Monterey Bay Aquarium
@theartofmadeline
Kaledo Art
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Andulka
Jules of Nature
Product Placement
trying on a metaphor
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
#extradirty
Cosimo Galluzzi
JBB: An Artblog!
Kiana Khansmith
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
wallacepolsom
sheepfilms
Misplaced Lens Cap
seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from New Zealand
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Poland
seen from Canada
seen from United States
@intjmastermind
I will post the results of my cats or dogs question once the responses stop coming in, but from what I've already seen I don't think there's a strong correlation. The only type that seems to agree is INFP and that's only because most of them love both animals.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I used to think that in general Introverts were cat people and Extroverts were dog people, but lately I've started to think maybe it's not so simple. This probably doesn't seem all that important, but now I'm curious and I need to know. What's your type and do you prefer cats or dogs (or both or neither)?
What's your type and what stresses you the most? I'm interested in seeing if there's a correlation.
Group projects.
Hey so I saw your post about Ps/Js and here's a fun point... because J's focus on action in the first or second step, you view action as specific, with general principles either informing that action (IJs) or general principles being derived from that action (EJs). Ps view action and principles the opposite way. Because we spend so much time collecting data before acting, we view principles as specific to a situation, and action as something that follows general patterns hence the "toolbox" idea
This is fascinating. It's incredible that other people's minds can work in entirely separate (and sometimes even opposite) ways than mine. MBTI has really opened me up to the diversity among thought processes and ways that different people go about the same task. Thank you for this.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
From the perspective of a P type, although I haven't got too far in to the mbti thing yet, I can find detailed plans incredibly daunting and restricting. I'm not really sure how to explain it but there's just something that switches off previous enthusiasm whenever too much planning is involved. So it's frustrating from this side of the fence too.
I'm going to go ahead and post this because I thought it was interesting and informative to read.
I have a question for my fellow NTs: do you consider yourself stubborn? I find that people often assume I am because I'm critical of pretty much everything. However, I don't think that makes me stubborn; if a new idea holds up to criticism, I'm more than happy to accept it. It'd be interesting to hear the opinions of others on this.
INTJs are a J type and we have Ni as our dominant function, so it's not a surprise that most of us plan every move we make. That being said, something I'd love to hear other INTJ's opinions (or any other J types' really) about dealing with P types. While they are great people, I often find myself getting extremely frustrated every time I have to work with one because they are so hesitant to make commitments and plan in advance.Â
Additionally, it'd be wonderful to hear the opinions of a few P types on J types. I often wonder if they feel the same sort of frustration when I want to make a detailed plan of action for something two weeks away.
Are INTJs often pessimists and misanthropists?
Some may be and some probably don’t see themselves that way. E.g. Personally I’d say that I’m more of an optimist.
And I think that many INTJs would probably agree that dealing with people in general isn’t really something they love to do. But social interaction can be perfectly fine as well - depending on the people we’re seeing / meeting / talking to.
Yours,
Sandra
I think most of us would say we are realists. We are very good at finding every single flaw in something, but that ability allows us to make improvements. Ignoring flaws does not make things better.
Some INTJs are misanthropists, but I believe that well-developed INTJs are not. I absolutely love hanging out with the people I enjoy, though as an introvert I still need a certain amount of time to recharge.
I wouldnt say I hate human kind/society but I think we can do better. But like  intj-confessions said, I do see/find flaws easily and Im not afraid to point them out, which is why Im often seen as a pessimists when in reality, I just think we can improve as a whole
Exactly. I think pessimists see all the bad things and say, “This is horrible. It can never be better.”
To which I reply, “Wanna bet?”
Honest MBTI Stereotypes
ISTJ: Practical and down-to-earth. Probably your mother. ISFJ: Always nice enough to be suspicious and more loyal than all your pets combined. ISTP: Probably don’t care about you, might still kill you in your sleep though. ISFP: Always carrying at least 4 daisy chains on them at all times; don’t take them to museums if you ever want to come out again. INTP: That one guy hiding in their room trying to calculate exactly how much bigger the TARDIS is on the inside. INFP: Starry-eyed idealist, so caring and sweet they might just rot your teeth out. INTJ: 50% standoffishness, 50% being right all the time, 100% better than you. INFJ: Spends half their time delivering melodramatic heroic monologues and the other half attempting to purify the ground they walk on. ESTJ: 100% committed to their life partner, the rulebook. ESFJ: Happy to make you happy to make them—could potentially create a feeling paradox. ESTP: Probably Kanye West. ESFP: The golden retriever you always wanted, except in human form. ENTP: Would probably blow up the world to calculate shrapnel velocity. ENFP: Like a bottle of fizzy soda, except with more righteousness. ENTJ: Like an INTJ, just better at hiding the fact that they’re an asshole. ENFJ: The world’s mother hen. May also be running ten cults of worship behind your back.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I personally like poetry and I'm an INTJ. I wouldn't say it's ineffective at conveying a point, it's just a different way of doing so.
