supernaturallyblond â> arcadianico

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ

izzy's playlists!

Andulka

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

Product Placement
Show & Tell

bliss lane

tannertan36
Cosmic Funnies
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
$LAYYYTER
art blog(derogatory)
macklin celebrini has autism

ellievsbear
Claire Keane

oozey mess
One Nice Bug Per Day
Xuebing Du

Kiana Khansmith

seen from United States

seen from Philippines

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Russia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States

seen from China

seen from India

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from India
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
@arcadianico
supernaturallyblond â> arcadianico

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
TIL that in medieval times trebuchets were sometimes used during tournaments to bombard the watching ladies with roses, and there is something so inherently comedic about this to me. picture me blasting roses at my lover's window with the force of a battlefield assault to win her hand
@taciturn-nerd @beautifulscreaminglady I'm cackling
straight white people making a romance movie: haha what if it was illegal to have sex? wait what's lawrence v texas. wait what's mclaughlin v florida. wait what's loving v virginia
As preposterous and stupid as this fucking movie's premise sounded (for a light-hearted rom-com, and not The Handmaid's Tale) I didn't want to think about it too much until the movie actually came out, and then I could see if it was somehow more intelligent and subversive than the trailer let on, but guess what, it's even worse!
If this is what it takes to get a rom-com greenlit these days, maybe we should just let them die.
Sex workers are thrown under the bus, shown only as thieves who fleece men in the woods at night, while queer sexuality is relegated to a few scenes with Allieâs roommate (a woefully underused Quintessa Swindell) and a handful of pans past blurry same-sex extras making out in the background. âThis night is for the straights,â Swindellâs character says to Allie, before saying that queer people have worked around straight laws for centuries. This is supposed to be a nod to queer resilience, but largely comes off as straightwashing the history of anti-LGBTQ legislation in this country that led towards raids of queer clubs and incarceration of queer people in the not-too-distant past (let alone the current barrage of anti-Trans and LGBTQ legislation currently in the works and on the books). Itâs also ignorant of the long and fraught fight for the normalization of age-of-consent laws, which, by the way, did not happen in all states in this very country until 2003. Yes, thatâs not even thirty years ago. By the end, our intrepid protagonists have not had sex with anyone, because this is a film about Romance with a Capital R (and I guess sex is not part of romance!) and for that very same reason they ultimately embrace the fascist state of things. They arenât the only ones who refuse to fight back. No one in this cursed film is protesting this mandate beyond ârepealâ signs in various windows and some creative graffiti (...) (...) If we are supposed to believe that the film is making some subversive statement about the state of sex and bodily autonomy in this country, it cannot end with its leads embracing their chains. Thatâs just warmed-over conservatism running around in sheepâs clothing.
yeah i wrote this post having only seen the trailer, but jesus christ. was this movie a psyop LMAO??
also, for the unaware: mclaughlin v. florida was a 1964 supreme court case that struck down a florida anti-miscegenation law that criminalized cohabitation (and thus, as implied, sex) between white people and people of color of opposite genders. anti-miscegenation laws made marriage and sexual relationships between white people and people of color, most often specifically black people, a FELONY in several states in the united states up until the 1950s and 1960s. though it was already struck down by the supreme court, the state of alabama didn't repeal their law until 2000! there were THREE ATTEMPTS at codifying anti-miscegenation into the us constitution!
like yes, the issue here is partially straight white people's ignorance on the united states's history of homophobic policy, but it's also really important to recognize that arguably the majority of the issue here is straight white people's ignorance of the united states's history of codifying eugenics and antiblack racism.
the premise could have been interesting as a serious dystopian story, especially taking that history into account, but it wasn't written that way at all. this movie should never have been a fucking romcom making light of the violence the united states (and many other countries) has enacted on any kinds of sexual relationships it deems undesirable.
can yâall maybe reblog this version i feel like people are forgetting about the racism and just focusing on the homophobia
If you ever, and I mean EVER think that you fucked something up royally, remember that the organizers of the 1904 Olympic marathon:
- Had zero stations for water on the 26 mile (42 km) course
- Accidentally gave North American competitor Tom Hicks a cocktail made of egg whites, brandy, and actual fucking rat poison
- Had a guy come into the race late wearing a beret and cutoff slacks, sneak into an apple orchard during the race because no food had been given to him for 40 hours, eat rotten apples, projectile vomit onto the track, fall asleep for hours, and finish in fourth place OVERALL because most of the other runners collapsed of exhaustion or injuries
- Conducted the race on a dusty road, which caused so much dust to be kicked into the air that an American runner somehow inhaled enough to tear his STOMACH LINING open
- Accidentally released feral dogs onto the track
- Fucked the other competitors up SO BADLY that Tom Hicksâthe guy who ate RAT POISON and was HALLUCINATING the entire runâcame in first place

