oops you're easily offended by a simple question
Nah, just tired of sealioning.
Anyways, ace individuals are fine. Thereâs nothing of moral value negatively or positively in not experiencing sexual attraction. It is a frankly irrelevant piece of information, the same way I donât care about how people experience any of other facet of their sex life or lack thereof. I do not judge people on how they feel about sex unless it deal with rape.
But I have major issue with anyone who claims that cisgender straight people who donât feel sexual attraction have a spare orientation that magically makes them LGBT despite oppressing Lesbians, Gay Men, Bisexuals, and Trans and Nonbinary people. I have major issues with ace rhetoric sexualizing LGBT identities. I have major issues with ace rhetoric that you can healthily fuck people you arenât sexually attracted to and date people you arenât romantically attracted to, seeing as that is rhetoric taken directly from conversion therapy where LGBT people are told to forego their feelings and marry into a straight relationship and remain closeted.
I have issues with the idea that 10-18 year olds are being told that they are oppressed for being disinterested in sex or romance and that if you havenât finished puberty yet, youâre LGBT and are Different From Your Peers which is fearmongering and just... fucking offensive.
I object to ace rhetoric that sexual orientation is about your relationship to sexual intercourse when sexual orientation/ the suffix sexual is about sex as in gender.
I have issues with the ace history of uses the holocaust imagery in their flags and symbols on AVEN. Of using stripes in their flags so people associate them with LGBT people âbut not too much.â
I take issue with aces comparing cishet exclusion to TERFs excluding trans women from womenâs spaces.When one is LGBT people protecting themselves from their oppressors and the other is cis people treating those they oppress like fucking shit and leading to actual real life violence and suffering.
I take issue with ace inclusion going hand in hand with the corporate take over and pride and liberalism in mainstream LGBT activism.
Iâm tired of ace inclusion rhetoric being identical to kink, polyamous, intersex, and pedophile inclusion rhetoric.
Iâm tired of people thinking itâs okay o tell strangers and minors their relationship to sex.
iâm tired of those same people thinking that when I use the word bisexual instead of biromantic I am also telling people who I want to fuck when bisexual isnât about sex.
Iâm tired of cowards like you on anon--the only reason youâre on my blog is because I was brave enough to message someone off anon to call them out for clogging shit up by crying âACES ARE VALID!â
When... validity means nothing. Just like the word asexual. Asexual can mean doesnât experience sexual attraction (except if youâre grey, demi, cupio, lithro.. then yeah you can) but does experience romantic attraction, doesnât experience ANY attraction (unless youâre grey, demi, etc), or just doesnât want sex. Iâm tired of people whose words mean nothing going into the LGBT community and trying to make OUR words mean nothing through shit like the split attraction model or claiming cishets can reclaim queer. All to promote the idea of microidentities that supposedly make you more âqueerâ the more you identify with them even tho a solid 20% of them just mean shit like âso addicted to porn you canât get off to real people anymore.â
So, yeah, if you donât feel sexual attraction, I have no fucking issue with you. But if you support ace rhetoric and the ace communityâs destruction of language around sexuality and LGBT identities, then, thatâs what I have an issue with.
Not aceness. But ace âactivismâ which isnât about destroying rape culture or promoting enthusiastic consent in sex (which I would support) but rather about bullying LGBT people for not including every fucking scatter brained hot take the cishets at the helm of your community can come up with in between watching episodes of Camp Camp and Steven Universe.