I've noticed a significant number of NT's who added things to my poetry post think that same thing. I'm glad I wrote it; the responses have definitely helped me to look at poetry in a new light and enjoy it a lot more. It's good to see a fairly evenly split opinion on a topic within a type; it helps illustrate that even though our minds work in parallel ways we can still reach different conclusions.Anyway, thanks for the thoughts to everyone who has responded.
I have a very strange relationship with leadership. I want people in my group/team/organization to do things in the most efficient way possible and I tend think that I am, in most situations, able to clearly see the most efficient route. Therefore I usually take leadership opportunities; I don't want to have to deal with someone else trying to lead and doing things in a way that could easily have been streamlined. I'm aware that sounds extremely arrogant, but I'm an intj; what am I supposed to do? However, I find that once I'm in these leadership positions, I hate it. I abhor having to micromanage people and get frustrated very quickly when people don't get the bigger picture of what we're trying to accomplish and need to be given step-by-step instructions on how to do every little thing. So then I don't push to lead the group next time and I hate that, too, because usually the person in charge doesn't know what he/she is doing. When this happens I kind of disregard that person and do things how I want to do them anyway. This is why I strongly dislike most group work, except for in situations where every single person involved is just as/more intelligent and qualified than I am. Is this an intj thing? Am I just an arrogant prick? I've noticed there are a lot of people with my type here on tumblr, so I'd love to know what you guys think.
Put A | By Your Type
I’m curious about the type distribution of tumblr. (I edited it to add the people who reblogged) INFJ: || ESTP:| INTJ:|||| ESFP:| INFP:|||| ESTJ: INTP:||| ESFJ: ISFJ:|| ENTP: ISTJ:|||| ENFP:| ISFP:|| ENTJ:| ISTP:|| ENFJ:
Every introvert alive knows the exquisite pleasure of stepping from the clamor of a party into the bathroom and closing the door.
Sophia Dembling - The Introvert’s Way: Living a Quiet Life in a Noisy World (via dianekrugers)
I don't understand celebrity worship at all. I get it if people want to look up to somebody whose achievements they admire, but when people claim to legitimately love these celebrities and see them as I idols I just: ???? They're just people. Not to mention the fact that all the public sees of them is what their team of publicists wants the public to see, so it's not possible to really feel a deep connection with a celebrity you don't know personally. This is another thing that seems common among NTs in my personal experience, so I thought I'd share it here.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I hate poetry. Aside from it being pretentious, melodramatic, and over-emotional, it is an extremely muddled and inefficient way of communicating. Clear and efficient communication is the entire point of language. Prose accomplishes this 100 times better. Therefore, poetry serves no practical purpose that I can see.
This is an opinion shared by most NT’s I know, but I know very few. What do you think? Is this a type thing or is it just me?
I am ENTJ and I can appreciate poetry a lot. It’s a more effective way to explain intangibles such as feelings while capturing the common attitudes of the era it was written during. It’s of exceptional historical value when you want to get a view of a time period. The readers would’ve needed to understand the symbolism in a poem like Tennyson’s Lady of Shalott about the conflict between faith and the new scientific discoveries in the Victorian era that seemed to conflict with faith, like Darwin’s Origin of the Species and Geology of the World. I also enjoy being a literary and historical sleuth and it makes me feel good to thoroughly understand a poem from the point of view of the author, a person of the day, and a person nowadays by correctly figuring out symbolism and the use of meter and rhyme and literary devices to enhance the poem’s main purpose in conveying an innumerable amount of thoughts in a very concise way, all things taken into account.
I think most NTs do not develop this love of poetry because it’s not shown to them to make sense like math does. It’s all a matter of seeing the connections between y=mx+b and “When I have fears that I may cease to be/ that my pen has not yet gleaned my teeming mind.” It’s just a different way of writing the same equation. Think of grammar as an equation and it becomes easier. Think of words as variables and constants. Poetry isn’t taught holistically with history, theology, philosophy, and science like it should be. I was lucky in my school that I got theology and philosophy courses and my lit teacher taught us the historical background of the era of the poets and the relevant scientific discoveries before we even thought of opening our textbooks. When taken alone, the quantitative and qualitative importance of poetry is null. When taken with other relevant components, the importance of poetry is blindingly apparent. But that’s just my two cents.
This is a way of viewing poetry I've never seen before and I like it a lot. Seeing poetry as a part of history and philosophy and theology gives it significantly more merit than I previously gave it credit for. Thank you for commenting.
