-> Netflixâs Michael Jackson: The Verdict debunked pt 1
-> Netflixâs Michael Jackson: The Verdict debunked pt 2
-> Netflixâs Michael Jackson: The Verdict debunked pt 3
-> Netflix Called Out By Artist
The Chandler Allegations đ
-> Chandler Allegations pt 1
-> Chandler Allegations pt 2
-> Chandler Allegations pt 3
-> Chandler Allegations pt 4
The Arvizo Allegations đ
-> Arvizo Allegations pt 1
-> Arvizo Allegations pt 2
-> Arvizo Allegations pt 3
-> Arvizo Allegations pt 4
Did The Description Match? đ
No, the description did not match. Every verifiable piece of documentation we possess that is public record affirms that it was not a match, despite the continuing media lie and lies from prosecutors. Here are two links where I have proven such.
-> Lauren Weis Is Lying
-> It Was Not A Match!
Who Is Rodney Allen? đ
-> 90âs Google Archive posts of Rodney Allen admitting to framing Michael Jackson + alleged letters he wrote
-> The Plot To Destroy Michael Jackson | Video proof of Rodney Allen coaching boys
Did The Jury Flip? đ
No, 10 out of the original 12 that deliberated maintain a Not Guilty verdict, as well as 8 alternates who did not deliberate but sat in on the entire trial. 2 jurors flipped 2 months after the verdict, contradicting their past interviews and original statements made to the media following the verdict. Money was an incentive. I provided sources/evidence in an answered ask.
-> The Jury Did Not Flip!
Did Jackson Possess Child Porn? đ
Absolutely not! Possession of child pornography is a felony crime, which would have resulted in him being charged with possession, not to mention he would have been convicted. What Michael Jackson did own was art photography books, which I have made numerous at length posts explaining.
-> The photography Books
-> No Child Porn Ever Found!
Miscellaneous Sources đ
-> Train Station Lie
-> Train Station Lie pt 2
-> More Lies From James Safechuck
-> Thriller Jacket Lie
-> Wade Robson Pretending To Be A Therapist To Grift Money
-> Matt Fiddes Was Never MJâs Bodyguard, He Is A Liar!
-> Wade Robson Asked To Get Married At Neverland Ranch
Nude Photos of Children? đ
-> Nude Pictures of Jacksonâs Friends
Additional Sources/Misc Allegations
đŹ 1  đ 2  â¤ď¸ 24 ¡ Post by @dukeofdelirium ¡ 7 images ¡ Hello! Since you seem to be very well versed in everything involving the allegations
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
what did you think of the show (or lestat) framing louis as liar because of things that they changed later (like the scars)?
You do realize that they did that intentionally.
And that is literally CANON from the books, too, right?
"In fact, after reading his account of things, I ached for him, ached for his romantic illusions, and even his dishonesty. I ached even for his gentlemanly malice and his physical presence, the deceptively soft sound of his voice. Of course I hated him for the lies he told about me. But the love was far greater than the hate."
This cast has talked about Louis lying about some things since BEFORE the show aired.
"Not everything Louis says is a lie!"
I had forgotten about this part.
Unfortunately I could only find this quality of the video, but it's
It's just that the FANDOM did not want to hear it and labeled anyone pointing it out racist.
Despite all my many misgiving with the show, Sam Reid is still so masterful. He manages to make this OC Lestat so FUNNY. I'm laughing every twenty lines with his delivery.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The Netflix hit piece really be saying Michael never had any wife stay at Neverland?? Both Lisa and Debbie stayed there. And Debbie even gave interviews. From November 25, 1997:
Debbie Rowe Jackson gives an interview to KNBC in Neverland where she denies tabloid rumors of an affair between Michael and Lisa Marie and announces that she is pregnant with a baby girl that she and Michael want to name Paris Michael Katherine.
This was while Michael and Lisa were in South Africa together, and she was accompanying him on HIStory World Tour.
Yeah, one of the prosecutors did, Ron Zonen. He claimed not only that neither of Michaelâs wives stayed at Neverland ranch, but that no ADULT PERIOD had ever stayed in his bedroom. Which obviously isnât true, as numerous adults testified to sleeping in his room including mothers like Joy Robson and Marie Elizabeth Barnes
Debbie can be seen sitting in Michael's bed and playfully rubbing his back in the behind the scenes of the Oprah interview when they are all watching the footage đ Zonen was literally rewriting reality, huh?
Yes Katherine Jackson never talked about all of this but she did say ÂŤÂ they were bad kids  in one interview. Plus wasnât one magazine given to the kids during the trial without any protection, the kids went through the pages and only then it was sent to test fingerprints.
Yes, I talked about this in the linked post in that answered ask. Journalists reported this at the time and the Jury witnessed it. The prosecution was literally tampering with State evidence to try and get a conviction, which is highly illegal. Tom Mesereau insinuated as much throughout the transcripts. Aphrodite Jones also stated such, whom Iâve previously spoken of. She was a journalist that originally thought Michael was guilty, buying into the media portrayal. She said she didnât realize it was all a sham until the verdict day. She stated that she asked to review the evidence herself which the judge allowed her to do, and it was then that she realized the truth, which was that he was innocent. Thatâs why she wrote her book exposing the conspiracy against Michael Jackson, which she had to self publish because the media and her own publisher told her they refused to release anything pro Jackson. She has said many times she was terrified to publish her Michael Jackson book and even had a plan to flee the country because she would be exposing not just herself but her colleagues.
Hi, do you know about Lauren Weis? I was wondering if you heard the audio of her saying that Jordan matched the description on MJâs crotch. I canât remember the exact name, but it was in a podcast. I know it isnât true, and I know guilters shove their versions of "proof" at people with no context or truth at all, so I wanted to know your input if youâve heard / seen of this.
