Actually thereâs probably lots of cops in sight. Theyâre likely the ones holding the AR-15s.
macklin celebrini has autism

Origami Around
DEAR READER
Jules of Nature
Show & Tell
NASA
ojovivo
Cosimo Galluzzi

Discoholic đŞŠ
𩵠avery cochrane đŠľ
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

titsay
Sade Olutola
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
will byers stan first human second
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă


JVL
trying on a metaphor

Product Placement

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from South Korea

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from South Africa
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia

seen from Australia
seen from Israel
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
@captaintranssexual
Actually thereâs probably lots of cops in sight. Theyâre likely the ones holding the AR-15s.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Honestly I'd bet a lot of tucutes and transmeds have the same opinions just worded differently. Most transmeds just include gender incongruence in their definition of gender dysphoria.
That's the god damn problem? Gender incongruence and gender dysphoria are two completely different phenomena, experiencing gender dysphoria requires having gender incongruence while gender incongruence doesn't require having gender dysphoria, in short gender incongruence is the cause of gender dysphoria, that's an anti-science statement.
you can't just walk around saying having a low level of serotonin and depression are the same thing while expecting no backlash.
And the fact that y'all still shit on and bully non-dysphoric people stands between you and making this argument in good-faith, even if that statement was scientifically true.
I donât necessarily agree with it either but for some thatâs the only difference between them. And bullying absolutely occurs on both sides, donât get me wrong.
Honestly I'd bet a lot of tucutes and transmeds have the same opinions just worded differently. Most transmeds just include gender incongruence in their definition of gender dysphoria.
are you ever just,, fucking amazed that very things are actually discourse??
â lesbians are women
â objects are not genders
â preferences are not sexualities
â pedophilia is a mental illness not a sexuality
â intersex is a medical disorder
â asexuals do not feel sexual attraction
like these things,, are just facts?? what bizarro timeline have we entered where this shit isnât just?? universally understood??
You were so close until you acted like nb lesbians donât exist đ¤Ąđ¤Ş
Guess Iâm not a lesbian, can I have some privilege now?
fr i donât get why every enbygirl on this post thinks that iâm trying to invalidate them, specifically. pal, i donât know your life. all i know is that if you are a lesbian, you should accept the fact that you are a woman, and you if you are not a woman, you should accept the fact that you are not a lesbian.
are you a lesbian? or are you speaking over those of us that ARE in the community?
This, my friends is called circular reasoning. âIâm an enby lesbianâ âIâm not a woman but am a lesbianâ âonly lesbians can speak on thisâ âyou canât speak on this because youâre not a lesbianâ âI can speak because Iâm a lesbian because I said I amâ âtherefore I get to decide on this topicâ âso as a lesbian I declare that I am, and also that Iâm not a womanâ âtherefore nbs can be lesbiansâ.
Instead of actually explaining, they said âI am because i say I amâ thatâs one of the least valuable inputs you can make to an argument. Seriously. âLesbians get to decide this and I say Iâm one so I get to decide thisâ
You say a lot of words that make zero sense
Thatâs kind of the point. If itâs broken down like that and you canât follow it, thatâs because the original statement was flawed in the first place. Thatâs the whole point of it being a fallacy. Sounds nice but when broken down, itâs a giant mess of flaws, assumptions, bias, and illogical statements.
baffling how much of this site is just conservative protestantism with a gay hat
you know what iâm in just enough of a bad mood that iâm ready to nail my grievances to the church door so letâs fucking go
black and white morality wherein anyone who doesnât believe/think/live exactly as I do is a dirty sinner Problematic and probably a predatory monster
everyone is a sinner Problematic but true believers people who activist the right way according to my worldview are still better than everyone else, and I will act in accordance to this belief in my own superiority to let everyone else know Iâm better than them because I found Jesus am the most woke
casual and fucking omnipresent equations of womanhood with softness/goodness/purity/nurturing to remind every woman who isnât/doesnât want to be any of those things that theyâre doing it wrong
aggressive desexualization (particularly of womenâs sexuality, to the point where it may as well not exist at all) accompanied by pastels [not a criticism directed ace ppl having a right to sex-free content and spaces but specifically targeted at a wider problem resulting from the previous point]
YOUâRE VALID AND JESUS LOVES YOU and neither of these platitudes achieves a goddamn thing
historical context is for people who care about nuance and we donât have time for either (see: black and white morality)
lots of slogans and quotes and nice little soundbites to memorize but does anybody actually study the source material with a critical eye to make their own informed analysis
the answer is no
Iâve been to bible study groups donât @ me I know what the fuck Iâm talking about
Good Christians⢠Nice Gays⢠donât fraternize with/let themselves be influenced by non-Christians those terrible queers