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
who up wasting their only shot at life through complete and utter inaction
this is NOT about not being productive, i cannot believe how many people in the notes are telling me that pursuing hobbies isn't a waste of time i KNOW that. what i mean by "complete and utter inaction" is doing nothing. not only am i not being productive or pursuing any goals, i'm also not doing any of the myriad things i know would bring me joy. i'm not doing hobbies, i'm not hanging out with friends, i'm just sitting around rotting away for no discernible reason
Watching any Shakespeare play for the first time is always fun because you get to find out where another 5% of the famous quotes and figures of speech you've ever heard come from.
I do wish people in this fandom particularly on the Leftist Website TM really understood how deeply homophobia has shaped public perception of Batman and how the comics themselves have been shaped by that in turn. I grew up being teased on the playground for liking Batman because that's gay. The Christmas before this one I sat down to eat with a friend's family and in a conversation where we were jokingly saying "oh yeah he's a freak (positive)" about Batman this friend's dad (a man in his fifties who ostensibly likes Batman) responded very earnestly "well of course he's a freak, he's in that big house alone with those little boys". Batman comics tried to minimize Robin and make Batman a harsher character in direct response to the theory of acquired homosexuality spread during the Lavender Scare which posits that all gay men are child predators which means that any man who presents as not stereotypically masculine and isn't married to a woman is inherently a danger to male children (who will then become gay men/child predators themselves) which is a concept that persists TO THIS DAY. Can anyone hear me!!
tags via @courtofdunces
OP, you or some other dedicated fan might be able to source this, but I recall a comic con panel around 2014-2016 where Scott Snyder and others were responding to questions about how they had changed the Robin mantle to being an âinternshipâ for the New 52 era. Someone important (not Snyder, probably an editor) made a crack about how weird it is to have Bruce living with a young boy, and it got laughs and⌠yeah, same old insecure homophobic shit even a decade ago.
Thatâs what I recall anyway, correct me if Iâm wrong or misremembering.
For my part, Iâm just thinking about how Geoff Johns created an AU where Harvey Dentâs sister is both Bruceâs love interest and eventually Two-Face, expressly so Johns could explore a Batman/Two-Face relationship that they âcouldnâtâ have in mainstream canon with Harvey.
I remember an incident along those lines, too. This anecdote that was posted to tumblr is the best record of it I can find at the moment:
It's sourced to a thread about Forever Evil on Bleeding Cool's old forum, which is no longer with us, but it would seem to be from 2013.
There are ten trillion pictures of flowering trees to the point where they sometimes seem trite and overdone. But then you see a tree in full flower and go holy shit this rules and I've gotta show this to everyone so they can experience the same magic and wonder and there are ten trillion and one pictures of flowering trees
the "language is a social construct, therefore linguistic misinformation is impossible. any claim about language is true if enough people say it is" misconception is of course annoying when applied to stuff like grammar because it's wrong in a nuanced way that's important to explain correctly to avoid spreading even worse ideas about language. but with etymology it's like. no that's not even the part of language that's a social construct, you're making a claim about history. this is something that you really shouldn't think you can just make up
language changes over time but a popular tumblr post claiming that a figure of speech from the bible is actually the short version of its own comeback isn't language changing
btw one of the main tells for false etymology posts online is that they often are presented as something the poster "realized", as opposed to "learned". as though historical facts about how language has evolved are things that you can figure out on your own by thinking about words hard enough