Lauren Weis is a former prosecutor and helped spearhead the Chandler investigation with Sneddon and other figures. She and Larry Feldman, the civil attorney, stated Jordan Chandler was cooperating until July 6th, 1994. This means 6 and a half months went by past the January 25th, 1994 settlement. And at no point in that time period, did Sneddon ever produce evidence that the description Jordan gave matched reality, nor was Jackson ever indicted or charged, which he would have been had it matched, as it was a search warrant forced strip search. Sneddon ever even produced Jordanâs description he gave police, either. No drawing, no transcript.
There is no evidence to proclaim it matched. Logic can tell any person with a functioning brain that much. We know for a fact that the biggest detail he gave (circumcision) was wrong!
Evan Chandler was jewish, MJ was raised a JW, he clearly assumed Michael was circumcised as itâs fairly common practice especially concerning religion. They got it fucking wrong.
The prosecutors were literally fighting Jackson and his team of lawyers when they were attempting to get the pictures, the full unredacted warrant, and transcript description Jordan gave.
They never presented anything regarding this strip search to the 2 grand juries as evidence that Jackson committed a crime because it didnât match. Larry Feldman himself moved to have these photographs barred from court in preparation for trial.
Even in Ray Chandlerâs book, he claims Jordan took multiple hours during his time relaying to the cops to actually give any kind of coherent description.
The very fact Jordan Chandler said Michael was circumcised and he in reality was not, PROVES he was coached! Thereâs literally plotted drawings in Victor Gutierrezâs book of what to tell the cops, and it specifically says to say Michael is circumcised.
Every single verifiable piece of documentation proves beyond any shadow of doubt that what Jordan told the police was not reality.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Exposing Netflixâs Michael Jackson: The Verdict Pt 3
I have already discussed major lies in part one and part two, focusing on the first two installments of Netflixâs 3 part docu series. Here, I will go over the lies told in the last part, so buckle up buttercups!
Here is a link to the first part
Here is a link to the second part
Alright, letâs do this.
The third part starts off strong with something easily debunkable; thanks Ron Zonen for continuing to be a stupid cunt! Youâre making my job more of a breeze!!
They begin by Zonen talking about how Michael is smiling in this deposition while being asked by a lawyer about Jordan Chandler and the CSA allegations from the Chandler family in 1993. Zonen, as per usual, lies his ass off. Notice how they donât provide any context for this deposition?
That is because this deposition was not ABOUT the CSA allegation. It was for a civil lawsuit filed by the Neverland 5 (a group of 5 former employees who all sued Jackson for wrongful dismissal after being fired). Jackson countersued for theft, and he won, proving they were stealing his personal items and auctioning them off, etc. Many of these employees sold stories to tabloids and testified for the prosecution, which I will discuss in depth in this post. This deposition was taken at The Four Seasons Hotel in New York on March 1st, 1996. Jacksonâs lawyers stop the questioning about Chandler because it has nothing to do with the fucking case. Jackson is clearly outraged and irritated, and in disbelief at the manâs fucking audacity, as the lawyer questioning him asks him if he has been accused of sexually abusing Macaulay Culkin or Brett Barnes; both vehemently deny abuse to this day and testified on his behalf! You can watch the full deposition here:
They then begin to introduce the Neverland 5, which I have talked about extensively in the past. Every single one of these witnesses for the prosecution splattered under cross examination, some of them signed legal declarations and testified before the 2 grand juries stating nothing ever happened and they never saw anything, 3 who testified repeatedly changed their stories and were caught in a multitude of lies on the witness standânot to mention, they all sold stories to tabloids.
And donât worry, Iâll cook them each individually. But for now, back to Zonen.
Zonen makes a very bold claim that supposedly girls never stayed in Michaelâs bedroom, peddling this long debunked media lie that he was obsessed with little boys, and he even claims he never had a wife stay over.
Firstly, letâs address the lie about only boys being in Jacksonâs room. This was debunked when numerous defense witnesses who were female testified to having slept in Jacksonâs room during the trial. Among them, notable ones are: Chantal Robson (Wade Robsonâs sister), Joy Robson (Wade Robsonâs mother), Simone Jackson, Brandi Jackson, Karlee Barnes (Brett Barnesâ sister), Marie Elizabeth (Brett Barnesâ mother). Hell, even June Chandler who testified for the prosecution stated she was allowed to go anywhere on the property at any time. Another notable girl that slept in Michaelâs room is Allison V. Smith, who said this, pictured below along with an excerpt from Dr. William B. Van Valin, who spent nights with Michael as a friend. He was an adult.
I mean seriously, how ridiculous!
Now that that nonsense is debunked, letâs address the second part of Zonenâs claim, which is that Michael Jackson never had his wife at the ranch. While true that they didnât often spend time at the ranch (because Michael was living at her place most of the time), they did spend nights there as Lisa Marie Presleyâs daughter has stated, including never before seen photos taken there. And not only that, but Michael on audio tape and Lisa Marie in her memoir corroborate the fact they werenât often at the ranch because he stayed with her.
Michael, Lisa and her daughter Riley were all taking pictures the same night at the ranch. Riley posted these photos a couple of years ago.
Is Zonen trying to allege that Lisa Marie and Michael were not a ârealâ couple, or not in love? If so, Lisa Marie states otherwise and so does her daughter, as well as all of Michaelâs family. Lisa Marie wrote of him in her memoir in quite a romantic way, stating she was ânever happierâ in her entire life than when she was with him. Other people corroborate the legitimacy of their relationship, including house staff member Judy Brisse, who has spoken out against James Safechuck, a posthumous accuser:
Judy Brisse worked for Michael for years. In this video, she talks about making cots for Lisaâs two children while they were staying at the ranch, to which Michael helped her. She states Lisa and Michael were dating at the time.
Ron Zonen then goes on to talk about other boys allegedly abused by Jackson including Wade Robson, Brett Barnes, and Macaulay Culkin. All three of these men who were all adults at the time testified for Jackson. All denied abuse. Macaulay Culkin in particular was absolutely pissed throughout his testimony, stating the prosecution never even talked to him to ask if it was true.
