they relationship with the step family is built. If it's more of a romance, you'll probably want the beginning to already be established and instead make more time for interactions with the prince. If your approach is more cinematic and about the visuals, it could even start with the invitation arriving like Into the Woods or Rodger's and Hammerstein's. I also like the approach of it starting in the middle and having flashbacks to how the situation came to be like that (prime recent example is Bridgerton).
For example, for me her relationship with her mother (think of Disney's 2015 version) is crucial because it showcases where her system of beliefs and principles might come from. This is very classic of Grimm's adaptations (and also why I like the 2010 Aschenputtel a little bit more over the 2011 version for instance). And someone did mention that the beginning is also determined by analyzing if it's an adaptation of any specific version or not.
These plot variations also create an interesting and important difference between versions:
Just how long Cinderella has to live as a servant.
In some versions, like Disney's animated version, Ever After, or the 2010 MΓ€rchenperlen version, she's trapped in that situation for about ten years or so, starting in her childhood.
In others, she's already a young woman when her father remarries, and her servitude is either a few years (e.g. in the 2011 Sechs auf einen Streich version, where she mentions that it's been five years), just one or two years (e.g. in Disney's 2015 live action remake), just a few months (e.g. in The Slipper and the Rose, where her father dies in the winter and the ball takes place the following spring), or even just a few days or a few weeks at most (e.g. in the 1931 German film).
That difference can create a very different impression both of Cinderellaβs character and of the story in general.
Butt in but I thought about that for a moment, I think I would like to see the after. Now, I know there some ideas circulating on Tumblr on what happens on "after happily after ever" and usually is "the prince sucks" or "the nobility doesn't accept her" and all dark fantasy we can imagine. Not opposed to them. But my idea would be to see...how she copes on being beloved.
She was mistreated and abused by her wicked step family and...now she is married with a man who loves it. Does love heals all?
If we want to add a dark element here: She sees her step family get due justice... and wonders if this is justice. Does this undo anything in her past?
Again, this is not to be on "the prince is evil". It's just...how she travels life now? Her family is gone. The last family she had, if she can call as such, thought so little of her and she witnesses them being tortured and killed. Is this good?
Maybe she felt vindicated for a moment.
But it passes as she is now ...wondering.
Why she wasn't love?
A fairy loved her enough to grant a wish (Cinderella is not foolish to count on a fae's love but either way, the fairy helped her for reasons Cinderella never will know)
The prince loves her
The kingdom loves her
The royal family loves her (she is not a noble but if a fae helped you....hey, that means something?
So why her step mom hated her?
Why her step sisters hated her?
Did her father ever loved her?
@ariel-seagull-wings

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Iβd be completely fine with βnot supporting media made by problematic peopleβ if the people making that statement werenβt defining βproblematicβ based on whatever standards they personally feel capable of living up to and comfortable adhering to.
It just feels like youβre picking one form of discrimination and oppression over the other.
Hi, is this about harry Potter? Bc I reblog a piece anti Harry Potter, if is not, well I'm still upset this abomination is still running ...each dime this shitty makes is used to make the live of a trans person hell. How can anyone take enjoyment out of this?
I mean, Gaiman did smth awful but you can enjoy his previous books bc the money wasn't being used to fund "I want to kill minorities".
You can see Caroline and know this movie is not the reason a trans woman or trans man is worrying.
You can read any book of Lovecraft and know 1) he is dead 2) he didn't used his money to kill minorities.
You can reqd a book about "I love my wife" written by the guy "I so cheated on my wife for ages" bc hardly the book is funding "hm, let's make cheating legal"
Terf queen is an exception. Nothing more or less.
"But Harry Potter is my childhood" so? You are a grow ass man/woman! Harry Potter is not even good as a main character or story in general. Go read other books, others medias...your nostalgia trip won't make you younger, only more pathetic.
Harry Potter is being used to hunt and kill trans. It is totally not worthy even make jokes on social media wig Harry Potter. Let it die.
As for the question.
I think many people who reblog this "you can't like this media is problematic" are usually the ones who want to come across as better than you: example
The game of "The coffin of Andy and Leyley" it has incest, it has cannibalism...it has many others elements.
What the antis focus?
"ewww incest"
"Well, incest is gross" the point is not that. It would be fine if the game had all the elements but incest. They complain just about this part...and can't do any argument about the game without "ewww incest"
It makes me think of the YouTubers who read books in their channel and do review and how they can't be professional. "Ewww incest" bitch, you are reading the damn book no one is forcing you to do it, that is on you.
Listen: the media could have the most abusive man you know but if he is hot ...you will have people defending. See the case of the book "The haunting of Adeline"
If you ship something the purity gang doesn't deem as good...it's ok to sent hate messages or accuse the other of horrible stuffs bc, check notes, you are making fictional characters kiss or fuck.
Media literacy is dead.
No one wants to engage in the media, even in the problematic ones, to reach any ideas or conclusions.
"ewww incest" and complain about fictional characters. I just feel their time could have been better used.
I did messed up my algorithm. Can you private the reblogs we did?
We can do that? I had no clue. If this is possible I would have to go to my blog and search for our conversation.
btw βdestroy you didβ is one of the best lines in mha
so many people write deku off as a pushover or a crybaby but he is consistently physically and mentally strong throughout the entire series
i cannot imagine going through what he has gone through and STILL being optimistic and self sacrificing
a lot of people defend his crying with βif i were in his position iβd cry tooβ, and while i agree, i also want more people to recognize that by crying so openly, deku also pushes back against toxic masculinity and the unrealistic masculine portrayals of limelight heroes like all might and endeavor
deku humanized himself for the time he was a hero BUT BACK TO THE βdestroy you didβ LINE omfg
that interaction with tenko i think perfectly framed izukuβs growth from the start of the show to now
izuku was so gracious to tenko during the final seasons and as tenko was dying, izuku still validated him through that line, despite his negative feelings towards tenkoβs philosophy
izuku reassured tenko that tenko DID succeed in what he wanted, and i think that despite tenkoβs crimes, izuku does love him
anyways yeah i love izuku i love tenko
i think they truly would have been best friends if only they met as children
a lot of people in this fandom like to claim anger as someone not being emotional when it is. It is the safe emotion for men to express according to this fandom, and other fandoms. So yes, Izuku is a breath of fresh air like all my other boys and men I will simp for. These 4 will take your kneecaps, but be gracious and show mercy in times of strife if their enemies have had enough. Doesnβt mean they forgive. They just see a fellow human whoβs exhausted.
Anger is a emotion where men created a whole RP propaganda to say it is ok for a man to be angry, not women.
redraw bleh bleh bleh
atlantic trio
engfraport c.1912 (?) ish

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
The Nerd Next Door Turned Out to Be the Magic Tower Master - By Coldwinter (7/10)
Wouldn't it be cool if you were cute enough to change the genre? This was supposed to be a horror game! Random death. Religious fervor. Standard stuff, but the saintess is just too pretty! Men under vows of chastity can't resist her, and the most powerful villain of them all has abandoned his position just to be her neighbor. To stalk her. How cute!
Return to Sabaody arc
Just another Tuesday for the Yellow Flash β¨
Portuguese ver.
Quick Sketch

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Day 1 - Everybody loves Jason Todd
TW: Main Character π Happy Birthday Endeavor! Dabi has a gift for you β€οΈβπ₯ A little reminder of what Iβm capable of <3