the generational gap between me and the people my age who were allowed to watch spongebob

hello vonnie
tumblr dot com
d e v o n
noise dept.
we're not kids anymore.
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
EXPECTATIONS

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

PR's Tumblrdome
taylor price
ojovivo
todays bird

macklin celebrini has autism
One Nice Bug Per Day

oozey mess
RMH

shark vs the universe
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from France
@autopoion
the generational gap between me and the people my age who were allowed to watch spongebob

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
re: adaptation and the supposed âpurityâ of the original work itâs complicated right. and ultimately I think that whether classicists like it or not, itâs just the nature of the beast that (a) the texts we study have been and continue to be radically readapted and reinterpreted and we can have strong opinions about which adaptations we like or donât but itâs just the nature of a 2000+ year reception tradition to produce variance, and (b) the texts we study are much more a scholarly construction, and authorial intent far more difficult (and ideologically suspect) to try to recover, than is true of, say, a 19th or 20th century novel. which is to say that itâs one thing to say that Fennellâs Wuthering Heights misunderstands Charlotte Bronteâs novel and something quite different to say that Nolanâs Odyssey misunderstands âHomerâsâ epic, because the latter is responding to another 2500 years of a reception tradition that in some sense is not entirely or even primarily about the Odyssey as a poem in Ancient Greek. this is not to take a stand on either one as an ideological project or whether either is a good film (I am reserving judgment but strongly suspect that neither is) but to say that I think that whatever the Odyssey is on a conceptual level is much less singular and well-defined than what Wuthering Heights is, if that makes sense
basically what Iâm getting at here is that âHomerâ or âthe classicalâ is not a real, tangible, solid thing out there in the world that can only ever be correctly or incorrectly interpreted. itâs an ongoing process of cultural conversation and production and assignment of value judgments that operates across thousands of years of accreted meaning, and the impulse to see an adaptation or interpretation you donât like for ideological or aesthetic reasons and immediately claim that itâs a misinterpretation of the Original Text is a kind of rhetorical dodge
do people just not find those AI pop-ups everywhere not incredibly patronizing: "help me write" "help me visualize" help me put my balls in your mouth
No bond stronger than a disabled girl and her disabled cat
having chronic pain is just like. ur sitting perfectly still doing nothing meanwhile the space above your head keeps flashing -1hp -1hp -1hp -1hp -1hp -1hp -1hp -1hp -1hp -1hp

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
When it comes to chronic illnesses, mental illnesses, and disabilities, I've noticed that a lot of able-bodied people either don't take names seriously, or don't understand and ask you to explain what it is to them.
Now, if you have any kind of disability, you know it's fucking annoying go have people make you explain something over and over again, or have people go "oh, you have X? You mean, like the [awful stereotype] thing?"
So, I have realized recently that being Vague As Shit is great for making people leave you the hell alone.
I have autism and anxiety, and with that comes the symptom of selective mutism. If you don't know what that is, Firefox is free. But I had an episode where I couldn't speak today in one of my classes, and knew I would have to explain it to my partner and probably my professor.
This usually goes with me writing that I can't speak, them asking why, me saying selective mutism, and them asking me what that is. Then I have to painstakingly write out an explanation. And, obviously, I'm tired of this. So I tried something new. When he asked, I simply told him I couldn't speak, and when he asked if I physically couldn't or just didn't want to, I just opened my mouth and unleashed the terrifying, awful, broken stuttering that comes out when I try to speak while mute.
His response was "OKAY OKAY OKAY YOU CAN STOP NOW" and he did not question me for the rest of class, and even explained to the professor what was wrong when she tried to make me popcorn read.
This also works on doctors. When I tell doctors I have PCOS, POTS, or hEDS, they usually hear "oh the crazy women self diagnosis disabilities" and treat me accordingly. So, instead I drop unhinged symptoms until they leave me alone.
"Yes, my last menstrual cycle started on December 12th, 2025 and ended January 28th, 2026." "I have experienced several events where I have passed out randomly, yes." "My hip has subluxated six times in the past week."
It's like in the principles of writing horror. If you name and describe the problem, it's easier for people to minimize and ignore. Don't let them. You live with this fucking bullshit every day. Let your symptoms haunt people. They don't need to know everything about you. Besides, it makes them treat you better than when you give them names.
positive image: a portrait of gay america (1985) by stephen stewart
the problem is i really do love staying up until one billion o'clock. it just cant be helped
once I snorted a fat line of nuance and everything started depending. watch out
it's crazy how february-june didn't happen