all the media one consumes must be ideologically pure or it will surely harm the children
it is Our Sacred Duty to protect the children from Everything, thus ensuring their innocence/purity/etc until such time as they are idk probably 25 years old
literally just âthink of the childrenâ moral panic yâall can fuckin miss me with that
people who donât conform to the dominant thinking WILL be excommunicated/driven from the social group, and any wrong treatment they suffer will be seen as a justified consequence of their wrong thinking
I Saw Goody Proctor With The Devil And She Had A Bad Steven Universe Headcanon
Thank you for breaking it down like that because so many of us have been saying it but to see a play by play breakdown comparison is justâŚThank you.
sipping tea and judging people as a group bonding activity
oh, man, speaking as a queer Christian who gets regular tumblr flashbacks to my childhood in the Bible Belt, YES
-belief that small snippets of text can be analyzed out context to understand the whole work/ judge the whole person -Desire for moral choices to be easy/ black-and-white leads to belief that it is possible to find a one-size-fits all answer to every situation -Literal, rather than literary analysis, with weird fixation on etymological roots that have nothing to do with source material -Belief that there is âone true interpretationâ that is self-evident and will be understood by everyone encountering the same material regardless of background -Overwhelming, internalized sense of culpability for other peopleâs actions/integrity/souls -Overwhelming, internalized sense of personal guilt -Pressure to evangelize aggressively -Tendency to value broad ideals before individual needs -Hostility towards coexistence/tolerance/neutrality -Hostility towards lack of consensus in viewpoint -Knowledge as contamination -Guilt/contamination by proximity -Fixation on the sexual as uniquely dirty/sinful -Belief in âthought crimesâ -Argumentation via appeal to higher authority/feelings of revulsion rather than internal, verbalizeable logic -âconversationsâ that are actually stealth soapboxes because one side isnât actually interested in listening -âpolite requestsâ that are actually commands because ânoâ is not considered an acceptable answer -in-group language -virtue-signaling and hostility towards the outgroup -gatekeeping -communities strongly built around the idea of being the worldâs underdog -appropriation of other peopleâs persecution/victimization -treating the concept of oppression like a trophy -glorification/fetishization of victimhood
It got better.
Bringing this back.
Hereâs a few more!
Heretical Problematic language will not be tolerated and will only be seen from one perspective! Because my point of view is the only right one!
Who cares if it was a joke? I didnât find it funny so ITâS NOT! thatâs gonna be a yikes from me, fam.
A firm belief that they are superior moral authority even among people they consider close friends.
Unyielding belief that change is an event, not a process.
Sinners (insert your chosen kind of â-istsâ) shouldnât have a chance to redeem themselves, just donât sin be problematic lmao.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Block lists and mass blocking creates echo-chambers.
Itâs kind of ironic seeing people accusing others of taking part in an echo-chamber but go around blocking everyone that disagrees with them.
Of course if youâre not into discourse and politics, do what you want, but if youâre actively putting out your opinions, but blocking everyone who may disagree or try to give you a different opinion, youâre blocking one more person from accessing this information you think is so valuable or correct. Youâre also blocking opinions of others which in turn creates your own echo-chamber.
The more a name appears on a blocklist, the more that person will be secluded to only a small group of people with a small set of opinions. If every tucute blocks every transmed, they will absolutely yâall amongst themselves. Youâre not blocking their platform, only narrowing their view of the world. If you want to make change, consider opening yourself to others a little bit. You will never change a mind that you have placed behind a wall. And they likely arenât going to change their view if youâre always keeping them on the outside.
Obviously this is not exclusive to tucutes. And if someone is actually harassing you, you have the right to get away from that. But also having another opinion, having a debate, or someone criticizing you or your view is not harassment. If youâre not willing to listen to others, nobody needs to listen to you. Youâre not an authority, you donât possess an absolute truth, youâre not on the âright sideâ of every opinion. Better yourself and learn to listen. You canât argue something successfully if you donât understand the side youâre arguing against. If you think you know them without civilly talking to them, you absolutely need a reality check, you may be in an echo-chamber already.
Stop using suicide statistics to gaslight people.
Thatâs all.
If you belong to a certain tumblr discourse group and you notice that group propagating things that research does not support. You should speak up.
Studies have shown that people are conformists. Even when it goes against their own knowledge. Even if it goes against a clear truth. Against scientific research and evidence. Doesnât matter what group, if you have misinformed people in it leading discussions, youâll always have people dropping their own critical thinking, in favor of being liked. Delivery of information from another person is stronger than ones own discovery of information. Just an unfortunate truth. But you can become aware of that and learn to be critical of the self and of the group you belong to.