And Ron Zonen did perhaps the most shameful thing Iâve ever seen a prosecutor do during his questioning of Wade and Macaulay. A fan who was in the court room at the time and watched the testimony live stated the entire court was aghast at his conduct, and stated âAt one point the prosecutor (Zonen) was so frustrated at how well he (Wade) was doing for the defense, he leaned on the podium out of frustration and goes âYou know, maybe he did things to you and you were asleepâ. Everybody in the court room just gasped, thinking how can they be so desperate?â
Brett Barnes direct and cross May 5th, 2005 ^
Wade Robson cross examination May 5th, 2005 ^
Macaulay Culkin direct and cross May 11th, 2005 ^ (The first two transcripts are direct from Tom Mesereau. The far right transcript is cross from Zonen).
Letâs move forward to another absurd segment.
This will all pertain to the 1108 witnesses.
Diane Dimond talks about Jason Francia whilst pretending to cry, whom I previously mentioned in the second part of this series of posts. I linked a past post which had documents attached within it of his police interview in 1993. I cannot post them here, as tumblr has a picture limit, but you will see these documents in that linked post. Jason Francia was the only child that alleged anything about Michael despite the prosecution interviewing anywhere from 40 to 100 children. He originally denied the allegation that Michael did anything wrong to him, and after being pressured for hours, he caved. I will re-link the post for your easy access where you can look at pieces of the transcript yourself.
đŹ 0  đ 0  â¤ď¸ 3 ¡ dukeofdelirium ¡ I have a question if you donât mind, what was the deal about MJ supposedly having a nude image of a kid? I
Now, Blanca Francia, as previously mentioned, extorted Michael Jackson amidst the Chandler allegations, using Larry Feldman to do it, the same civil attorney that worked for the Chandlerâs and that then represented the Arvizoâs. She was also friends with Victor Gutierrez, and there is even a photo of her with him in the book he was sued over. Victor befriended many of Michaelâs employees and was involved in the Neverland 5âs lawsuit.
Blanca Francia was one of Michaelâs former maids that he fired in 1991. In 1993, she then sold a story to Hard Copy (Diane Dimondâs tv show) where she claimed she saw Wade Robson in the shower with MJ. She sold this story for $20,000. However, in 1994, 2005, AND 2016 she states under oath 3 separate times across decades that it never fucking happened and she never saw that. Diane Dimond embellishes anything and everything to do with Blanca Francia, claiming she saw numerous boys in the shower even though Blanca never said that even in her tabloid lies. In 1994 alone, Blanca stated under oath she saw ONLY Jackson in the shower 6+ times.
And, Blanca Francia literally sold pictures of her own son to tabloids for profit. She was deadass pimping her kid for cash despite his protests. But apparently MJ is the bad guy here? Yeah, right.
Adrian McManus, another former fired maid, unsurprisingly made her tabloid rounds as well. Before she started cashing in on her tabloid CSA lies, she was selling tell-all kinky sex stories about Michael and Lisa Marie. Which is it? Is the man a homosexual child molester or is he straight? Pick a damn struggle, bitch.
Not only was McManus found to have committed perjury and acted with malice in court, but she was one of the employees countersued by Jackson for theft. She still owes over a million dollars to the estate, which she never paid Jackson back for while he was alive. She gloats now about not having to, because heâs dead. She fabricates the most insane stories, claiming there were secret CP VHS tapes which raids never produced, claiming there were vast amounts of Vaseline everywhere to use to rape boys (even though literally none of his accusers have ever said anything about Vaseline), she claims she saw boyâs underwear all over the place with no proof, and she signed a legal declaration and testified in 1993-1994 that she never saw anything happen.
And by the way, the items she stole? Memorabilia, clothing, hats, games etc meant for sick children. She claimed in the trial that she saw Michael abuse Jordan Chandler and Macaulay Culkin. Obviously, her credibility was destroyed with Macâs testimony.
Ralph Chacon was a security guard who was also fired by Jackson for theft. He claimed he walked around the ranch and saw Michael giving Jordan oral. He conceded to perjury in 1996 by stating he saw and heard things he later said he did not. He was sanctioned by the judge, and ordered to pay Michael Jackson for theft and malice, just as McManus was. Perjury was proven in the Neverland 5âs depositions, in which they all attempted to conceal connections to Victor Gutierrez. Later on, they admitted that Victor instructed them sell stories and paid them a couple hundred each to do so.
Chacon, like McManus, had stolen memorabilia and letters and stored them in a brief case, intending to appear on Hard Copy to sell stories for a vast amount of money, and to write a book.
Phillippe LeMarque and his wife were cooks briefly at Neverland for approximately 10 months. They claimed they saw Michael abusing Macaulay and that they were so shocked they dropped the food they were serving. Clearly though, they werenât shocked enough, considering they along with all the other prosecution witnesses never reported anything to the police. His credibility was destroyed as well when Mac showed up. He sold stories to tabloids like all the rest, including Kassim Abdool, for money. After they left employment with Jackson, they went into the Internet pornography business after declaring bankruptcy. Baby them bills were dueeeeee lmao
They then talk about June Chandler who testified for the prosecution. She lied like the rest of them, and her good for nothing rotten son refused to testify when hunted down by the prosecution. In Michaelâs FBI files, it states that Jordan told them he would âlegally fightâ any attempt to make him testify against Jackson. June Chandler admitted in her testimony that she had not seen or spoken to her son in 11 years, because Jordan Chandler sought legal emancipation from his parents following the Chandler allegations, which was granted to him as a young teenager. She also stated under oath that she was allowed to go anywhere on Jacksonâs property at any time, as previously mentioned.
Unmentioned in this doc is that the defense had prepared for over 500 witnesses. They had uncalled witnesses there to testify against Jordan Chandler had he shown up, because Jordan had privately admitted to them that Jackson never touched him.
