XDLogan09

there is this annoying trend where for example someone will like. reinvent phrenology and someone will point out " you know the nazi's believed in that" and then response they'll go "oh so i should make sure my phrenology isn't racist or anti-sematic!" because they don't understand that assigning physical traits to intelligence or morality is still bad no matter what, not just because "people who i know are objectly bad share those beliefs for the wrong reasons" and this happens everytime.

someone will reblog a post that's like "men are genetically disposed to being evil due to their genes and brain chemistry" and than be told "you know this post was written by a terf and they're talking about trans women, right?" and than go "oh my bad" and than post "men are genetically disposed to being evil due to their genes and brain chemistry (this post is not about trans women!) terfs dni" and it's like. ok you know that doesn't suddenly help right?

This is a huge part of why listening to public trans discourse as a trans biologist is infuriating. 4chan OP is based AF.

Never thought I would see the sentence "4chan OP is based AF" be used and I especially never thought I'd agree but here we are

[Image Description: tweet by ACLU, verified, @ ACLU. It's dated December thirteenth, Twenty Twenty-three, and says "Breaking: The White House just released an immigration proposal that would increase mandatory detention and create a new system allowing mass deportations without due process." In reply AshleyStevens, @ The_Acumen, tweets "Remember when Democrats were doing photo ops at the border when Trump was president? Remember when they called those 'family holding facilities' concentration camps? Remember how they said allowing mass deportations without due process was fascism? Because I remember." End I.D]

🤤 great 🎂