Groups will inevitably become misinformation machines because groups are social structures and people are social creatures. Claims with no evidence and no explanation are often just opinions, not facts. If your group favors the narrative of âyouâre wrong and thatâs the endâ you should really reassess what it is that you stand for.
Leave groups that favor political opinions over science. Thatâs simply just a group of people who look solely for evidence supporting their positions, not forming their opinions on tangible data. Thatâs dishonest.
Tucutes, you do this. Transmeds, you do this (not usually as often though). Radfems, you do this. Liberals, you do this. Conservatives, you do this.
Be your own person. Not having a group to belong to on the internet is not going to hurt you. It may even make you a better person. Your social fulfillment should not come from trying to insult people on the internet because theyâre not âone of youâ. People get social fulfillment online, loneliness depression can lessen. That may lead one to say that the loniler people may be spending more time online as a means of offering relief. Thatâs not necessarily a good thing when groups are fueled heavily by toxic politics in which one may lose their means of socialization and relief from loneliness if they stray from group narratives.
This absolutely offers incentive to strengthen the narrative of the group to increase social standing and that may mean dishonestly producing cherry-picked information from heavily biased âsourcesâ because it may agree with a misleading or misinformed opinion. And if one canât do that, blocking out criticism (because many of the people looking for fulfillment online are more sensitive to criticism) and simply turning away outside information: â*These* people are wrongâ put into a visually pleasing art piece with no explanation or information to support the statement, accompanied by tags drawing other members of the group and deterring members of opposing groups i.e. âdni tagsâ.
In conclusion: your blog and social standing online means little to nothing and you need to stop taking everything to heart. Criticism isnât a personal attack. Do your own research. Be critical of the information given to you, even by your own peers, and perhaps especially by your own peers. Seek social fulfillment offline.
Saying something vague but asinine and then being an absolute shithead when someone responds negatively because âyouâre stupid I obviously meant it this wayâ is a form of gaslighting and yâall need to stop doing that.
I get that everyoneâs afraid of being wrong because being wrong can get you ostracized nowadays, but seriously just have your opinions and stick to them. Donât make a statement and then completely change it when someone calls out a flaw and act like you were perfectly right the whole time. Say what you mean and if you really believe it, defend it. If you donât really believe it then why tf are you saying it in the first place other than to be confrontational??
âThe sky is blackâ
âitâs blueâ
âwell space is black and thatâs still the sky. I never meant the color of our perception through the atmosphere. You must be stupid to not know that.â
(Not a real example, but Iâm sure youâve all seen it).
Nothing edgier than an âex-transmedâ
We get it, you want to always be against the popular movement. You wanna be a new brand of hipster. âOh I used to be a transmed back when it first began, but the new wave is disgustingâ. Back when? 2015??
You wanted to be a transmed because it was âdistastefulâ and you could go unchecked and make it what you wanted. But now that more people hopped on and youâre not as relevant as a âfounding memberâ as you thought youâd be, you got mad and stormed out. What were you in it for then? Just wanted to be a dick? Weâre you in it to be one of the few and make yourself important in the community? Wanted to do it back when it was edgy, but now itâs too popular? Realize you didnât actually have dysphoria and didnât want to be pushing something that would push yourself out?
One more thing, that doesnât make you superior to any other person here, and itâs not something that gives you any credibility to what you have to say. Most of yâall end up as tucute-lites anyways đ.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Some of you really just want to have enemies
Most of you seem to forget to think critically about things anymore. Nobodyâs having discussions with anyone outside of the groups they already agree with. You all just want to sit in your safe little boxes and criticize eachother. Giving all these labels to others is doing nothing but promote stereotypes and prevent others from trying to communicate outside your boxes. Other people have plenty of valuable opinions and insight but are too afraid to talk to those people and be ostracized.
Stop making posts like: âwe all know the real enemy is (blank)â. We are all trying to make the world better and safer for everyone, you just want someone to fight. Always want to make someone else the bad guy. Well sorry but you arenât a soldier, you arenât in battle, and there is no war. Just talk to people you disagree with. Try to see where theyâre coming from. You will never dissolve a misconception or misunderstanding with aggression and antagonistic rhetoric. Most of you only have small ideological differences but would never even know because youâre too busy judging people by a label you gave them.
If youâre not going to listen, then stay silent.
Iâm absolutely tired of seeing transmeds call out tucutes for the same shit they do and vice versa.
Both of you are just reciting shit you heard other people say. Educate yourselves. All of you.