(via THOUGHTS ABOUT THE "ROSEANNE" MESS)
When you try to look at something from all angles, you make no friends, but Iâm compelled to do it anyway. That said, I hesitated to write this because as others have wisely pointed out, horrible things are happening all around us every minute of every day, and here we are battling over a comedienne and the ârightâ to see a TV show.
Many seem to think this controversy is about one person insulting another. Theyâve brought up Joy Behar, Jimmy Kimmel and other liberals who have âgotten away with it.â Â I donât watch The View or Jimmy Kimmel, but I do agree that anyone who has made bigoted statements or who does so in the future, should be called out the same way and, if necessary, face appropriate consequences.
I didnât defend Michelle Wolf for roasting Sarah Huckabee Sanders or Kathy Griffin and her decapitated Trump photo. I did notice, however, that the same people who were appalled by those two incidents are okay with Roseanneâs crap and Ted Nugentâs crap. So, itâs kind of like pot/kettle. Thereâs a lot of, âbut he said, but she said, and hey, he started it.â It all seems rather childish, except the anger we feel toward each other knows no depths, and the venom feels poisonous.
As far as comediennes go, I have always liked the ones who target institutions, government, and politicians. All of that to me is fair game. Iâll admit, too, there are people I donât mind them poking fun of, but those people are usually guilty of offending us and putting themselves out there in such a way that you kind of feel they deserve what they get. They are comedy gold, and I understand that.
But this issue is not about insulting someone. Itâs about destructive and divisive hate speech, i.e., racism. Thereâs a big difference.
Some people claim that what Roseanne said is not racism. Letâs see, there was the âRoseanne didnât know Valerie Jarret was black because sheâs light-skinnedâ argument. Except she knows damn well who Valerie Jarret is, enough to still be talking about the woman when Obama is not even in office anymore. Roseanne follows politics obsessively and knows all the players. She has made a run for President. At the very least, she didnât know Ms. Jarret wasnât black, but the âapeâ reference was not  a coincidence. And it wasnât the first time Roseanne tweeted something racist.
Then there was, âWhy are they offended if they believe humans evolved from apes?â âTheyâ includes all liberals, I presume, because, of course, they must all believe the same thing when it comes to creation, right? Wrong.
People who make this argument donât seem to understand what it means to evolve. Per Merriam-Webster, it means to undergo an evolutionary change. It is âa process of continuous change from a lower, simpler, or worse to a higher, more complex, or better state.â So, you donât evolve from something and still appear to be that something.
But the people who make that reference know this. They know full well that the ape reference is used to dehumanize and to subjugate. They did it to Michelle Obama. In fact, they were downright merciless in describing Mrs. Obama.
Those who make this reference believe they can pass it off as an innocent joke, or harmless insult, and that the rest of the world will be stupid enough to believe it. Â Sorry, but no.
Alas, there is the freedom of speech cry! That is a good one when all else fails. People donât seem to understand the First Amendment either. They think it means there should be zero consequences regardless of what we say, that no one should react unfavorably or reject it or use his or her power to handle the situation. These same people feel differently, however, when someone is saying something that they donât like. Yes, double standards, indeed, but weâll get to that.
Letâs get to that right now, in fact, because double standards exist everywhere between genders, Â parties, religions, races, and more.
And, of course, I canât speak for everyone, but when some celebrity gets caught with his or her pants down, as many have, I donât care about their politics. It is not about left or right, and it shouldnât be. Itâs about right or wrong.
Yes, sometimes Democrats get away with things. Sometimes Republicans do. Just look at the âCâ word argument. Both Roseanne and Ted Nugent have used the word against Hillary Clinton. That was way before Roseanne got a TV show and before Ted Nugent got invited to the White House.
The president gets away with saying despicable things all the time.
Similarly, people call out the predators and pedophiles in Hollywood, as they should, but then turn a blind eye to predators and pedophiles in the Catholic Church. They think because there are predators and pedophiles in Hollywood, all Hollywood celebrities are predators and pedophiles. No, waitâall liberals, according to some. Imagine if anyone said that because of pedophilia in the Catholic Church, all Catholics, or all Republicans must be pedophiles? Yes, it is absurd.
FFS, must everything be a competition?
Now, I am not here to defend ABC. Roseanne was the same person when they hired her. They knew who she was. Apparently, she also knows who she is, as she had serious reservations about doing the reboot in the first place.
It would have been one thing if sheâd come on playing the character she played in the 90s, and the show didnât have plans to explore and possibly heal the divisiveness with a real-life Trump supporter as the star pretty much playing herself, and liberal producers and writers. On the one hand, they were trying too hard to appease both sides. On the other hand, they were encouraging the series star in her belligerence and paving the way for her downfall.
And many wonât like this, but I do feel empathy for Roseanne. I canât help that. Â I do believe that this fallout has been hell for her and that she is not doing well. Besides that, something is clearly wrong with her.
Conservatives who watched her screech the national Anthem hated her then, and they hated her for many years after that, as she wasnât their physical ideal or very ladylike, and they probably figured, on top of all that, she was a liberal. They pretend to support her now, but if they genuinely cared about her, they would not encourage her bad behavior.
The smartest tweet Iâd read about this whole thing came from White House correspondent April Ryan when she tweeted Roseanne, saying, âJust stop.â Ms. Ryan told Roseanne to go on a retreat or something, stay off Twitter, off the phone, and stop listening to the enablers who are defending her mess. Itâs easy to see that people are exploiting her in a way that will only make things worse.
She needs to fix this not dig a deeper grave.
And, okay, I couldnât help laughing at the Twitter backlash she got from the Ambien excuse. She walked right into that, but I still feel bad.
Her âsupportersâ say she should not even have apologized. I say she should have stopped with the apology, no drama like, âIâm leaving Twitter,â only to come back and begin defending herself, justifying what she did with excuses.
Itâs not a good feeling, watching someone self-destruct. It gives me no pleasure to see another human being crushed, humiliated, and used this way. There is that part of many of us, where we canât look away from a train wreck, but it is no less awful.
And personally, I couldnât keep quiet about any of it. Iâve hated racism and all forms of bigotry from the moment I was old enough to see it for what it was. Â I was a child then, but Iâd seen no evidence that any one group of people were superior to another and Iâve firmly believed that we are all entitled to dignity, justice, and respect.
Still, I donât claim to be righteous and tolerant. I canât because I am genuinely happy to coexist with people. I donât claim to be tolerant because I am not a nice person who is just being politically correct. What I do or say along those lines is not for the sake of pleasing anyone. Â When I speak out against racism, I am not defending the people targeted because they are more than capable of defending themselves. Iâve seen it. I am defending myself and what Ibelieve. Iâm fighting for the world I want to live in. Lastly, I donât claim to be tolerant because there are things I canât and wonât tolerate. And, yes, racism happens to be one of them. It is crucial that we call it out when we see it, and itâs about time.
Š Copyright June 1, 2018 by Kyrian Lyndon at kyrianlyndon.com.
Photo by Alexandra on Unsplash