You know that thing would eat you if you died, right? *pointing to the false image of you that others perceive*
Game of Thrones Daily

gracie abrams

oozey mess
sheepfilms

untitled
The Stonewall Inn

izzy's playlists!

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
h
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Claire Keane

#extradirty
art blog(derogatory)
EXPECTATIONS
d e v o n
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
cherry valley forever
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Stranger Things

seen from Türkiye

seen from Colombia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Spain
seen from Iraq

seen from Germany
seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Peru
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Morocco

seen from Türkiye
seen from T1
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Canada
seen from Argentina
seen from Chile
@lordsnek
You know that thing would eat you if you died, right? *pointing to the false image of you that others perceive*

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
No one talks about how hard it is, when you hang out with freaks on the regular/are one, to write metaphors and allegories without running into thematic dissonance. Portray grief as a lanky, stalking yet unmoving figure? It's kinda cute, I feel like it just wants a friend. Portray addiction as a bloodthirsty hellhound? It's kinda cute, I feel like it just wants a friend. Portray systemic oppression as an uncaring machine/superstructure? It's kinda cute, I feel like it just wants a friend.
It still works, you just have to recognize the new themes trying to break free. Grief is wanting a friend but they're not there when you turn to them. The hounds of addiction always return because you keep feeding them. Systemic oppression is surrounded by the bones of captured souls who swear they can fix it. Lots of things are alluring and frightening, you just have to find a way to make it work with what you want to say
You're telling me a french fried this
Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: fried_rice_joke() takes exactly three arguments (2 given)
dont store a knife with the point facing down, it damages the blade. no, dont do that either. when you store it with the point facing up you might accidentally hurt yourself when you try to grab it. dont store a knife at all actually. your blade must never leave your hand, always ready, ruthless and waiting. you know deep down that ever since you learned the stench of blood you will never be able to cast it aside. or just get a sheath for it i guess.
imagine coming home and your mom found your steampunk clothes and shes just there with her arms crossed
she's holding up a ziplock bag of gears and springs asking you what they're for

