this is why demanding flawless representation from every piece of media, and trying to police who writes what based on identity is a huge fucking mess
source
The publisher is now threatening to sue her btw,
Checked on this, the company issued a formal apology where they admitted they assumed the author was straight because she āpresented herself as straightā
She literally told them she was bisexual in the query she submitted
I know, thatās what makes this even worse.
That publishing company is such bullshit lmaooo
Their āapologyā is even more disgusting. They double down on the biphobia.
āNo other authors will receive any constructive feedback from usā lmao what a baby
āWe put you gays and lesbians on the purity pedestal and, when you really think about it, this ābisexualā (Whatever that means) is really to blame for making us realize you people fuck.Thatās why we were wrong.ā
āShe isnāt posting pics of herself making out with every person of every gender on Instagram, so she is obviously just a straight looking for attention :/ā
This song has been old for a while and it keeps getting older.
Along with its accompaniment, āthe slutty bisexualā
This saga really is an ever-growing snowball of unprofessional behavior and not knowing when to quit:
Assuming that straight peopleās writings about queer characters are bad representation by default, which has terrible implications for representational mediaĀ
Stalking this authorās social media to ascertain if she was queer or notĀ
Deciding that, despite being openly bi to the publisher and social media, she is āpresenting as straightā by having a husband and so must be lying about being biĀ
Rather than offering actual constructive criticism of her work, dismissing it outright based on representation alone (even later admitting that they had no issue with her work aside from her perceived sexuality)
When confronted, doubling down and putting the blame on the author for somehow being dishonest about her sexuality and for rightfully complaining about their unprofessional behavior, which is libel, apparently
Calling the authorās characterĀ āsluttyāĀ
Trying to guilt-trip the author by presenting the situation as a personal insult rather than a professional complaint, including the āif youāre going to be that way I guess Iāll just never offer constructive criticism ever againā rebuttal even though 1. That is literally their job as a publisher and 2. Their criticism wasnāt constructive in the first place
Defending their actions as support of the LGBT+ community while refusing to acknowledge that this type of gatekeeping only hurts the community
Accusing the author of being petty in one of the most passive-aggressively petty letters Iāve ever read, which was also characterized by grammatical errors that donāt help their case as a reputable publisher
This seems like the kind of situation where, long ago, someone had good intentions that went downhill when they decided to only engage with only the most unproblematic representation available.
Such an attitude negates the work of anyone doing their best who is writing about an experience that is not their own, or even representing their own experience in a way that makes someone uncomfortable. This is further evidenced by the publisherās about page, which states that they will not publish books that includeĀ āexplicit/toxic romanceā andĀ āany works that depict rape or have extreme trigger warnings,ā while not specifying what those triggers are. That is their prerogative as a publisher, of course, but purging anything problematic from your catalogue can often do more harm than good, as authors use these subjects to work through their own problems and help others do so as well. Thatās why trigger warnings exist in the first place.
Itās noble to want to hold up LGBT+ authors as much as possible, but this type of gatekeeping is not the way to do it. If you are critiquing someoneās writing and have an issue with its content, point out what has made you uncomfortable and ask for clarification on why they chose to write it that way, rather than jumping to conclusions about their intentions.
My favorite (ā"favoriteāā) part of this (that I havenāt seen touched on yet - the biphobia is pretty lovely too) is their prohibition on āexplicit/toxic romance.ā As, like, one implicitly connected line item.
BIG OOF. This just in - explicit sex is toxic! Iām sure such an implication has no grounding whatsoever in decades of homophobia and the characterization of queer desire as inherently predatory! And wonāt negatively affect anyoneās conception of their own sexual feelings, in ways that can be severely damaging to their sex lives and their sense of self-worth! asdfasfg
Itās perfectly fine, obviously, to want to run a publishing house (or a rec list, or a Big Bang) that focuses on fluffy, wholesome, feel-good romances, without explicit sex. Thatās an excellent genre of story, and many people want to write and/or read them, especially with queer characters. But say it like that, donāt go ājust leave out the Icky Stuff.ā For godās sake.
tl;dr - Let The Queers Fuck 2021
Note the bit about how they said they saw online complaints that her previous work was ābarelyā representation and āmisrepresentedā as LGBTQ+, which made her not qualified to write this more explicitly queer book.
Meaning they were looking to publish queer stuff for woke points, observed sheād already gotten negativity for not doing rep Good Enough (probably including allegations she was An Outsider who Didnāt Understand), and determined she wouldnāt be useful to them in that way and could even hurt them with the benchmark crowd.
Which is to say, internet backlash against queer content for falling short of some imaginary bar of perfection (like this stuff wasnāt even accused of any actual offensive qualities it just wasnāt āenoughā and was therefore proclaimed a failure) does in fact actively suppress the future supply of queer content, because corporations are listening.
Itās the time of year when we all remember Hurn Publications, because fuck you Hurn, threatening legal action against a chick for airing your dirty laundry?
Sheās posting āslanderā. I stg. š
