An LAPD officer then states in this documentary that the supposed description Jordan Chandler gave to police was a match. This is not true, and we have numerous verifiable documents to prove it.
đŹ 2  đ 15  â¤ď¸ 68 ¡ @mewnectarine so lemme get this straight: you have seen this evidence and then proceeded to boldly claim that Jordan Chan
Here is a post I made where a guilter tried to confront me specifically about this subject. In my response, I give tons of documentation to prove them wrong which I cannot upload on this post due to Tumblrâs image limit. Even in 1994, police sources told the media that the description didnât match reality.
Not only did an officer that interviewed Jordan say he told her Jackson was circumcised which Jacksonâs official autopsy disproves (he was uncircumcised), but the Chandler families attorney Feldman moved to have these photographs barred from court. Furthermore, no arrest warrant was made following this strip search.
Again, this was a search warrant. Had the description matched reality, Jackson would not have only been arrested immediately, but 2 separate grand juries would have absolutely indicted him based on this alone.
Aside from this proof, the story of markings allegedly matching has never been substantiated. Everyone on planet earth knew Jackson had vitiligo by this point, so no matter what Jordan said, it canât be believed beyond a reasonable doubt. If it didnât match, they could have simply excused it as a result of his having vitiligo. The Chandler family themselves admitted to talking about this tactic with their attorney Feldman in Ray Chandlerâs (Evan Chandlerâs brother) book All That Glitters. They also admit to the fact that if Michael had just given them millions of dollars, they wouldnât have accused him of anything in said book. And, they admit to the fact they did not want the potential criminal trial to go before their civil lawsuit. Because Jackson would have won a criminal trial in 1994, and he would have won his original countersuit of extortion he filed against them.
Sorry Netflix, documentation and my working logical brain says youâre full of steaming shit đŠ
Another lie Ron Zonen perpetuates is that the settlement is $23 million. I swear, these morons canât fucking read court documents. The settlement was $15 million and is unredacted in the settlement agreement, written within the confession of judgement. They make up random figures: 20 mill, 23 mill, hell Iâve even seen 30 mill! It was 15 million.
They also keep pushing this idea that the civil settlement stopped the criminal investigation and potential trial. This is not true. A civil settlement cannot stop a criminal investigation and cannot stop the government from charging someone with a crime. The trial never happened because the Chandler family stopped cooperating with the police, though they did for around half a year following the settlement. Even after Jordan refused to testify, Sneddon still brought 2 grand juries. They found no evidence to indict Jackson.
If you want to read more about the Chandler allegations, I highly encourage you to read my in depth thread which thoroughly discredits them.
đŹ 0  đ 6  â¤ď¸ 13 ¡ The Chandler Allegations ¡ On August 17th,1993 the Los Angeles police department opened an investigation against Michael J
The Netflix documentary then switches to focus on Janet Arvizo, the mother of the 2005âs trial accuser.
FYI, Janet Arvizo got on the witness stand and said Michael Jackson was trying to abduct her kids via a hot air balloon to deport them to Brazil. You would have to be a complete and utter moron to believe her testimony. She and her children also alleged they were kept away from clocks, despite clocks being every goddamn place at the ranch, including a GIANT clock in front of the Neverland Train Station.
đŹ 3  đ 6  â¤ď¸ 19 ¡ Remember when Janet Arvizo said Michael Jackson and his people were going to make her and her kids disappear via hot air b
She claimed that she was held hostage by MJ yet CCTV footage showed her going shopping and to spas all on Michaelâs credit cards she ran up. If this is a hostage situation, can I be next? Lol!
Iâve discussed the Arvizo allegations in depth, and will not repeat myself here. What I will say is this: the reason the conspiracy charge was made and the reason this outlandish story of being held hostage was created was because the police, during their raids, broke their search warrant and entered an office they didnât have a warrant for. There, they found video footage of the Arvizoâs dated AFTER the original felony complaint. This is why the prosecution completely changed their timeline. The video, which is linked in my Arvizo thread, completely disproved their allegation of abuse.
So the prosecution ultimately showed up to trial with a timeline as follows. Michael Jackson has this kid around him for numerous years and only AFTER the entire goddamn world is watching him and heâs being actively investigated by two different police forces, the FBI, CPS etc for molestation does he then decide to actually molest the little fuck.
Again, you would have to be a complete and utter moron to believe this.
Ron Zonen lies once more (how many times now?) claiming Michael only befriended families and kids that didnât have father figures. That isnât true: the Barnes family, the Culkin family, the Cascio family, and many more.
The Arvizoâs falsely accused their father of CSA against the daughter. The daughter admitted to this on the witness stand in the trial. He was ostracized by them, and at the encouragement of Janet Arvizo, the mother, the children started essentially harassing Michael Jackson, calling him their âdaddyâ. Even Janet herself called him their âdaddyâ, all of which was an obvious attempt to emotionally manipulate him into staying in contact. In reality, Jackson did not actually spend much time around the Arvizo family. Gavin himself testified to this stating frustration at Michael having âabandonedâ him. Michael Jackson did not trust this family, and wanted to distance himself as much as possible. They repeatedly tried to call him and send him letters, all of which was proven in court. And other celebrities, including George Lopez, testified to the Arvizo family trying to extort them prior to Jackson.
They go on to talk about Debbie Rowe. They claim she was totally anti-Jackson, but she was subpoenaed to testify for the prosecution, aka forced. Their dumbasses thought she was about to pull up to court to slander her man. They were out of their goddamn minds for calling his ex wife to testify for them. Hell, at that point they should have called Lisa Marie Presley too so she could give a global dick report on the man, considering she said he was the best she ever had đ¤Łđ
Debbie Rowe, you were a queen for swindling these racist white prosecutors and protecting your man. She is an icon and she is the moment đ I imagine it all went something like this:
Debbie: Michael is a psycho!
Zonen: woahhhh really??
