extremely telling when people are capable of assessing how ooc percy is/isn't in post-pjo book depictions of percy but annabeth/percabeth haters (usually the same people) wholeheartedly believe that 1. post-pjo annabeth is infallibly accurate annabeth writing 2. post-pjo percabeth is an infallibly accurate depiction (or a good continuation) of their original dynamic. you can hate any character or ship for pretty much any reason but many people who attempt to articulate and justify their hatred in logical reasoning end up making it clear that their grasp on those characters/ships is too flimsy and biased to be making those assertions and criticisms in the first place, nor do they understand that many of the actual problems with the way annabeth (and percabeth) are written are rooted in rick's misogynistic writing - and instead of calling out rick, they blame the fictional woman for it
oh so you don't like the judo flip scene? you think it only gets a pass because annabeth is a girl and percy is a boy? you think that physically attacking your partner is abuse regardless of gender? annabeth is supposed to be a good person, so why do you think rick wrote that then? why do you think the hunters' virulently antagonizing men gets a pass when that wouldn't fly if the genders were reversed? why do you think the amazons say that the chained men in their headquarters "know their place" when a group of men saying the same thing about women in bondage wouldn't be okay? is this maybe reflective of some hegemonic worldview about women and men whose echoes are blatant in rick's writing of women? are these writing choices perpetuating the belief that women are weak and harmless and men are strong and bad, therefore men can't be abused, therefore women's violence against them doesn't count? is it telling us that rick doesn't take women seriously, doesn't regard women as powerful, doesn't think women are equal to men and thinks he can only write strong female characters if they talk down to and beat up men a la 2010s black widow? is this why the aphrodite cabin is degraded for its femininity and piper's rejection of their conventions is framed as something that makes her superior to her siblings? is this why the longer pjo goes on percabeth turns more and more into the "competent girl/useless boy" trope? does that maybe say more about rick and his misogynistic writing than it does about his female characters? is this maybe why it's essential to interpret the books through the lens of feminist media theory so that we can avoid uncritically internalizing these worldviews or blaming fictional women and girls for their existence? oh you don't say
^like some of you urgently need to get on this wave and I'm not joking even a little bit




















