carlumbo

If you’re not in his target demo of loser, sorry I mean millennial-to-genX grindset startup bro with a hard-on for networking with venture capitalists, then you’re probably not in Nico’s LinkedIn circle and you might not know that he is ACTIVE. He is posting 2-3 times a week, he is responding to comments, this is his primary social media output, and the content isn’t crossposted anywhere else.

For years, his beat has been dreadfully boring stuff like ~optimising your performance for success in business~, and you should know that thematically he's currently mid-villian's journey, pivoting his content from ~here's how Europe can be a leader in sustainable transport~ to ~here's how we can use GenAI for literally fucking everything.~

His comment section is dozens of fintech reply guys engaging earnestly with his productivity tips and totally missing the POINT. The point being: 

breadcrumbs about his relationship with his dad (keke rosberg) and also his relationship with his dad (toto wolff), which are both totally normal you guys thanks for asking 

a surprising number of performative meditation photos, very important in order to prove why neuroscientists have given him such a good grade in brain activity

the sanitised-to-fit-the-current-brand, darkness-still-lurking-within brocedes of it all, which is usually something like: "during my @ Formula1 days, lewis brought out the most evil, self-loathing version of me on account of how perfect he was, which made me miserable, but thankfully also led me to a deep wealth of venture capitalist wisdom 10-15 years later!!!"

cheery framing of the most fucked-up psychological damage wrought upon man by professional sports and reinforced by the sexy, evil father figures in charge

I also need you to know that Nico is unintentionally HILARIOUS. He isn’t setting out to be funny. He’s earnestly trying to be insightful/inspiring. For him it IS that deep, it’s the most serious thing in the world whether your mindset is primed to extract max performance from your douchey job. But oh my god does he wind up being funny.

Like, ok, how about illustrating a list of really obvious advice about bettersleep4betterresults with this selfie... conveying through eyebrow acting how unsatisfying his previous REM cycle was due to not following his own advice :(

Or a 40th birthday roundup of bland life lessons like 'great teamwork beats talent alone!' that obviously must be illustrated via slurping a vat of celery juice against decorative wallpaper (he likes this photo btw as it shows up in more than one post):

Or my personal favourite: his interpretation of the cliche advice that your business plan should be concise enough to fit on a napkin. Ah yes, I should have a napkin around here somewhere. Not a poor person's paper cocktail napkin, but how about this giant piece of nice fabric, which might actually be a pillowcase or perhaps a tablecloth? Surely it's fine to sharpie all over this and then throw it out? And definitely this exercise is about writing teeny tiny on an A4-sized surface so you can fit in as much as possible? Anyway, let's finish with a <3!

I also love when he experiments with style, like this brief foray into notes-app insights (didn't perform well, never tried again):

The wording of his posts is a dialect of its own, which has invaded my brain. He describes 1-3 things as “super” in every post, and it’s unclear whether he is aware of other adjectives. He overuses exclamation marks and emojis. Most posts contain a simple message illustrated via an extremely tenuous link to an F1 anecdote, and he is tagging the official @ Formula1 LinkedIn page at even the slightest opportunity. Someone once gave him the tip to ask a question to drive engagement, and he’s made that tip his religion. 

Once you start narrating your own life as a Nico LinkedIn post, it’s super hard to stop! It’s super fun, like winning a @Formula1 Grand Prix, which Nico did on 23 memorable occasions. 🏆 What’s a vocal tic you’ve adopted from a girldad entrepreneur in his 40s? 🤔 Let me know in the comments! 

Despite all this, Nico has kinda won me over? He is cringe and he is free and he’s so himself. There’s some really sweet tidbits in there when you go digging!!! 

He posts surprisingly often about both gender equality and karaoke - usually at separate times, but on one memorable occasion, together!

He comes across as really, genuinely loving of his family, invested in quality time with them, and supportive of their interests and successes. Like this - getting his wife to repeat the confidence-building phrases from her own childen's book when she's anxious! I find this very sweet!

And while he expresses it as though his every thought has been fed through a machine that increases corporatespeak and cheuginess by 175%, I have come to believe that he has genuinely self-actualised after retiring from the F1 torture machine, at least to the extent that he is trying to spend his one, wild, and precious life in a way that's authentic and meaningful to him.

I'll leave you with the one post so baffling it haunts me. The text is pretty innocuous and filled with his usual stuff: I love my family! Family time is more important than work! And luckily, family time will make you even better at work!

But ohhhhh my god the picture.

what on EARTH am I looking at here????? This monstrous creature has to be AI. Am I to believe that Nico and his young child have constructed a snow rabbit as tall as a pine tree???? with cartoon features not resembling any household objects one might use for a snowman face, questionable texture and colour gradients, and perfectly shaped (those paws!!) to an unlikely degree. This couldn't possibly be real snow???? And did he think we just wouldn't notice???? I have reverse image searched to compare it to real snow bunnies made by real human people and like... nico.... who are you trying to fool here...

The comments are equally insane work, like SIMPLE CRAFTS??? Are there LinkedIn bots? Surely these are not serious people.

And who I can only imagine to be the few fellow truthers... have been ominously ignored.

So like... has he made the entire story up? Has he 'built' the snowman on ChatGPT with his daughter, entirely undermining his put-down-your-phone thesis? Did he make a snowman but he was so ashamed by it that he felt the need to spruce it up in post? It's just such a bizarre thing to lie about... like... nobody was saying Nico, Nico, we simply must see the quality of the easter bunny snow sculpture you made with your children, without it we couldn't possibly take your word that enjoying simple moments with your family is a critical element of health, happiness, and productivity!