Debbie: No, you stupid cunt
Debbie Roweâs testimony was the most devastating to the prosecution. She served as an unexpected character witness for Jackson, she accused everyone of using and abusing him, etc. The prosecution attempted to impeach her, because she destroyed their case for the final time. Speaking of impeachment, the prosecution also impeached numerous other witnesses that were their own.
Impeachment means to discredit and tell the jury and judge not to believe a witness. They impeached their own fucking witnesses. That is how laughable this case was.
Toward the end of this shameful Netflix doc, they bring up those two fuckass photography books. Iâve made numerous posts about them, which I will link, as I will not repeat myself for a 3rd damn time. These books are not pornographic nor are they erotic, and the prosecution seized other photography books of girls that they intentionally ignored to argue that Jackson was âboy obsessedâ.
đŹ 0  đ 4  â¤ď¸ 13 ¡ Letâs talk about the two photography books that detractors love to scream about ¡ We will be discussing both the book âBoy
đŹ 0  đ 2  â¤ď¸ 11 ¡ Post by @dukeofdelirium ¡ 10 images ¡ the biggest thing im nervous about with the doc is the mention of the books because
Diane Dimond of course is on film toting around her own copies of these books, which she has had in her possession for over 15 fucking years. She acts like these books are child porn. So what, Diane? You have had CP in your house for over a decade? Get fucking real.
Diane Dimond ends the doc saying ânot guilty doesnât mean innocentâ
Diane, you fucking witch. Innocence is PRESUMED! This is the foundation upon which America operates its judicial system. He was found not guilty 14 times in a row. The jury immediately following the verdict gave televised interviews stating there was no evidence they saw that could prove the prosecutionâs case. Both the Chandler and Arvizo allegations (the only allegations that existed during his life) were tried SIMULTANEOUSLY!
Not Guilty, read it and fucking weep, bitch.
Take my advice Netflix, instead of trying to play your Double Jeopardy, and read these documents.
This has been an exhaustive, yet rewarding time spent debunking and destroying their claims yet again. Remember guys, just because you read it in a magazine or see it on a tv screen, donât make it factual, as MJ said. Stay clowning their asses. I think Iâm done here đâď¸
They literally picked the most notorious guilter âjournalistâ that was sued by Michael Jackson for slander and libel, a failed prosecutor mad he lost the case, a State witness that was dating said prosecutor during trial (talk about conflict of fucking interest), some tabloid whores long since discredited, and a man who was literally committing crimes against Princess Diana and was proven to have done so whom had his awards revoked and had to issue a formal apology for what he did to her which resulted in her actual death. These are the people Netflix chose to parade around to try and convince the idiotic and uninformed global public that the verdict was incorrect.
as a fan and a feminist (wouldnt say radfem tho) i do support the notion of believing victims first but it's just so clear that the 2019 allegations were false but my peers who also feminists and radfems won't change their stance on 2019 and it's so frustrating because it's like all they can say is we believe victims and all these "what ifs" without looking at who they are, the proven inconsistencies and lies and the context... but idk it's a sticky situation
We should never just âbelieveâ anyone accusing anyone of felony crimes without presuming innocence of the accused, and then investigating the allegation accordingly and in an unbiased manner. If we remove these basic principles we operate our lives upon, anyone can be falsely accused, falsely prosecuted, imprisoned, etc. You are literally talking about removal of due process. This is an incredibly dangerous, not to mention incredibly immature and ignorant mindset to possess. At that point, letâs go back to the times of Witch Trials.
How many people have been falsely accused of crimes throughout human history that did not commit them? How many people have been accused for money, for fame, for attention, for praise, or straight up just because the accuser didnât fucking like them? It happens all the time, all over the world. To state otherwise is actually delusional.
It is the oldest trick in the book; Michael Jackson is just the most famous example of it.
Also, why are you âfriendsâ with radfems? Yikes
Wow, it's Diana Gabaldon a secret writer of ABC TVL now? Louis getting SAd as a kid? Really? I don't want the fans of this show to ever say Anne Rice retconned things as an insult when these people do it so blatantly.
I am so out of the loop these days and missing everything online so I don't know how I didn't catch this but - new audiobooks have been launched for original TVC trilogy?! Finally! What an amazing 50th anniversary gift! I am the kind of person that is firmly in the annoying club of "reading is superior and more immersive than audio books", but whatever makes people consume media in any way is great and positive thing. And I always had massive issue with TVC audio books. Simon Vance certainly has many fans in the fandom and no shade to him it's a subjective thing, but his almost Transylvanian accent and Dracula-esque take was really not clicking with me. But this new version directed by Gabra Zackman with incredible cast sounds really interesting đĽ°đ¤
IWTV and TVL were already released, and QOTD is coming in July!
VA cast: Dan Bittner, Vikas Adam, Paul Boehmer, Robin Miles
Gabra Zackmanâwho directed three new recordings in the seriesâshares more about working with narrators Vikas Adam, Dan Bittner, Paul Boehmer
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Do book-show fans know they can like the show without trying pretend other book fans are just overreacting and that the show is totally and completely what the author intended and the writers are totally honoring her and book fans that don't like these Hollywood changes are just stupid and wrong? Do they know they can admit the show is nothing like the books aside from basic plot points? Or is just that they are desperate to try to justify liking the show and the books at the same time when actually they obviously just like the show better?
I have never seen the fandom of an adaptation so desperate to shit on the source material just justify everything that the adaptation does.
Exposing Netflixâs Michael Jackson: The Verdict Pt 3
I have already discussed major lies in part one and part two, focusing on the first two installments of Netflixâs 3 part docu series. Here, I will go over the lies told in the last part, so buckle up buttercups!
Here is a link to the first part
Here is a link to the second part
Alright, letâs do this.
The third part starts off strong with something easily debunkable; thanks Ron Zonen for continuing to be a stupid cunt! Youâre making my job more of a breeze!!
