Ive often seen discussions on how people have more of an issue with being called a homophobe/ableist/etc than with actually doing sth homophobic/ableist/etc
Increasingly, I'm noticing this being true about believing victims, especially in leftist/left-leaning circles.
Believing victims is the right thing to do, so people assume that they do it bc they are good people who do right things. But then the moment it gets personal and the accused abuser is someone they like/sympathize with, they come with "I believe victims, but ..."
And this isn't to say that 100.00% of SA allegations are true, but most of them definitely are, and the reasons people give for their doubt are certainly... Revealing.
If having several women accuse someone of rape, in their own words, is something you struggle to believe bc the newscast that platformed them didn't do it well, that's on you. Most victims deciding whether to open up about their abuse do not know if anyone else will even support their story.
If a child taking back their accusations against an incredibly famous person is enough for you to doubt them in perpetuity, that's also on you. The amount of pressure in such a situation is so immense, you cannot be surprised at people being inconsistent, esp when they are literal children.
If the accused saying "they've wanted to sleep with me for ages" about their victim is enough for you to disregard the accusations, that's also on you. Interest is not and can never be consent.
You don't believe victims if you only believe perfect ones, and you don't believe victims if you only believe accusations against people you dislike. Read up on coercive control, read up on abuse and how it affects behavior before you describe yourself that way again.
And at the very least, if you are going to claim you believe victims, please remember that whichever victim you are talking about at the moment can read your post and watch your video and act accordingly.