I'm not stupid, so I know there is a chance that every single post is written by GenAI and I have been duped into character analysis that is actually based on drivel written by a water guzzling soulless machine trained on self-help books. (Although I'll say that his style has remained pretty consistent for years, since before this would have been likely.)

He might also have never had the password to his own accounts, and this is the work of a social media girlie who texts him stuff like 'hey boss, when you get a sec could you pose with some green juice for me, and then maybe a second one looking really upset in bed?'

Or........ and maybe I am deluded by the unlikely degree of charming and fun I find him, but I do genuinely think there is just enough weird human decision-making here to indicate that this is the case..... is Nico typing out the earnest inner workings of his heart between networking happy hour and trackside commentary gigs and gruelling sessions with his philosopher-slash-psychotherapist-slash-mindset coach?

Regardless, like Nico I believe in the lifechanging power of gratitude, so uhhhhh. Thanks for posting the funniest content on the whole website, you corny, corny man!!

and then, another!!

there's so much to say about all of this and I don't have the time to get into everything but. what the fuck.

some of the drivers she's pointing out here as devout catholics weren't even devout catholics in the first place, and being catholic on paper doesn't mean that they lived or live catholic values or whatever. (pointing out senna who was with a 15 year old girl when he was 25 years old? bringing up perez who literally cheats on his wife?)

and that slide about fashion in f1 is particularly funny to me because what do you mean them being covered head to toe by the race suit is something you love to see compared to other athletes in "minimal clothing"? I fear she's implying that the race suits that are literally keeping them from burning alive should their cars go up in flames can be considered catholicism-approved 'modest clothes'? never thought I'd see the day where someone would argue that highly specialised safety equipment is something inherently catholic but here we are. (on this topic, she also made a post on being shocked to find a guy wearing a budweiser tshirt in her church recently so. modest clothes seem to be an important topic for her.) (on the topic of the drivers being so very modest in comparison to other athletes, what might she say about 'eat pussy it's vegan' lando or the o69p number plate oscar's picked or pierre being a 🐶 type of guy rather than a missionary type of guy or pierre suggesting the drivers have an orgy at the monaco gp afterparty or pierre - *gets sniped*)

apparently not aware of the contradiction, after implying that the drivers dress modestly, she says that "the women dress up and do it beautifully", and are "so classy". someone should tell her that most of the wags wear popular nouvelle riche luxury fashion because they're attending elite sporting events with major sponsorships for media attention, and I think she confuses dressing "classy" with the crazy insane elitism inherent to the sport.

the way she then points out that f1 culture hits different for catholic fans is also a bit funny to me: "family first" (meanwhile toto is treating george like something he found in the trash after almost ten years of george's loyalty but okay), "discipline over everything", "suffering for something you love", "community that feels like family" - f1 is fucking ruthless (as devout catholic pierre gasly would say, who the fia wanted dead because he was one of the drivers who made personal/political/religious statements by kneeling in front of his car to do the sign of the cross every weekend when they tried to ban such statements in 2023) and it's a high performance industry and the levels of projection in the catholic/f1 posts definitely cross over into parasocial territory which I think is hilarious considering the callout post about parasocial f1 fans she made less than one day ago.

the worst bit in the posts though is about the cultural foundations of the sport, about how it's a predominantly european sport, where "catholicism isn't just practised, it's woven into the entire architeture, the holidays, the entire culture. these drivers didn't grow up adjacent to faith, they grew up inside of it." she says that it originated in "places where catholicism isn't just a religion, it's the foundation of the entire culture. these drivers weren't just raised around faith, they were raised inside of it." (what in the chatgpt?)

in both posts, she lists italy, spain, monaco, and france. (let's ignore the fact that in the second post she also lists brazil, because brazil is not in europe) (and let's not mention that f1's heart is in britain and that the beginnings of f1 are intertwined with post ww2 england which is not a catholic country) (and the fact that germany's automotive industry hugely impacted motor racing after it directly benefited from national socialism and forced labour) (but okay. moving on.)

it would be nice if instead of cherry-picking and projecting her faith like this, she would have actually pointed out why it is that f1 originated in europe, had most of it's teams based in europe, and had about two thirds of all drivers come from europe. spoiler!! it's not got that much to do with catholicism!! (other than that the catholic church supported and benefited off all of the following.)

not to go completely off topic right now, but. maybe we should talk about industrial capitalism and where the capital was located and why the capital was located in western europe in the early 20th century when motor racing started. and maybe we should talk about the elite social networks of privileged european men who could actually afford cars in the early stages of motor racing. and about where automotive manufacturing was based and why that was the case and where the needed materials came from and who was exploited for them and for how long. maybe we should talk about the road infrastructure needed to even race in the early years and about who built those roads. maybe we should then talk about where the elite universities were based that gave the engineers the expertise they needed and why they happened to be in europe. maybe we should talk about the fact that the european technological dominance wasn't created in a vacuum but that it directly benefited from colonial wealth, colonial trade networks, and colonial exploitation for raw materials needed in motor racing.

(but that's another post, probably.) (or maybe a paper, one day.)

mostly, I think she mistakes social class stuff for religion and cherry picks 'evidence' for catholicism in f1 where it suits her argument and I think it's a bit funny. but also I'm soso serious about it.