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
1300-1400 clothing of Lower Empire
The Byzantine Empire, that is.
Oh FUCK
My eyes have just fallen out of my head because of this gorgeous fabric.
Because one can never get enough visuals of medieval clothing âŚ
it is possible for every adult around to have once been the crying baby on the bus or that sick kid who threw up everywhere and they didn't get mobbed to death by annoyed adults because we don't do that. actually the public space and society itself belongs to everyone inside it, including people who you feel are inconveniencing you
even people who try to live out an off-the-grid self sustainable life got this far through the care of other people. it is impossible to extract yourself as an individual from the web of social connections that exist in humanity, and thus any argument against being likewise responsible to shared human need isn't worthwhile. "i didn't have a choice to be born tho" yeah and now you don't have a choice again, you must put up with children and disabled people regardless of your silly little thoughts
trying to speed-run through some eps of my rewatch rn so Iâm not doing proper live-blogging but will circle back and write some thoughts later but. Itâs very interesting to me how in 2x10 sam is so insistent on roping Ava into things and when she wants to walk away and forget abt things and return to her ânormal lifeâ sam is like âyou really donât want to know the Truth abt who you are???â and he really pushes the whole âweâre connected!!â thing. And like, I get it. He doesnât want to feel alone in all this. He wants to connect with these other ppl that are like him. But itâs just interesting to me how in previous episodes and on other cases sam sort of laments having to tell people abt the supernatural and wishes they could âstay innocentâ and oblivious to whatâs out there. But here heâs so set on telling Ava everything and shattering the illusions of her perfect life. And if feels a bit like sam is projecting his own fears and wishes onto her. Like HE wishes heâd known abt all this stuff sooner. HE feels like he was out of the loop abt things and now thinks well EYE would have wanted to know so I must tell this woman everything. And he had his ânormal lifeâ shattered by the supernatural (though itâs interesting to note that Sam himself refers to his life in california as trying to ârunâ from his destiny. To which dean promptly says FUCK DESTINY.) Anyways, how Sam acts with Ava, felt to me like he was projecting and treating her like HE would want to be treated but not considering what she might actually want. And he just seemed so desperate to connect with her, esp after all the other special children he met so far either died or wanted nothing to do with him. And itâs just an interesting shift, where before sam mightâve wanted to preserve peopleâs normal apple pie lives now heâs seeing ânormalâ as escapism and not real and heâs prioritizing the need of Knowing and the Truth abt whatâs out there
okay and now in 2x12 Sam is like "no we can't tell ronald the truth. he's safer not knowing abt the supernatural." like truly he just wanted another Special Child to bond with and suffer with so he NEEDED to tell ava everything for HIS sake
My woke take, as someone who has worked in both a public library and a school library, is that we desperately need both more books that are at a higher reading level but a less mature subject matter, and more books that are at a lower reading level but a more mature subject matter, because 8 year olds who are advanced readers are still 8 year olds and don't want to read about graphic violence and torture, and teens and adults who have learning difficulties or who are just later readers for whatever reason are still teens and adults and don't want to read about Billy the Bunny going to school or whatever the hell.
Shoutout to people in the notes also mentioning people learning the language, I should've mentioned that really, given that I've been stuck reading German picture books myself while learning German.
do think when people say "we know marriage is a social construct, but it's a legal way to be able to take care of someone else and vice versa" as if those of us making a point about marriage (i would say, a lot of us being aromantic people especially) don't know this fact, are missing a bit of the point about why this is stressed and potentially not giving enough grace to (again especially aromantic) people who say this.
when it's framed as a "so just get married for legality reasons" and im like. you mean like how gay people married/marry people of the opposite gender for legality reasons? and that's considered to be a symptom of a problem, not the solution? you want people to "just" get married against their will because it's the only solution this system has available?
if people cannot or will not get married for whatever reason -- not just for being aromantic, but, say, due to inefficient disability support measures within marriage, because of having had bad experiences with marriage in the past, because of being polyamorous, because some element of marriage is ineffective, unwanted, limited, discriminatory, or hell, because you can't find somebody to marry or nobody wants to marry you, or maybe because you just plain don't want to without there being a distinct Reason -- then it's a problem that this is the only framework in place for people to be afforded certain legal and social protections.
i am glad for others that more people can get married, but it's a flawed institution with gaping holes that isn't for everyone and builds social structures that leave so many people behind and unsupported. this is abundantly obvious in the way that we saw why people pushed for the need for equal marriage in the first place.
that's what's said when making a point that it's a social construct. and also what's meant (partially) when pushing against the idea that "love" as concept isn't at the core of queer (amongst others hinted at in this post) activism, because it's about building better structures. if the only people we care about are those we "love" within a family unit, or those who successfully manage to pretend that unit without actually really wanting it, and if not being in that unit for whatever reason means that care isn't going to be/is no longer afforded, then are we really doing any better than heteronormativity?
more people need to read up on "amatonormativity" from the original source (this is a summary from the same person written in 2012 and so doesn't include aromantic, but it's all in there) before they start pushing marriage as the ultimate goal of queer liberation, or indeed any liberation.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
gonna be honest i donât know how many more âenter the 6 digit code we sent to your phoneâs i got left in me
okay but chess terminology is like. you pinned your opponent's hung knight and now you can mate? oh im sure
OH I'M SURE