once I snorted a fat line of nuance and everything started depending. watch out
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Show & Tell
Claire Keane

tannertan36
trying on a metaphor

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
sheepfilms

PR's Tumblrdome
The Bowery Presents
we're not kids anymore.

bliss lane

blake kathryn
Jules of Nature

pixel skylines
ojovivo
Game of Thrones Daily
Noah Kahan

seen from Costa Rica
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from India
seen from Bolivia

seen from Colombia
seen from Brazil

seen from Canada
seen from Philippines
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
@autopoion
once I snorted a fat line of nuance and everything started depending. watch out

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
it's crazy how february-june didn't happen
currently thinking about how decreasing literacy rates (especially media literacy) are coinciding with an inability to distinguish knowing about a story from reading a story. which i guess comes naturally with ai summarizing everything - just the essentials! - and the inane discourse about what’s “not necessary” in a piece of media (eg sex, mundanity).
but i am actually going to die on the hill that a story is not (only) its plot. it’s not a distillable sequence of events characters and themes that fits into a paragraph. a story - a narrative - is an experience, one in which the reader can choose to spend as much or as little time as they wish. a story is cocreated at the moment of reading by the reader and the text, mostly (yes there are obviously other variables). if you don’t read the story you haven’t read the story. which feels like a wild thing to clarify, but i probably should’ve seen this coming.
do you know what happens? sure. that’s the plot. that’s information about the story.
do you know how it happens? maybe. if you read the story. you could also learn this from consuming information about the story.
do you know how the story made you feel and think, and how it will impact your awareness of the world around you? how it is now shaping your story? only if you’ve read the story. if you know how a plot summary made you feel, then you know the above questions *for the story of the plot summary*. do you see what i’m saying?
a story is not infinitely reducible. a story is greater than the sum of its parts. and a story requires investment from a reader in order to fully become a story. some folks like know about stories, and that’s fine. some folks like reading stories, which is also fine, and different from knowing about stories.
(this is shaped by watching odyssey discourse pass by me in the night. respectfully, knowing about the odyssey is not the same as reading it. you can do both. one frequently begets the other. but they are not the same)
the problem marxists have on disability is that they aren't reading marxist thought on disability and just kind of winging it. marta russell already laid out the political economy of disability in the global north in the 90s and global south scholars have their own (marxist) schools of thought on disability and have iterated on global north marxist disability analyses. disabled people are workers, most often. and handicapitalism (russell's term) has also turned disabled people into commodities. it's impossible to understand modern politics without engaging with these two realities.
everyone read right to maim and capitalism and disability now !!!!!!
pdf of capitalism and disability
pdf of right to maim
several asks in my inbox about the nolan odyssey now that it's out so i will make my One Obligatory Post and so that i can be free to pass through the gate of false dreams and never think about it again
personally i have stopped caring about the movie itself in terms of whether it's a "good" version of the odyssey. there are things i have heard about it that i think are kind of dumb choices to make but i also like my odysseus to suck bigly and unrepentenly and tbh the version of odysseus in my head is not a very homeric one at all! it's more informed by things like the philoctetes and the aeneid because i personally find those depictions more interesting. there are also things i've heard that intrigue me but i refuse to pay money to see this movie
what i find is more important to focus on is the conversations about things like the treatment of shooting locations or the fucking iranian artifacts turned into jewlery for an american actress to wear while the us is actively waging war against iran. just as any ancient telling of odysseus's story, the nolan odyssey does not exist in a vacuum. i'm sure there are interesting things to analyze in the movie as a story but personally the issue that concerns me more is the analysis of this movie as a way for the classics to once again be interpreted and used by someone from a powerful colonizing nation for entertainment while actively appropriating aspects of other cultures. like it feels like heavy handed satire at this point except it's real. if we're going to give this movie critical attention i just think this is more important to think about than whether the movie is "good"
also i think the trojan horse looks dumb as hell and troy 2004 did a way better job at it. which is saying something.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
(source) its so funny how actual Greek and Homeric scholars are talking about this movie vs the fact that people on tumblr are acting like Nolan personally dug up Homer's actual bones and pissed on them
I actually really dislike this framing of the whole thing.
This kind of assessment creates a false dichotomy of the Smart Reaction of Scholars and the Stupid Reaction of Hoi Polloi, when there are plenty of classical scholars (hi) who also very much dislike what Nolan has done with this text. My thoughts on the film are more aligned with the people bewailing the Nobody episode. Now not all those people have the toolbox I have for criticizing the film, and certainly some of them are being a bit myopic and histrionic about XYZ pet peeve, but that doesn’t mean that they’re seeing problems that aren’t there. I’m one of Martin’s fellow classicists, and I seriously disliked what this film was doing as an adaptation. I’ve had conversations with several of my colleagues who’ve seen the film and had similar thoughts to me. So putting it this way is at best an oversimplification, at worst insufferably smug and elitist.
And frankly, I think in this the year of our lord 2026, we can raise the bar higher than “All publicity about Homer is good publicity.” For one, I think we should also ask whether engagement with Homer, or with any aspect of antiquity, is well thought out and well crafted, or at least has some interest in the original beyond the surface—which as I note in my review linked above, I don’t think this is. And trust me, I know that Classics is kinda desperate for engagement right now and some professors are probably trying not to piss in anyone’s cornflakes lest we lose potential students. But when guys like Christopher Nolan (not one of Martin’s fellow classicists, but one of his fellow old white men with cultural capital) just use antiquity to bemoan the broad decline of civilization, I think we should question that. The film’s political resonances are weird and, to my mind at least, parrot a lot of conservative rhetoric. Nolan’s changes to the text are key to that; they are not neutral and have narrative and political implications. Regardless of whether or not he meant it to come off that way, I think it’s worth talking about, especially given the ways that classical antiquity, as supposed paragon of ~Western Civilization~, is utilized on the political right.
“it isnt something you have to read critically” well 😭
this technically is true but I think this also perfectly encapsulates why I am inherently distrustful of like. “”cozy”” “turn your brain off” fiction lmfao. like okay WHO gets to turn their brain off and who has to suffer through bigoted caricatures of themselves while everyone else is having cozy silly no brain time 😐
which of these classical texts have you read?
the iliad, the odyssey, and the aeneid
the iliad and the odyssey, not the aeneid
the iliad only
the odyssey only
the aeneid only
the aeneid and the iliad, not the odyssey
the aeneid and the odyssey, not the iliad
I have read none of these
"what if I've read part of it" if it's a large enough part that you would consider yourself to Have Read It in general contexts, then it counts. if it's not, then it doesn't. only you can be the judge of that, but I'm not giving you a nuance button.
any translations count, but abridged retellings don't
obviously, there are lots of other classical texts out there. you might have read none of these and be an expert on greek tragedy. I'm not judging your classical knowledge so you don't need to tell me all that. I'm just curious about combos of these specific texts and their popularity, bc a post i just saw got me thinking about it
sorry if all of my posts have a vaguely sadomasochist undertone to them. it’s because i’m a sadomasochist
i’ve been feeling like a loser because well i’ve been engaging in loser behaviour and activities like not looking after myself

