Okay, since I know for certain this is about me, I am going to reply to this.
Do you recall that one Tumblr post about furry artists making more money than doctors, where the punchline is like "yeah, but you can't ask your doctor to draw you [some furry art]" and the reply is "you could if you weren't a coward".
Someone illustrated that post and it was whoever made the first post up on a stage like they were presenting something and the reblogs were people in the audience.
That is how I, and at least a few other people I'm sure, view Tumblr.
The problem here, is that the other way people view Tumblr is that their blogs are not public stages to them, they are some private safe space. Or shouting into the void or something.
Tumblr can seem both very populated and entirely empty at the same time. So these two viewpoints make sense.
I offered up a random thought on one of your posts because someone I follow reblogged it. Meaning it breached the containment of your safe space and it became a publicly shared statement.
I didn't go onto your blog and just find something you said to shit on. If I had then your comparison to me clinbing in your window might make a little more sense. I DID go onto your blog and stumbled upon this, because I decided to look into the person I had an awkward interaction with, but like... before that, no.
Also, while I can retroactively respect that you didn't want to have a conversation about your post, I feel like what I said had a point and wasn't a terrible opening to conversation?
You said you want to see more cheating storylines, I said because of my viewpoint I tend to find them boring because they focus on sex. That isn't me just shitting on something you like, that's a conversation opener. And like, heaven forbid I think a public post about something you're interested in might be a place where you want to talk about what you like about it?
Alright, I think I'm done. I said my piece.
Again, sorry for treating your post in a way incongruous with how you view your Tumblr Experience™.