Mediocrity at its Finest

Honestly I would never be able to live Scully's life. As adorable as Mulder is, he always did batshit insane stuff, which she kept getting him out of. And in some way Mulder made her life so much worse. Like I believe that Scully was also interested in x-files and it's not only him who was keeping her there, but the amount of times when Mulder straight up wasn't thinking about consequences of his actions and she was stepping in while fully understanding the risks and probably not wanting to be doing all that, but still saving him because she loves him more than anyone else... Sometimes true love is self-destructive.

If you write Mulder calling Scully “honey” just know that I owe you everything.

I’m gonna be so fr rn, yall gotta stop acting like women’s sports only contributions/offerings are 1) that most of the athletes are queer 2) some sort of “morally pure” version of the sport. you don’t realize that you’re doing it but you’re de-valuing them to a point of queerness + morality meter. which the latter is just insane when there are POS’ amongst women’s sports

“Don’t watch the NHL, watch the PWHL! They’re actually gay!” why is that the only selling point to you

desolate is such a great word

bi people i love you so fucking much

bisexuality is so beautiful and awesome and bi people can explode things with their minds

S01E01: *the only thing that could get them all in the same place at the same time is not getting paid* S02E01: *the only thing that could get them all in the same place at the same time is showing up to support Sophie at one of her shows*

NO! Where’s the non-metals and metaloids?!

are they hydrogen or helium

oxygen, carbon, sulfur, xenon, iodine, neon, etc etc.

ooo okay i see the confusion. you're listing off a bunch of metals there

…. You’re breaking my chemistry nerd brain. Hhhuuuhhhh???

im an astrophysicist

but but, science is science?!

and different fields of science have different conventions and definitions for their unique contexts

every political scandal has to be called ____gate now because 54 years ago a guy named blowjob told reporters there were bugs in the democrat offices

a few weeks ago i was thinking about how online there's always some discourse cycle or other where people go "everyone does/should/can do XYZ and if you don't you're a bad person / whatever other negative statement" and a disabled person says "i actually can't do that because i'm disabled" and everyone goes "look at this loser! bean soup theory proven again! nobody was thinking about disabled people this obviously isn't about you." which, aside from the fact that, well, yes, the fact that nobody was thinking about disabled people is part of the problem. the thing is is that disabled people also consider ourselves part of "everyone." on account of disabled people are also people, and thus fit into the category that means "every person." and this applies to a lot of other groups as well ofc. i've just been thinking about it recently like. is it really a "bean soup theory" moment or did somebody just (correctly) assume they are a part of "everybody"