They begin by Zonen talking about how Michael is smiling in this deposition while being asked by a lawyer about Jordan Chandler and the CSA allegations from the Chandler family in 1993. Zonen, as per usual, lies his ass off. Notice how they donât provide any context for this deposition?
That is because this deposition was not ABOUT the CSA allegation. It was for a civil lawsuit filed by the Neverland 5 (a group of 5 former employees who all sued Jackson for wrongful dismissal after being fired). Jackson countersued for theft, and he won, proving they were stealing his personal items and auctioning them off, etc. Many of these employees sold stories to tabloids and testified for the prosecution, which I will discuss in depth in this post. This deposition was taken at The Four Seasons Hotel in New York on March 1st, 1996. Jacksonâs lawyers stop the questioning about Chandler because it has nothing to do with the fucking case. Jackson is clearly outraged and irritated, and in disbelief at the manâs fucking audacity, as the lawyer questioning him asks him if he has been accused of sexually abusing Macaulay Culkin or Brett Barnes; both vehemently deny abuse to this day and testified on his behalf! You can watch the full deposition here:
They then begin to introduce the Neverland 5, which I have talked about extensively in the past. Every single one of these witnesses for the prosecution splattered under cross examination, some of them signed legal declarations and testified before the 2 grand juries stating nothing ever happened and they never saw anything, 3 who testified repeatedly changed their stories and were caught in a multitude of lies on the witness standânot to mention, they all sold stories to tabloids.
And donât worry, Iâll cook them each individually. But for now, back to Zonen.
Zonen makes a very bold claim that supposedly girls never stayed in Michaelâs bedroom, peddling this long debunked media lie that he was obsessed with little boys, and he even claims he never had a wife stay over.
Firstly, letâs address the lie about only boys being in Jacksonâs room. This was debunked when numerous defense witnesses who were female testified to having slept in Jacksonâs room during the trial. Among them, notable ones are: Chantal Robson (Wade Robsonâs sister), Joy Robson (Wade Robsonâs mother), Simone Jackson, Brandi Jackson, Karlee Barnes (Brett Barnesâ sister), Marie Elizabeth (Brett Barnesâ mother). Hell, even June Chandler who testified for the prosecution stated she was allowed to go anywhere on the property at any time. Another notable girl that slept in Michaelâs room is Allison V. Smith, who said this, pictured below along with an excerpt from Dr. William B. Van Valin, who spent nights with Michael as a friend. He was an adult.
I mean seriously, how ridiculous!
Now that that nonsense is debunked, letâs address the second part of Zonenâs claim, which is that Michael Jackson never had his wife at the ranch. While true that they didnât often spend time at the ranch (because Michael was living at her place most of the time), they did spend nights there as Lisa Marie Presleyâs daughter has stated, including never before seen photos taken there. And not only that, but Michael on audio tape and Lisa Marie in her memoir corroborate the fact they werenât often at the ranch because he stayed with her.
Michael, Lisa and her daughter Riley were all taking pictures the same night at the ranch. Riley posted these photos a couple of years ago.
Is Zonen trying to allege that Lisa Marie and Michael were not a ârealâ couple, or not in love? If so, Lisa Marie states otherwise and so does her daughter, as well as all of Michaelâs family. Lisa Marie wrote of him in her memoir in quite a romantic way, stating she was ânever happierâ in her entire life than when she was with him. Other people corroborate the legitimacy of their relationship, including house staff member Judy Brisse, who has spoken out against James Safechuck, a posthumous accuser:
Judy Brisse worked for Michael for years. In this video, she talks about making cots for Lisaâs two children while they were staying at the ranch, to which Michael helped her. She states Lisa and Michael were dating at the time.
Ron Zonen then goes on to talk about other boys allegedly abused by Jackson including Wade Robson, Brett Barnes, and Macaulay Culkin. All three of these men who were all adults at the time testified for Jackson. All denied abuse. Macaulay Culkin in particular was absolutely pissed throughout his testimony, stating the prosecution never even talked to him to ask if it was true.
And Ron Zonen did perhaps the most shameful thing Iâve ever seen a prosecutor do during his questioning of Wade and Macaulay. A fan who was in the court room at the time and watched the testimony live stated the entire court was aghast at his conduct, and stated âAt one point the prosecutor (Zonen) was so frustrated at how well he (Wade) was doing for the defense, he leaned on the podium out of frustration and goes âYou know, maybe he did things to you and you were asleepâ. Everybody in the court room just gasped, thinking how can they be so desperate?â
Brett Barnes direct and cross May 5th, 2005 ^
Wade Robson cross examination May 5th, 2005 ^
Macaulay Culkin direct and cross May 11th, 2005 ^ (The first two transcripts are direct from Tom Mesereau. The far right transcript is cross from Zonen).
Letâs move forward to another absurd segment.
This will all pertain to the 1108 witnesses.
Diane Dimond talks about Jason Francia whilst pretending to cry, whom I previously mentioned in the second part of this series of posts. I linked a past post which had documents attached within it of his police interview in 1993. I cannot post them here, as tumblr has a picture limit, but you will see these documents in that linked post. Jason Francia was the only child that alleged anything about Michael despite the prosecution interviewing anywhere from 40 to 100 children. He originally denied the allegation that Michael did anything wrong to him, and after being pressured for hours, he caved. I will re-link the post for your easy access where you can look at pieces of the transcript yourself.
đŹ 0  đ 0  â¤ď¸ 3 ¡ dukeofdelirium ¡ I have a question if you donât mind, what was the deal about MJ supposedly having a nude image of a kid? I
Now, Blanca Francia, as previously mentioned, extorted Michael Jackson amidst the Chandler allegations, using Larry Feldman to do it, the same civil attorney that worked for the Chandlerâs and that then represented the Arvizoâs. She was also friends with Victor Gutierrez, and there is even a photo of her with him in the book he was sued over. Victor befriended many of Michaelâs employees and was involved in the Neverland 5âs lawsuit.
