To an extent, all us humans and humanity’s creations alike are bound by the history and context and expectations of the cultures/societies that originate us. There’s multiple sides of it- on the one hand, you have humans like the BreharWallHan workers who carry the trauma of the Corporation Rim with them even as they escape, understandably lashing out at help extended to them, their behavior dictated by their past experiences. But there’s also the beloved history of Preservation, illustrated by Pressy. All of Preservation’s values of care for each other and of providing for need unreservedly is on display there, its history passed down and preserved in an unbroken chain of love from predecessor to descendant, embodied in that lovingly, respectfully-cared-for old ship. The history and origins provide a context that can be binding or foundational, that can be claustrophobic for some as much as it can also be an assurance or aspirational in other cases.
But it’s true that we do not easily leave behind where we come from. And if humans cannot escape the reach of their origins, then bots, whose behavior and existence are dictated by their code, who were created with the purpose of serving human interests written into that code and who are defined by their function, must be even more bound. With few if any of the benefits of being bound, perhaps. Especially for those machine intelligences whose function is essentially violent.
That question “Would it make a difference if I was hacked?” struck me really hard, too, and I think it’s tied in to the way there is ambiguity in whether Balin and its secondary function are the same person or not. JollyBaby clearly thinks they are separate, but Murderbot itself is equivocal about the distinction and presents JollyBaby’s framing as one opinion. (Man, there’s a LOT more meta that I want to write about JollyBaby and the culture/community of Preservation bots vs Murderbot and its CR history/experiences)
There is a point that Balin (Balin, who has lived among humans and earned their trust and respect across multiple human generations, who knows both how these humans think about personhood/agency and what it is to be a bot with identity/personhood) brings up with that question. This point is that if it was programmed that way since the beginning, it would simply be the bot it was created as- and if Balin’s code had been altered that would simply, cruelly, be the new person it is, and the old one gone. To what extent is Balin and its secondary function separable as people? Is a bot defined by its code and function and its feed ID? After all, a bot is an entity whose personhood and purpose and function and fate were originated and shaped by its creators. More even than humans being the result of the cultures that shaped them, Balin is not able to escape its history.
Murderbot, despite being a bot/human construct and ostensibly more flexible, would be justified in fearing that it can’t escape the reach of its origins either.
But this is where I go back to JollyBaby and the other bots, surrounding and towering over Murderbot and Balin, to the scene where JollyBaby’s hand comes down between the two ex-CR combatants. In that moment they are literally framed by the physical presence of the other bots as much as JollyBaby also reframes the moment and Balin’s role in it as that of someone innocent victimized by a violent intruder now lashing out at those around it, humans and bots both. The bots don’t move to attack or subdue; instead they wait in an unspeaking silence that promises, We will protect those you try to hurt, others and each other. Your only recourse is to cease your violence. And neither Murderbot nor Balin are able to reject this framing. Murderbot admits that it’s not sure that JollyBaby and its cohort are wrong about Balin and CombatBot being separate, and Balin/CombatBot, surrounded by the bots its primary function had worked alongside for decades, shuts itself down. The conflict is resolved without further violence.
That’s the power of community, I think. Context that is support, that can provide us more options than on our own, that has the power to reshape, reframe, restructure who we are. People are defined by their community, humans and bots alike.
No, we don’t escape what made us what we are so easily. But we can change how we think about who we are and what our situation is; we can move on to new places, and every place we go to also becomes part of the context that informs who we are and what we do.
So long as we are surrounded by a community that supports us and will intervene for us, we are both held in check and empowered to hope for choices better than what our origins leave us with.
(Thanks also to LT on the Murderbot Discord, who brought up that this scene is pivotal from the lens of reading Murderbot as a victimized but cop-adjacent character who is now officially engaged in police activity. The murderer is caught not due to police violence but due to community intervention, and wow there’s so much more to unpack in an analysis from that lens!! <3 )