βOne day there was an anonymous present sitting on my doorstepβVolume One of Capital by Karl Marx, in a brown paper bag. A joke? Serious? And who had sent it? I never found out. Late that night, naked in bed, I leafed through it. The beginning was impenetrable, I couldnβt understand it, but when I came to the part about the lives of the workersβthe coal miners, the child laborersβI could feel myself suddenly breathing more slowly. How angry he was. Page after page. Then I turned back to an earlier section, and I came to a phrase that Iβd heard before, a strange, upsetting, sort of ugly phrase: this was the section on βcommodity fetishism,β βthe fetishism of commodities.β I wanted to understand that weird-sounding phrase, but I could tell that, to understand it, your whole life would probably have to change. His explanation was very elusive. He used the example that people say, βTwenty yards of linen are worth two pounds.β People say that about every thing that it has a certain value. This is worth that. This coat, this sweater, this cup of coffee: each thing worth some quantity of money, or some number of other thingsβone coat, worth three sweaters, or so much moneyβas if that coat, suddenly appearing on the earth, contained somewhere inside itself an amount of value, like an inner soul, as if the coat were a fetish, a physical object that contains a living spirit. But what really determines the value of a coat? The coatβs price comes from its history, the history of all the people involved in making it and selling it and all the particular relationships they had. And if we buy the coat, we, too, form relationships with all those people, and yet we hide those relationships from our own awareness by pretending we live in a world where coats have no history but just fall down from heaven with prices marked inside. βI like this coat,β we say, βItβs not expensive,β as if that were a fact about the coat and not the end of a story about all the people who made it and sold it, βI like the pictures in this magazine.β A naked woman leans over a fence. A man buys a magazine and stares at her picture. The destinies of these two are linked. The man has paid the woman to take off her clothes, to lean over the fence. The photograph contains its historyβthe moment the woman unbuttoned her shirt, how she felt, what the photographer said. The price of the magazine is a code that describes the relationships between all these peopleβthe woman, the man, the publisher, the photographerβwho commanded, who obeyed. The cup of coffee contains the history of the peasants who picked the beans, how some of them fainted in the heat of the sun, some were beaten, some were kicked. For two days I could see the fetishism of commodities everywhere around me. It was a strange feeling. Then on the third day I lost it, it was gone, I couldnβt see it anymore.β
gracieabrams
romaincrisis
origamiaround
dailybridgerton
gummygunk
ellievsbear
theartofmadeline
blakekathryn