Blanca Francia was one of Michaelâs former maids that he fired in 1991. In 1993, she then sold a story to Hard Copy (Diane Dimondâs tv show) where she claimed she saw Wade Robson in the shower with MJ. She sold this story for $20,000. However, in 1994, 2005, AND 2016 she states under oath 3 separate times across decades that it never fucking happened and she never saw that. Diane Dimond embellishes anything and everything to do with Blanca Francia, claiming she saw numerous boys in the shower even though Blanca never said that even in her tabloid lies. In 1994 alone, Blanca stated under oath she saw ONLY Jackson in the shower 6+ times.
And, Blanca Francia literally sold pictures of her own son to tabloids for profit. She was deadass pimping her kid for cash despite his protests. But apparently MJ is the bad guy here? Yeah, right.
Adrian McManus, another former fired maid, unsurprisingly made her tabloid rounds as well. Before she started cashing in on her tabloid CSA lies, she was selling tell-all kinky sex stories about Michael and Lisa Marie. Which is it? Is the man a homosexual child molester or is he straight? Pick a damn struggle, bitch.
Not only was McManus found to have committed perjury and acted with malice in court, but she was one of the employees countersued by Jackson for theft. She still owes over a million dollars to the estate, which she never paid Jackson back for while he was alive. She gloats now about not having to, because heâs dead. She fabricates the most insane stories, claiming there were secret CP VHS tapes which raids never produced, claiming there were vast amounts of Vaseline everywhere to use to rape boys (even though literally none of his accusers have ever said anything about Vaseline), she claims she saw boyâs underwear all over the place with no proof, and she signed a legal declaration and testified in 1993-1994 that she never saw anything happen.
And by the way, the items she stole? Memorabilia, clothing, hats, games etc meant for sick children. She claimed in the trial that she saw Michael abuse Jordan Chandler and Macaulay Culkin. Obviously, her credibility was destroyed with Macâs testimony.
Ralph Chacon was a security guard who was also fired by Jackson for theft. He claimed he walked around the ranch and saw Michael giving Jordan oral. He conceded to perjury in 1996 by stating he saw and heard things he later said he did not. He was sanctioned by the judge, and ordered to pay Michael Jackson for theft and malice, just as McManus was. Perjury was proven in the Neverland 5âs depositions, in which they all attempted to conceal connections to Victor Gutierrez. Later on, they admitted that Victor instructed them sell stories and paid them a couple hundred each to do so.
Chacon, like McManus, had stolen memorabilia and letters and stored them in a brief case, intending to appear on Hard Copy to sell stories for a vast amount of money, and to write a book.
Phillippe LeMarque and his wife were cooks briefly at Neverland for approximately 10 months. They claimed they saw Michael abusing Macaulay and that they were so shocked they dropped the food they were serving. Clearly though, they werenât shocked enough, considering they along with all the other prosecution witnesses never reported anything to the police. His credibility was destroyed as well when Mac showed up. He sold stories to tabloids like all the rest, including Kassim Abdool, for money. After they left employment with Jackson, they went into the Internet pornography business after declaring bankruptcy. Baby them bills were dueeeeee lmao
They then talk about June Chandler who testified for the prosecution. She lied like the rest of them, and her good for nothing rotten son refused to testify when hunted down by the prosecution. In Michaelâs FBI files, it states that Jordan told them he would âlegally fightâ any attempt to make him testify against Jackson. June Chandler admitted in her testimony that she had not seen or spoken to her son in 11 years, because Jordan Chandler sought legal emancipation from his parents following the Chandler allegations, which was granted to him as a young teenager. She also stated under oath that she was allowed to go anywhere on Jacksonâs property at any time, as previously mentioned.
Unmentioned in this doc is that the defense had prepared for over 500 witnesses. They had uncalled witnesses there to testify against Jordan Chandler had he shown up, because Jordan had privately admitted to them that Jackson never touched him.
An LAPD officer then states in this documentary that the supposed description Jordan Chandler gave to police was a match. This is not true, and we have numerous verifiable documents to prove it.
đŹ 2  đ 15  â¤ď¸ 68 ¡ @mewnectarine so lemme get this straight: you have seen this evidence and then proceeded to boldly claim that Jordan Chan
Here is a post I made where a guilter tried to confront me specifically about this subject. In my response, I give tons of documentation to prove them wrong which I cannot upload on this post due to Tumblrâs image limit. Even in 1994, police sources told the media that the description didnât match reality.
Not only did an officer that interviewed Jordan say he told her Jackson was circumcised which Jacksonâs official autopsy disproves (he was uncircumcised), but the Chandler families attorney Feldman moved to have these photographs barred from court. Furthermore, no arrest warrant was made following this strip search.
Again, this was a search warrant. Had the description matched reality, Jackson would not have only been arrested immediately, but 2 separate grand juries would have absolutely indicted him based on this alone.
Aside from this proof, the story of markings allegedly matching has never been substantiated. Everyone on planet earth knew Jackson had vitiligo by this point, so no matter what Jordan said, it canât be believed beyond a reasonable doubt. If it didnât match, they could have simply excused it as a result of his having vitiligo. The Chandler family themselves admitted to talking about this tactic with their attorney Feldman in Ray Chandlerâs (Evan Chandlerâs brother) book All That Glitters. They also admit to the fact that if Michael had just given them millions of dollars, they wouldnât have accused him of anything in said book. And, they admit to the fact they did not want the potential criminal trial to go before their civil lawsuit. Because Jackson would have won a criminal trial in 1994, and he would have won his original countersuit of extortion he filed against them.
Sorry Netflix, documentation and my working logical brain says youâre full of steaming shit đŠ
Another lie Ron Zonen perpetuates is that the settlement is $23 million. I swear, these morons canât fucking read court documents. The settlement was $15 million and is unredacted in the settlement agreement, written within the confession of judgement. They make up random figures: 20 mill, 23 mill, hell Iâve even seen 30 mill! It was 15 million.