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
on one hand that "pseudohumanities" post infuriates me bc there is legitimately good analysis being produced #OnHere and I've seen it dismissed as pseudohumanities.
on the other hand I've seen viciously incorrect and ahistorical analysis made by folks getting 10s of thousands of notes because they said it with a tone of authority, so it's not like the pseudohumanities critique is unfounded lmao
tags courtesy of @postarcadian
yeah, exactly! and I wanna expand on this just a little. the "doing humanities in an informal para-academic setting" is something that one gets used to when they're in academia. There are posts on here that I read in the manner in which I treat the conversations had with phd candidates over coffee (weed or w/e vice of choice, i've certainly posted about my subjects of study while high), in that these conversations can be both highly informative and highly generative. I've had informal convos both irl and online turn into papers. While we aren't going to treat these conversations as the same level of authority as we might a peer reviewed paper or a book, we recognize that they can be genuinely productive scholarship. (Which is part of the fun of following other academics on here. Besides that so many of them are delightful, intelligent, and pleasant to be around; but im digressing)
But for someone without the experience, that difference between expertise and someone faking expertise is often not legible. And so we have some folks blithely spouting absolute nonsense that gets treated with the same or greater authority than folks who've spent 8 years in intensive study. And while I'm not yet 8 years along in my studies, I'm enough of an expert in some subjects to be occasionally pulling my hair out in the same way an astronomer will at youtube videos about black holes or in the same way epidemiologists have been driven bald since the start of 2020.
All of which is to say: Not all posts are good ones. And I know it's my job to teach people to read with their thinking caps on. But man I wish people knew how to read with their thinking caps on
on one hand that "pseudohumanities" post infuriates me bc there is legitimately good analysis being produced #OnHere and I've seen it dismissed as pseudohumanities.
on the other hand I've seen viciously incorrect and ahistorical analysis made by folks getting 10s of thousands of notes because they said it with a tone of authority, so it's not like the pseudohumanities critique is unfounded lmao
bouncing off of @an-ruraiocht’s Iliad/Odyssey/Aeneid poll I’m curious about some other ancient Greek and Roman texts
Which of the following Greek or Roman texts would you say you are most familiar with?
The Iliad (Homer)
The Odyssey (Homer)
The Aeneid (Vergil)
Antigone (Sophocles)
Oedipus Rex (Sophocles)
Medea (Euripides)
The Bacchae (Euripides)
Another Greek tragedy (tell me in the tags!)
Metamorphoses (Ovid)
Pharsalia/Bellum Civile (Lucan)
Thebaid (Statius)
Another Greek or Roman epic poem (tell me in the tags!)
btw I am not blaming anyone for this but do you know how bad at teaching most TAs are, and how little support they get at becoming better teachers? sooo much writing instruction is outsourced to people who have never been in front of a classroom before, and to people in the humanities who consider teaching in writing programs to be beneath them, btw. and some of them have been my colleagues and friends, and everyone has to start somewhere, but yeesh. everything’s tight right now but if some minor amount of money could be diverted from [various projects that make universities look good to donors but don’t contribute to teaching], so much could be done !
"There's millions of Tumblr users" to you. To me There's only about 12 and we all reblog the same five posts from each other

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Why do you blog?
Honor
Glory
Duty
Justice