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
person typing into google search bar: obfuscate meaning
google ai overview: Understood! From now on, all meaning will be hidden from you, and you'll be forced to wade through the dreary vastness. Whether it's things you've always held dear, or new ideas you've yet to discover, nothing will make sense or appear to have any real value. This could be the beginning of a fascinating journey!
this is all thats left of her
I saw an instagram reel the other day that framed the red/blue button problem as a trolley problem, and I haven't stopped thinking about it.
It showed a bunch of people standing next to a track that a trolley was barreling down, with the caption: "if 50% of humanity ties themselves to the track, the trolley will stop without hitting anyone. If it is less than 50%, the people who tied themselves will get run over by the trolley and die. Do you tie yourself to the track?"
So I think the intention was for it to be the same problem in a different context. But this change makes it a very different problem. Basically everyone has already pressed the red button by default - framing the red button as inaction. This means there's no reason to take action. Everyone is already safe, and tying yourself to the track is essentially killing yourself unless a ton of other people decide to do it too. If the red button is inaction, then inaction is the obvious choice.
But I think red button pushers view it as the same problem because of how obvious it seems to them that the red button is the correct choice, even the "default" one.
So I came up with another version of it that frames the blue button as inaction. "All of humanity is standing on the track, but luckily there is no trolley heading toward them so everybody is safe. However, if at least 50% of humanity steps off the track, a trolley will drive toward the people remaining on the track, killing the remainder. Do you step off the track?"
And yeah. Now the obvious choice is to stay on the track. Sure, stepping off the track guarantees your personal safety, but everybody is already safe. Stepping off is directly contributing to murdering people with a trolley.
If you really wanted to represent the same problem as a trolley problem, you might do it like this: "You must either tie yourself to the track or get in the trolley. If you're in the trolley you are safe, but if at least 50% of people get into the trolley, then it will drive toward whoever is on the track and kill them."
Anyway. I just thought it was interesting that if you represent either button as inaction, then inaction seems to become the obvious choice.
I think this says more about the nature of Schelling points than it does about action versus inaction. You can also change the question to, for example, ask people nicely to choose red, and that changes the percent at which I'd switch, because it makes it clear there's an expectation that we should coordinate around one option. I'm pretty sure the important ingredient here isn't action, but rather that it feels intuitively strange to tie yourself to the track, so it's common knowledge that people are less likely to put themselves at risk.
If you want to check this intuition, you can have something like "you will definitely die if you don't tie yourself to a track; one has a train coming with blue button rules, one has no train coming". Now no choice represents inaction (since you're tying yourself to a track no matter what) but I think it's mostly the same judgement call for me (with a little bit less strength because the Schelling point is weaker). This implies the Schelling point qualities are what drive the different result, not the action/inaction divide.
Overall, I think the trolley problem framing is unnecessarily confusing. This is partly because (in the problem as written) you can just look over and see how many people are on the track, and this game stops being interesting if people can coordinate. Obviously that's missing the point of the hypothetical and you could tack on something like "and also you can't tell who's already on the track", but I'd question how useful it is to add in the trolley elements at this point. The mental intuition of imagining yourself in front of a trolley doesn't work, and I don't see any additional reason to frame this as a trolley and not something like "drink this poison that only kills you if a small number of people drink it" or "vote for this candidate who promises to kill all those who don't vote for them", which fit more readily with my intuition for moral dilemmata.
to be clear, these are block comments
The view from Calvin's neighbor's house.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Imagine if astrology was real and astrophysicists realized that instead of building telescopes, you could do observations by just handing out out a ton of surveys. First detection of gravitational waves comes decades earlier in 1997, after a study of 300,000 sagitarius women finds than they break up with their boyfriends 23 minutes earlier than the cosmic baseline would suggest.
Normally this would be difficult but it turns out you can use their rising sign to predict whether someone will fill out a survey or not. Virgo risings become basically the physics equivalent of a model organism.
why do people pronounce it "processees?" it's not messees or excessees or sicknessees.
also I've probably posted about this before but I think that actually all words should be pluralized normally. gooses. sheeps. cactuses. vertexes. childs. persons. I don't see any issue with doing it this way
I am the exact opposite of this. We need "services" to be pronounced like vertices. "Guesses" like "guessies". I got kicked out of a public transit conference for how I pronounced buses.
im sure the first person who had bigger fish to fry was pissed there wasnt an aphorism for their particular quagmire
chud atlantis
Hello everyone, sorry to go so long without posting something. I caught covid in August and it's taken me months to start feeling relatively back to normal. I am still struggling with fatigue and some neurological problems, so thank you for your patience!
It is rare that the McMansion ever approaches the mythical, though it is, of coursed, steeped in its own mythology -- of bootstrapism, castle doctrine and, importantly, a total commitment to individualism. No one bereft of a sense of personal mythos would build some of the houses I've posted about on this site throughout the years.
However, rarely do those houses sincerely believe their own myths, express them so utterly. Often, there's a bit of cheek involved in all those Corinthian columns, even among the knockoff Rolex set. Whenever one does swallow the (blue) kool aid, well, it's very important to me. And so, from the forgotten underwater past of the greater Houston suburbs, I bring you: Chud Atlantis
(it is always more fun to quote the front bit of that Shelley poem, because the second bit has been misappropriated by Reddit.)
Atlantic in size (8 bedrooms, 9 baths, 10,000+ square feet), and in price ($2.8 million), Chud Atlantis is proof that, for better or for worse, we used to build things in this country. (Just kidding, this house was built, astonishingly enough, in 2023.) Its existence is baffling to me not only because it is anachronistic (it belongs in the Bad 70s) but because it is Texan. This house is, in the fullest sense of the word, a transplant. Orlando is that way.
(Shall we enter, then, the eye-watery depths?)
It's important that you understand that the most significant thing about this house is that it is blue. In an age of gray supremacy, it is nice to know that tacky can still come in more unconventional shades. No one prior to this has ever looked at a piece of dyed marble and thought: I need to make this my entire personality. Not even in the 80s!
Like many McMansion owners, these do not know how to decorate. One can only presume that the furniture involved is so heavy that staging also wasn't an option. This makes the house a historical document because from this point onward such rooms will henceforth be yassified with AI.
this kitchen begs for a concept food. it begs for 'gold leaf hamburger.'
I'm not entirely convinced that the Rococo period was ugly, but its imitators commit crimes unerringly and without fail. Furniture like this sits in a room like a big glob of meat. Instead of saying 'i'm rich' what it actually communicates is: 'i'm heavy.'
I don't know how you can make so much money and yet have everything you do look like the bootleg Chanel rugs they sell outside of the subway. Like, can't you buy the real thing, dawg?
This may also be the first house whose broad aesthetic is executed by way of direct to consumer printing. The FedExification of art. Or something like that. After all, the internet loves a neologism more than it loves its elaboration.
"What should we put here to fill out this room" all-time bad answer.
Anyway, without further ado, the back:
The suburban mind yearns for the miniature golf course. The suburban mind yearns for water while it all dries up.
If you like this post and want more like it, support McMansion Hell on Patreon for as little as $1/month for access to great bonus content including a discord server, extra posts, and livestreams. (Don’t worry! This doesn’t adjust for inflation! Now’s the perfect time to join!) By the way: new subscribers can buy a year of McMansion Hell for just $12!
Not into recurring payments? Try the tip jar! McMansion Hell stocks, much like mortgage-backed securities only ever go up! For non-architecture stuff I also have a substack where I write about things like the ring cycle and going to the eye doctor.
We taught this chimpanzee to understand autoerotic asphyxiation and he hanged himself

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
👎 good luck with that guys
I mald so hard about astronauts and I'm pretty sure it's not even ressentiment. There's just literally no reason to put them up there. We have robots now! In the 60s they needed humans to like...pilot the things! We have proper computers now! Stop sending them!