schrodinger's poc

(ps: the f slur also wasn’t meant for you! how hypocritical...)

if you’ve only felt attraction towards other genders, you aren’t lgbt. if you aren’t trans, you aren’t lgbt.

stop racebending asian characters. we’re already terribly represented in shit and you come and change the character’s race just so that you’re pleased? this is basically equaling to “asian bad.” 

this isn’t just about whitewashing, it applies to poc racebending.

bi/pan lesbians are not valid and you can’t change that.

it’s an identity that harms other identities. i’ll explain the mechanism on why it does.

lesbians are supposed to be attracted to other girls and female aligned nb only. that’s the definition.

adding “bi/pan” in front of it doesn’t do much, because bi/pan is just a root word. 

“i’m a bi/pan lesbian and it means that i’m attracted to nb also!“

yeah, that’s just a lesbian. you probably aren’t attracted to male aligned nb, and if you are you’re bi.

bi means two or more genders. read the bi manifesto dumbass.

“i’m a bi/pan lesbian and it means that i’m attracted to males also!“

that’s bisexual, clearly. even with the common non lgbt definition of bi being “attraction to 2 genders” that’s bisexual. heck, i’d rather that you identify as pansexual bc pansexual is arguably harming the community less.

the attraction to males part is also pushing the narrative that lesbians can be attracted to males and contributes the fetishization of lesbians receive in present times.

“i’m lesbian/bi/pan and i am not harmed by them!“

well, after reading all this you now know that you are.

salt or pepper?

personally, i choose salt. it’s the only common edible thing that’s a mineral, and it’s essential for the human body. it boosts more flavours than you might think.

although... pepper does add quite a bit of flavour to otherwise tasteless things. vegetables can be made into a swag meal with the shake of an arm.

i’d rather go without pepper bc i can die without salt </3

there isn’t really a limit for how intimate you get in a friendship. platonic attraction exists, but there really isn’t one label for platonic attraction

it feels like a microlabel at times and lowkey insults aros by calling their relationships queer...  

a lot of people who use this label just wanna seem cool and different. i’m not really talking about the people who desire a relationship but just can’t get one, those are cool...

there also isn’t a limit for how serious you can get in a platonic relationship. having a label for a “serious friendship” or “intimate friendship” makes implies that the concept of friendship has a limit. friendship really has no limits. you can move across the country together with a friendship. you can go on vacations together, with a friendship. you can go to the same collage. 

it’s the same concept as a bestie. why put a label on it? do you really have that much of a snowflake complex? (i usually don’t like using that word, but it’s the only way i can put it out in speech.) are you trying to use a different label just to seem different? unique?

is there a stigma behind bestie / bff / best friend that you hate? please, just be real with urself.