I submitted a short story for a contest at college and just now heard older colleagues and employees can also submit their own, so i feel like i put in that much effort just to be beaten by other people with way more experience than me.
Can i ask for a few words of comfort? I've been having a rough time with finals, so I would really appreciate it coming from you
anon, it sounds like you're having a shitter. i hate this for you, and i hope you've indulged in a bit of a wallow. you deserve it.
but, unless i've misread this, it doesn't look like any decisions have actually been made yet? people with more experience may very well have submitted stories to this contest. the outcome of their submissions is - as yet - not something you know.
"don't borrow grief from the future" is one of the few pithy pop psychology phrases which is genuinely good advice. trying to pre-guess how this contest will unfold is futile, pre-empting feeling miserable in the future just makes you miserable in the present.
but - i'll be honest - it's also a mantra which i've always found a bit... solemn. a bit sincere. a bit passive, even.
i've said before that my main piece of life advice is fortune favours the bold - that the best thing you can have in your arsenal is the audacity. my other main piece of life advice is similar, and is something i've always found useful in situations such as this:
but first they must catch you
this is not - to be clear - me telling you to commit crimes [although, let's be honest, you should have it in mind if you want to start...].
it's what the sun said to a rabbit named el-ahrairah.
All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
el-ahrairah is being told here that rabbits will never be more powerful than foxes and weasels. you are at a stage in your life where you have less experience than other contestants who have also submitted stories. on paper, the fight can only ever have one outcome: the fox eats the rabbit; the professor with half a century of creative writing experience clobbers the undergraduate student into last place.
but there are going to be lots and lots of things in life which - on paper - you are almost guaranteed to fail or lose or be terrible at or embarrass yourself doing. you will find yourself in lots of situations in which the competition is bigger than you and stronger than you, and has more numbers or more resources or more experience than you.
and you have to be able to be clear-eyed about that - this is one of those times when delulu is not the solulu.
but what you also have to bear in mind is that any and every assessment of things on paper is meaningless. because it fails to take into account that there must be a catching first.
a fox will eat a rabbit. but first it must catch it.
a professor with half a century of creative writing experience expects their story to outperform an undergraduate's. but first it must catch it.
the other contestants may very well have much, much more experience than you. they might have more free time to spend writing. they might know famous authors who give them advice for free. and if the competition is a "quote your cv" or "name-drop your nepotism", sure, you might be fucked.
but if the competition is "is this story compelling?" the piece that wins won't self-importantly present a list of its credentials. it will slip through a gap, escape a dead end, play a prank, pull off a feat. it will be plucky and bold and sly. it will evade the clutches of the bigger and stronger stories by being full of cunning.
all of which is to say, i am a great proponent of living the life of a trickster god - or, to stick with the rabbit theme, bugs bunny. i have always believed that "who's going to stop me?" is a legitimate motivation for anything. i have always believed that "you and who's army?" is the only response to being told you don't have a chance. and i have always believed that it doesn't matter what it seems on paper that the outcome of something should be... because that outcome is only guaranteed if they catch you.
and they've only caught you when you're dead.
because - sure - your prediction of what's going to happen might be absolutely right - or maybe i did misread this, and what you feared would happen did indeed happen. you might get told that your story is an affront to language and you should never pick up a pen again. the same is true with your finals. yes, the worse case scenario you can imagine for yourself might indeed happen.
i bet your enemies would feel pretty pleased with themselves if that happened. they'd think that was final! that there was no way you could wiggle out of that one! that you were never going to dust yourself off, and get back to the drawing board, and - motivated by a healthy dose of audacity and spite - keep surviving, and writing, and thinking, and being curious, and practising, and getting ever more cunning with every word. ready to pop up later and say "yeah... you should have tried a bit harder to stop me, shouldn't you?"
have your night of sulking - an impeccably fun activity - but then send your self-defeating impulses hence.
you're not beaten yet, hen. first they must catch you.