They also keep pushing this idea that the civil settlement stopped the criminal investigation and potential trial. This is not true. A civil settlement cannot stop a criminal investigation and cannot stop the government from charging someone with a crime. The trial never happened because the Chandler family stopped cooperating with the police, though they did for around half a year following the settlement. Even after Jordan refused to testify, Sneddon still brought 2 grand juries. They found no evidence to indict Jackson.
If you want to read more about the Chandler allegations, I highly encourage you to read my in depth thread which thoroughly discredits them.
đŹ 0  đ 6  â¤ď¸ 13 ¡ The Chandler Allegations ¡ On August 17th,1993 the Los Angeles police department opened an investigation against Michael J
The Netflix documentary then switches to focus on Janet Arvizo, the mother of the 2005âs trial accuser.
FYI, Janet Arvizo got on the witness stand and said Michael Jackson was trying to abduct her kids via a hot air balloon to deport them to Brazil. You would have to be a complete and utter moron to believe her testimony. She and her children also alleged they were kept away from clocks, despite clocks being every goddamn place at the ranch, including a GIANT clock in front of the Neverland Train Station.
đŹ 3  đ 6  â¤ď¸ 19 ¡ Remember when Janet Arvizo said Michael Jackson and his people were going to make her and her kids disappear via hot air b
She claimed that she was held hostage by MJ yet CCTV footage showed her going shopping and to spas all on Michaelâs credit cards she ran up. If this is a hostage situation, can I be next? Lol!
Iâve discussed the Arvizo allegations in depth, and will not repeat myself here. What I will say is this: the reason the conspiracy charge was made and the reason this outlandish story of being held hostage was created was because the police, during their raids, broke their search warrant and entered an office they didnât have a warrant for. There, they found video footage of the Arvizoâs dated AFTER the original felony complaint. This is why the prosecution completely changed their timeline. The video, which is linked in my Arvizo thread, completely disproved their allegation of abuse.
So the prosecution ultimately showed up to trial with a timeline as follows. Michael Jackson has this kid around him for numerous years and only AFTER the entire goddamn world is watching him and heâs being actively investigated by two different police forces, the FBI, CPS etc for molestation does he then decide to actually molest the little fuck.
Again, you would have to be a complete and utter moron to believe this.
Ron Zonen lies once more (how many times now?) claiming Michael only befriended families and kids that didnât have father figures. That isnât true: the Barnes family, the Macaulkin family, the Cascio family, and many more.
The Arvizoâs falsely accused their father of CSA against the daughter. The daughter admitted to this on the witness stand in the trial. He was ostracized by them, and at the encouragement of Janet Arvizo, the mother, the children started essentially harassing Michael Jackson, calling him their âdaddyâ. Even Janet herself called him their âdaddyâ, all of which was an obvious attempt to emotionally manipulate him into staying in contact. In reality, Jackson did not actually spend much time around the Arvizo family. Gavin himself testified to this stating frustration at Michael having âabandonedâ him. Michael Jackson did not trust this family, and wanted to distance himself as much as possible. They repeatedly tried to call him and send him letters, all of which was proven in court. And other celebrities, including George Lopez, testified to the Arvizo family trying to extort them prior to Jackson.
They go on to talk about Debbie Rowe. They claim she was totally anti-Jackson, but she was subpoenaed to testify for the prosecution, aka forced. Their dumbasses thought she was about to pull up to court to slander her man. They were out of their goddamn minds for calling his ex wife to testify for them. Hell, at that point they should have called Lisa Marie Presley too so she could give a global dick report on the man, considering she said he was the best she ever had đ¤Łđ
Debbie Rowe, you were a queen for swindling these racist white prosecutors and protecting your man. She is an icon and she is the moment đ I imagine it all went something like this:
Debbie: Michael is a psycho!
Zonen: woahhhh really??
Debbie: No, you stupid cunt
Debbie Roweâs testimony was the most devastating to the prosecution. She served as an unexpected character witness for Jackson, she accused everyone of using and abusing him, etc. The prosecution attempted to impeach her, because she destroyed their case for the final time. Speaking of impeachment, the prosecution also impeached numerous other witnesses that were their own.
Impeachment means to discredit and tell the jury and judge not to believe a witness. They impeached their own fucking witnesses. That is how laughable this case was.
Toward the end of this shameful Netflix doc, they bring up those two fuckass photography books. Iâve made numerous posts about them, which I will link, as I will not repeat myself for a 3rd damn time. These books are not pornographic nor are they erotic, and the prosecution seized other photography books of girls that they intentionally ignored to argue that Jackson was âboy obsessedâ.
đŹ 0  đ 4  â¤ď¸ 13 ¡ Letâs talk about the two photography books that detractors love to scream about ¡ We will be discussing both the book âBoy
đŹ 0  đ 2  â¤ď¸ 11 ¡ Post by @dukeofdelirium ¡ 10 images ¡ the biggest thing im nervous about with the doc is the mention of the books because
Diane Dimond of course is on film toting around her own copies of these books, which she has had in her possession for over 15 fucking years. She acts like these books are child porn. So what, Diane? You have had CP in your house for over a decade? Get fucking real.
Diane Dimond ends the doc saying ânot guilty doesnât mean not innocentâ
Diane, you fucking witch. Innocence is PRESUMED! This is the foundation upon which America operates its judicial system. He was found not guilty 14 times in a row. The jury immediately following the verdict gave televised interviews stating there was no evidence they saw that could prove the prosecutionâs case. Both the Chandler and Arvizo allegations (the only allegations that existed during his life) were tried SIMULTANEOUSLY!
Not Guilty, read it and fucking weep, bitch.
Take my advice Netflix, instead of trying to play your Double Jeopardy, and read these documents.
This has been an exhaustive, yet rewarding time spent debunking and destroying their claims yet again. Remember guys, just because you read it in a magazine or see it on a tv screen, donât make it factual, as MJ said. Stay clowning their asses. I think Iâm done here đâď¸