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
currently thinking about how decreasing literacy rates (especially media literacy) are coinciding with an inability to distinguish knowing about a story from reading a story. which i guess comes naturally with ai summarizing everything - just the essentials! - and the inane discourse about whatâs ânot necessaryâ in a piece of media (eg sex, mundanity).
but i am actually going to die on the hill that a story is not (only) its plot. itâs not a distillable sequence of events characters and themes that fits into a paragraph. a story - a narrative - is an experience, one in which the reader can choose to spend as much or as little time as they wish. a story is cocreated at the moment of reading by the reader and the text, mostly (yes there are obviously other variables). if you donât read the story you havenât read the story. which feels like a wild thing to clarify, but i probably shouldâve seen this coming.
do you know what happens? sure. thatâs the plot. thatâs information about the story.
do you know how it happens? maybe. if you read the story. you could also learn this from consuming information about the story.
do you know how the story made you feel and think, and how it will impact your awareness of the world around you? how it is now shaping your story? only if youâve read the story. if you know how a plot summary made you feel, then you know the above questions *for the story of the plot summary*. do you see what iâm saying?
a story is not infinitely reducible. a story is greater than the sum of its parts. and a story requires investment from a reader in order to fully become a story. some folks like know about stories, and thatâs fine. some folks like reading stories, which is also fine, and different from knowing about stories.
(this is shaped by watching odyssey discourse pass by me in the night. respectfully, knowing about the odyssey is not the same as reading it. you can do both. one frequently begets the other. but they are not the same)
the problem marxists have on disability is that they aren't reading marxist thought on disability and just kind of winging it. marta russell already laid out the political economy of disability in the global north in the 90s and global south scholars have their own (marxist) schools of thought on disability and have iterated on global north marxist disability analyses. disabled people are workers, most often. and handicapitalism (russell's term) has also turned disabled people into commodities. it's impossible to understand modern politics without engaging with these two realities.
everyone read right to maim and capitalism and disability now !!!!!!
pdf of capitalism and disability
pdf of right to maim
several asks in my inbox about the nolan odyssey now that it's out so i will make my One Obligatory Post and so that i can be free to pass through the gate of false dreams and never think about it again
personally i have stopped caring about the movie itself in terms of whether it's a "good" version of the odyssey. there are things i have heard about it that i think are kind of dumb choices to make but i also like my odysseus to suck bigly and unrepentenly and tbh the version of odysseus in my head is not a very homeric one at all! it's more informed by things like the philoctetes and the aeneid because i personally find those depictions more interesting. there are also things i've heard that intrigue me but i refuse to pay money to see this movie
what i find is more important to focus on is the conversations about things like the treatment of shooting locations or the fucking iranian artifacts turned into jewlery for an american actress to wear while the us is actively waging war against iran. just as any ancient telling of odysseus's story, the nolan odyssey does not exist in a vacuum. i'm sure there are interesting things to analyze in the movie as a story but personally the issue that concerns me more is the analysis of this movie as a way for the classics to once again be interpreted and used by someone from a powerful colonizing nation for entertainment while actively appropriating aspects of other cultures. like it feels like heavy handed satire at this point except it's real. if we're going to give this movie critical attention i just think this is more important to think about than whether the movie is "good"
also i think the trojan horse looks dumb as hell and troy 2004 did a way better job at it. which is saying something.
(source) its so funny how actual Greek and Homeric scholars are talking about this movie vs the fact that people on tumblr are acting like Nolan personally dug up Homer's actual bones and pissed on them
I actually really dislike this framing of the whole thing.
This kind of assessment creates a false dichotomy of the Smart Reaction of Scholars and the Stupid Reaction of Hoi Polloi, when there are plenty of classical scholars (hi) who also very much dislike what Nolan has done with this text. My thoughts on the film are more aligned with the people bewailing the Nobody episode. Now not all those people have the toolbox I have for criticizing the film, and certainly some of them are being a bit myopic and histrionic about XYZ pet peeve, but that doesnât mean that theyâre seeing problems that arenât there. Iâm one of Martinâs fellow classicists, and I seriously disliked what this film was doing as an adaptation. Iâve had conversations with several of my colleagues whoâve seen the film and had similar thoughts to me. So putting it this way is at best an oversimplification, at worst insufferably smug and elitist.
And frankly, I think in this the year of our lord 2026, we can raise the bar higher than âAll publicity about Homer is good publicity.â For one, I think we should also ask whether engagement with Homer, or with any aspect of antiquity, is well thought out and well crafted, or at least has some interest in the original beyond the surfaceâwhich as I note in my review linked above, I donât think this is. And trust me, I know that Classics is kinda desperate for engagement right now and some professors are probably trying not to piss in anyoneâs cornflakes lest we lose potential students. But when guys like Christopher Nolan (not one of Martinâs fellow classicists, but one of his fellow old white men with cultural capital) just use antiquity to bemoan the broad decline of civilization, I think we should question that. The filmâs political resonances are weird and, to my mind at least, parrot a lot of conservative rhetoric. Nolanâs changes to the text are key to that; they are not neutral and have narrative and political implications. Regardless of whether or not he meant it to come off that way, I think itâs worth talking about, especially given the ways that classical antiquity, as supposed paragon of ~Western Civilization~, is utilized on the political right.
âit isnt something you have to read criticallyâ well đ
this technically is true but I think this also perfectly encapsulates why I am inherently distrustful of like. ââcozyââ âturn your brain offâ fiction lmfao. like okay WHO gets to turn their brain off and who has to suffer through bigoted caricatures of themselves while everyone else is having cozy silly no brain time đ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
which of these classical texts have you read?
the iliad, the odyssey, and the aeneid
the iliad and the odyssey, not the aeneid
the iliad only
the odyssey only
the aeneid only
the aeneid and the iliad, not the odyssey
the aeneid and the odyssey, not the iliad
I have read none of these
"what if I've read part of it" if it's a large enough part that you would consider yourself to Have Read It in general contexts, then it counts. if it's not, then it doesn't. only you can be the judge of that, but I'm not giving you a nuance button.
any translations count, but abridged retellings don't
obviously, there are lots of other classical texts out there. you might have read none of these and be an expert on greek tragedy. I'm not judging your classical knowledge so you don't need to tell me all that. I'm just curious about combos of these specific texts and their popularity, bc a post i just saw got me thinking about it
sorry if all of my posts have a vaguely sadomasochist undertone to them. itâs because iâm a sadomasochist